Jump to content

Watch running fast


Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am new to this forum, and a beginner in watchmakig as a hobby. Recently i bought a timing machine to check the accuracy of an old Pronto watch (CAL. 2750). I tested the watch, it was running around 45 seconds fast and the beat etter was high. I then tried to adjust the beat error on the watch by adjusting the stund on the balance. 

Tested the watch again, and it was running crazy fast, around 900 sec+ a day. I have tried to demagnetize the watch, and it is now running at different rates between +240 to + 450. The balance spring looks fine in my eyes, no touching parts. Can anyone hjelp me find the fault? 

355F70E5-689C-475E-BDEF-D1311869B32A.jpeg

366F1A9A-7160-4E5D-8A9D-73FB67BA0DD2.jpeg

D86D7320-BD9E-4AE5-A8BE-43902A859F62.jpeg

F3AF8242-7EE8-4982-8975-5959F5730608.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm... tricky. Did you take a picture before you adjusted it?


I suspect the hs is now catching on the slot in the rate adjuster, or the  hs has been deformed slightly and coils are touching, or the hs is now dirty for some reason. Also check the balance pivots are still intact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Andy, HS issue.

Faulty HS end length, or the slit catches/ carries the HS. 

Move the adjust arm all the way towards the stud, that is max HS length activation. Readings on timegrapher should not vary then. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if it is running fast and has a beat error then the watch will need be adjusted not regulated. regulating (moving regulator stud to fast or slow) will not correct beat error. beat error occurs when the balance wheel will rotate lets say 360 degrees in one direction, then 270 degrees in the opposite direction. Normal osculation should be about 270 degrees in both directions. 

1. Observe the HS and BW under a strong eye loop. Is the the BW moving in fast short strokes (usual cause is magnetism), or is it moving wildly fast in long strokes. best way to see this is if you have a smart phone with slow motion feature record the BW then watch it in slow motion and you can get an idea of the degree in rotation and get an idea which direction is off. also under magnification watch the HS coils expand and contract, are any of the coils sticking, is the HS riding up or not laying completely flat.

2. Demagnetize the movement and balance assembly separately. remove pallet and cock and reinstall balance asbly. make sure the roller jewel rests in the middle of of the banking pins. if it does not then there is your "beat error" problem. you will have to adjust the HS collet on the BW untill that roller jewel is dead center in the banking pins. there is a way to do this with spring attached but that requires experience so HS will have to come off. remove the stud from the cock and observe how the HS sits on the BW, make sure there are no warped or sticking coils. if all is good then make your adjustment and reattach stud. time the watch again and see if there is any issues.

3. If there are still timing issues then a full service is in order. pivots will need to be checked for deformities and/or wear. picot jewels will need to be stripped and cleaned of old oil and debris, etc. End/side shakes of the BW should also checked before service begins.

A TIMING issue is a sure sign that a SERVICE is in order, so I will recommend a full service either way for this watch regardless of what the fault is. But I always like to do some fault finding first (things mention above) then proceed with the service, you will also be doing other quality control inspections during the duration of the service. i.e checking pivots, pivot jewels, mainspring, pinions and teeth, end/ side shakes of train, etc.

 

demagnetize the the movement and

Edited by saswatch88
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

I agree with Andy, HS issue.

Faulty HS end length, or the slit catches/ carries the HS. 

Move the adjust arm all the way towards the stud, that is max HS length activation. Readings on timegrapher should not vary then. 

 

HS end length is correctly shaped if collet stays right on top of the jewel hole, as you move the adjust arm through entire HS end length. If badly shaped you vary the conditions on HS as you move adjust arm.that is;  at one adjust position you may advance the impulse jewel while at anthor postion of adjust you retard. In other words you would be introducing error to the impulse jewel position while trying to adjust.

Not to mention other problems, improper HS shape brings.

That I think is what andy refers to, he is thinking. drastic difference reading could easily be due to the HS shape altering at dif adjust position, all due to bad  shape of HS end length or unsmoothness there.

I have a question to ask of andy,  How do interpret the change in slope of the gragh?

Thanks in advance.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The HS coils may be sticking intermittently, this typically results in a wavering graph. There may be some issue with the power train, dirt or damage, which can also show a wavering result, or the oscillator may be so far out of beat, that it has some secondary component to its oscillation. If you check Mark's videos, they may help.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/30/2019 at 12:40 AM, AndyHull said:

Hmmm... tricky. Did you take a picture before you adjusted it?


I suspect the hs is now catching on the slot in the rate adjuster, or the  hs has been deformed slightly and coils are touching, or the hs is now dirty for some reason. Also check the balance pivots are still intact.

