Jump to content

Question about Swiss part numbers


Recommended Posts

I need to replace the date indicator driving wheel on a FHF 90.5. The part number is 2556. Cousins have most of the parts for this movement, but they have two date indicator driving wheels: one with the number 2556, listed as out-of-stock (obsolete), and one with the number 2556.1 (in stock). Unfortunately no pictures.

So what's the difference between 2556 and 2556.1? Which one do I need?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi    you could try comparisson sites, AG Thomas, Gleave and co, Dr Ranfft for tech details etc, Esslinger in the USA . Have a look on Cousins PDFs for the FHF 90.5 Tech sheet or Gleave & Co on their tech  hub for further information. All available on the web.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, saswatch88 said:

i wouldnt know but couldnt you call cousins and ask, they should know for sure

They have this policy:

 

"Due to the specialised nature of the industry and the variables with customer specific applications we are unable to provide individual technical advice on your requirements. Our website does provide all information to enable customers to identify and select their specific requirements.

If you need technical help we recommend you seek the assistance of a trade professional."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not many clues in the usual places on this question, funny enough though, I note that Watchguy, Gleave and Cousins all have the same hand made annotation on their parts sheets!

Most likely they are interchangeable and the 2556.1 is just an upgraded version.

By the way, if your German is up to scratch, this might interest you. If not, then just the oiling charts might be of use http://forum.watch.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=952077&d=1426676161

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be that the 2556 is for the 90.5 and the 2556-1 is for the 905 . Have some 90.5 and 905 movement can have a look if i have the part.   On the one i found is a plastic part that i think would easily break. Don't know if it's a 2556 or a 2556.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rogart63 said:

Could be that the 2556 is for the 90.5 and the 2556-1 is for the 905 . Have some 90.5 and 905 movement can have a look if i have the part.   On the one i found is a plastic part that i think would easily break. Don't know if it's a 2556 or a 2556.1

I had assumed that the 90.5 and the 905 where the same movement, just that some people forgot the dot!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, StuartBaker104 said:

Not many clues in the usual places on this question, funny enough though, I note that Watchguy, Gleave and Cousins all have the same hand made annotation on their parts sheets!

Most likely they are interchangeable and the 2556.1 is just an upgraded version.

By the way, if your German is up to scratch, this might interest you. If not, then just the oiling charts might be of use http://forum.watch.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=952077&d=1426676161

Thanks for the service manual, I don't know any German but it's still useful.

 

The part I need to replace looks like the one in that manual- i.e. a smiley face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Barnaby said:

I had assumed that the 90.5 and the 905 where the same movement, just that some people forgot the dot!

Don't know why. But if you look at ranfft there is a 90-5 and a 905 . They look to be the same? But have seen both 90,5  and 905 printed on the bottom plate. So i guess maybe one of them is an updated version . http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&2&2uswk&FHF_90_5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UPDATE:

I bought the part (the 2556.1) and it is exactly the same as the original. (The movement is a FHF 905, not a 90.5).

Unfortunately it hasn't resolved the issue- seems to be something funny going on with the date jumper...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Barnaby said:

UPDATE:

I bought the part (the 2556.1) and it is exactly the same as the original. (The movement is a FHF 905, not a 90.5).

Unfortunately it hasn't resolved the issue- seems to be something funny going on with the date jumper...

What about the date jumper? Lost the little gear on the stem? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I already got a new one of those as it was missing when I opened up the watch.

It turns out the end of the date jumper spring was turned up slightly, and catching on the underneath of the date guard plate. This was stopping the date jumper from operating properly. I've trimmed the end of the spring and now everything works.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...