Hi, sorry, no picture before i adjusted it. The hs looks good, will try to clean it and see if it helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the replies! Have tried to demag the movement (hairspring and movement separately). The hs looks good, can´t see it touch anything. This movement has not been cleand by me, so will try to do a full service and see what happens. Think i have to adjust the watch in beat as well, so will do a full service, adjust and cross my fingers. Thanks to all of you!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, espenbd said:

Thanks for all the replies! Have tried to demag the movement (hairspring and movement separately). The hs looks good, can´t see it touch anything. This movement has not been cleand by me, so will try to do a full service and see what happens. Think i have to adjust the watch in beat as well, so will do a full service, adjust and cross my fingers. Thanks to all of you!

update the forum on your progress

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1- Dispower the barrel at the click.

2- move adjust arm through the entire end length of the HS, ( from max retard,  to max advance) if that causes the BW move at all, the end length is wrongly shaped, In which case you are varying the impulse jewel beat as you move the adjust arm.

The impulse jewel should stay in beat as you move adjust arm.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎3‎/‎30‎/‎2019 at 12:58 AM, clockboy said:

Have you fitted a new mainspring. The hairspring looks good it is just running way to fast.

    if the balance is not magnetized,  put the regulator  in middle position and bend the hair spring till it is in beat.  there are books that show you how to do this.  vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/2/2019 at 6:08 PM, Nucejoe said:

1- Dispower the barrel at the click.

2- move adjust arm through the entire end length of the HS, ( from max retard,  to max advance) if that causes the BW move at all, the end length is wrongly shaped, In which case you are varying the impulse jewel beat as you move the adjust arm.

The impulse jewel should stay in beat as you move adjust arm.

I finally had some time to work with my watch today. Tried Nucejoe’s tip quoted above, but the BW did not move. As some of you suggested, i decided to clean the  balance only, before starting a full service. After some time in OneDip and drying, i started reassembling the balance and adjusting the watch in the timegrapher.

The watch beat is now looking good! The time is also a lot better now, haha. My only concern is the amplitude, it’s really low.

A9CC4836-F17C-43B0-9FC7-B40F32612C4F.jpeg

19051986-6215-4FCE-97F5-D4A3FB8DDF75.jpeg

530BD356-BE6A-49A7-A2BD-2FD4E703CB19.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you have friction somewhere, most likely due to dirt and/or dry pivots/mainspring. this watch needs a full service. new mainspring, cleaning and proper oiling. the watch is still slightly out of beat a little more work and it will be good to go

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I add power to the barrel manually. Just push to turn the barrel in direction it supplies power, If the amplitude flies, power supply is to be checked and MS tested.

If the amplitude remains the same or BW locks up ..etc, the issue is with the escapement.

Also check if end stones push on pivots.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, AndyHull said:

Assuming the watch is fully wound, I would suspect the low amplitude may be associated with a weak or dirty mainspring, or dirt somewhere in the power train.

Yes, it was fully wound. 

1 hour ago, saswatch88 said:

you have friction somewhere, most likely due to dirt and/or dry pivots/mainspring. this watch needs a full service. new mainspring, cleaning and proper oiling. the watch is still slightly out of beat a little more work and it will be good to go

Thanks, will do a full service when i have time to sit down with this project!

35 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

I add power to the barrel manually. Just push to turn the barrel in direction it supplies power, If the amplitude flies, power supply is to be checked and MS tested.

If the amplitude remains the same or BW locks up ..etc, the issue is with the escapement.

Also check if end stones push on pivots.

Wow, nice tip! Will definitly check this out, before starting a service. 

This forum is great, thanks to all of you! I’m learning a lot.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Needless to say, the slight amout of power to add is what we feel the power source fails to supply. Strongly pushed the escape will lock.

I agree with saswatch on both counts, friction and slightly out of beat. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Needless to say, the slight amout of power to add is what we feel the power source fails to supply. Strongly pushed the escape will lock.

I agree with saswatch on both counts, friction and slightly out of beat. 

 

 

yea good idea nuce! force power through the mainspring. best way to do this i would think is fully wind it then push on the ratchet wheel with pegwood and hold it, dont let it seat back into the click. see if amp goes up and then see if it drops when you let it go and ratchet sits back into the click.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I

1 hour ago, saswatch88 said:

yea good idea nuce! force power through the mainspring. best way to do this i would think is fully wind it then push on the ratchet wheel with pegwood and hold it, dont let it seat back into the click. see if amp goes up and then see if it drops when you let it go and ratchet sits back into the click.

I like your approach for being more suitable especially when the movement is assembled mounted on move- holder and to the TG.    Regards

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little update:

Stripped down the movement, cleaned the pivotholes with pegwood and ran the parts in the ultrasonic cleaner.

I then lubricated the old mainspring and put it back together. Assembled the wheels and bridge and oiled the pivots. That’s all for now, and i think the wheels are spinning good. Will keep you updated.

On the last picture, movement before cleaning to the left, cleaned to the right.

F0BDBD53-CA6B-4CD0-A97A-2CFAA0EDED32.jpeg

C132A2A6-1AC3-418A-8D2B-CE88B1C194CB.png

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This post has some pictures that describe how to get the spring back into the setting without having to disassemble anything.  With patience, this approach works.  The advice that the spring will ‘float’ back in when positioned just right is spot on. If you try to push it so it flexes and pops back into the setting, it’ll probably just fly away, as you’ve already found.  Hope that helps, Mark
    • I recognize myself all too well. It takes a lot of experience and discipline to recognize when it's time to cancel and come back at a later time. Very well said! We should have a forum dedicated to this topic as it is critical to achieve success when working on watches. It's a lot more important than most other things related to watch repair. And yes, just a short break can make a world of difference!
    • Hello Wai and welcome to the forum. A little information to enlighten you a little more TZIllustratedGlossary.pdf
    • I am certainly not the first one who happen to ruin the chronograph center-wheel of a Seiko 6139B. The internet, when you search for it, is littered with stories, even here on WRT there are some. One of the problems is that the service manual of the 6139A is readily available on the net, not so with the service manual of the 6139B. On top, reading other forums & stories, there are people who claim that there is hardly any difference between the 6139A and the 6139B movement, so the 6139A service manual will suffice. However, one of the crucial differences is the design of the chronograph center-wheel. Also the Seiko reference numbers are different. For the 6139A, the reference number for the chronograph center-wheel is 888610 and for the 6139B: 888611 or 888612, depending on which manual you are reading (and perhaps there is a difference between these two wheel too !??) To lubricated the 6139A chronograph center-wheel, the following graphic picture in the 6139A service manual is given; One has to press down the sprocket and oil it. Unaware of the difference in chrono center-wheel design, I pressed down on the sprocket, but there was no movement. Perhaps not understanding or interpreting the drawing correctly, I pressed with the tweezers on the 4th wheel. This caused the 4th wheel, which turned out to be a press fit to the sprocket by the 6139B, to strip off the sprocket. Thereby me joining the line of all the others, who tried this before and are now searching for "how to fix" this misfortune. In an older thread on WRT, member @ricardopalamino place a picture in which he shows the difference in center-wheel design between the 6139A and the 6139B. To the left the 6139B and to the right the 6139A. As can be seen on the left center-wheel, the 4th wheel is pressed onto a sprocket. Pressing down on it, as shown in the 6139A service manual, gives a ruinous result. People did several attempts to repair the damage, but so far, I haven't found a success story. Here is one of the attempts; Reading what already has been tried, I tried a different approach ..... but sadly failed too. Nevertheless, I'll show what I've done; perhaps somebody may fine-tune or expand on the idea and has success? In my staking set was an anvil with a 4.5mm hole, exact the size needed to fit the chrono center-wheel "up-side-down". The distance between the clutch parts and the 4th wheel was 0.25mm. To support the 4th wheel as close as possible up to its center, I used feeler gauge blades, on one side a 0.25mm blade, and on the other side a combination of 0.15mm + 0.10mm blades. This allowed me to tap the sprocket back onto the 4th wheel ...... The thickness of 0.25 blades doesn't prevent some "spring" action, and so my 4th wheel was slightly deformed. The re-attachment seemed successful, but when trying to true the wheel, the connection failed again 😭 Currently there is a NOS 6139B chronograph center-wheel on eBay. Last Sunday the price was €150, on Monday the seller increased the price to €165 !!         Prevention is better than the cure and I do hope that anyone in the future, searching for a 6139 manual, with read my "Warning". As for my Seiko, I'm not going to invest €165 for one part and since the rest is pretty good, I will sell the watch for "parts or repair" 😞  
    • Off the top of my head I can't remember which was which, but one of the hands had the clutch with the very fine radial teeth as described above, the other had a flat disc with two tiny 'pins', there was what looked like the remains of something black smeared on the opposite face, maybe the remains of rotted rubber? When I can get some good pictures of both I will post
×
×
  • Create New...