Jump to content

Small staking set (no frame)


Recommended Posts

I just bought this little set at a mart and am wondering exactly what I have and whether the necessary parts are there to use it. It's obviously a small swiss staking set (Star brand), for watchmaking I presume. 

There's a large round flat stump on the right, screwed into a hole in the box, for hammering on I suppose. 

There is no frame, just a die plate that fits into a round "holder" as you can see from the photos below. Under the die plate are holes around the outside that fit into the knob in the round holder center recess to secure the die in place. The other hole in the round holder center recess allows the 4mm stakes to fit through. The larger round hole in the center recess is possibly just to fit onto the placement rod at the center of the box, to prevent the assembly from moving around too much when stored inside?

There is a long piece on the left that is meant to be secured in a vice, which has a flat surface on one end, and a taper with hole in the center at the other end. The stakes are 4mm in diameter and don't fit into the hole in the tapered end. 

Is there something missing and if not, how is this staking set meant to be used (as opposed to a more usual staking set with a frame, which I have).  I suppose for small staking jobs that could be done on a bench and would not need the perfect perpendicularity that a frame provides for the stake hitting the work?

I also attach a catalog listing of a similar tool from the 1920's, in France.

Thank you, in advance, for your insights and expertise.

star staking set.jpg

star staking 1.JPG

star staking 2.JPG

star staking 3.JPG

star staking 4.JPG

star staking 5.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Super interesting!! I hadn’t seen any staking tool without a shaft to guide the stakes. There has to be a away set things up. I wonder if these sets are more accessories to a basic set rather than the whole tool by itself.

I’m interested to learn more about this! Let’s see what the gurus have to say [emoji1303]






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi rstl99   Yes it looks all there apart from a few gaps these are ok for general work, for balance work etc you need the  proper up right staking tool with rotating table and punches.  If you google watchmakers stanikng set or do the  same on ebay you will see what I mean therer are many makes K&D Star and many more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone and thanks for your feedback and suggestions.

I do own a full sized K&D Inverto staking set with all the necessary stakes and stumps.

But I had not seen a pared-down little staking set like the one I just bought.  Indeed, it has similarities to the one for clockwork showed above, but mine is quite small and dainty, and suited for watchwork (stakes are 4mm diameter, and some have very tiny holes in the centre).

A few months before, I had bought from the same seller a small set of stakes that I now realize were an accessory to this recent staking set I acquired.  In combining and organizing the stakes I made up a pretty complete set, and filled out the box containing the die plate and two flat anvils.

I'm thinking that perhaps there was a time when all staking sets were like this, before the companies invented the frame holder which aligns the stake to the die plate.  And that some watchmakers liked to use the frame-less set for some tasks, so companies kept making them (until the 1920's anyway, based on that catalog entry).  And that for some tasks, the simpler die plate and stakes are all that is needed.

Anyway, I'll use it for odd little jobs (maybe repairing fusee chains) and eventually will discover tasks it's well suited for.  I haven't yet seen such a set described in any watchmaker book that I own, as the staking sets described are always the ones with the frame.

Cheers.

 

IMG_0236 (2).JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For anyone still looking at this thread, my little research has only yielded that such a set was called a "set of punches".  It seems to pre-date the "staking set" that we are all much more familiar with in watchmaking parlance.  Although similar but larger "punch sets" are still made and sold, for use in clock repair (as one of the photos above attests).  For watches, the staking set reigns supreme.  However there are no doubt some situations where a "set of punches" like the one pictured above will prove useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I had this type and many more like it, the center piece/block is used in the same way as if it had a stand. Hardly ever used it for watch work, as I had two sets complete with the stands. Centering was a bugger. 

Edited by oldhippy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you so much, Hector and CJ. I appreciate the tech sheet and the video. Gasp, I think I will make the attempt. What's the worst that can happen? I think there may be a new balance complete in my future, though.  I'll update the post and let you know the result. R, Frank  
    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files Modular Movement Holder.pdf Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files: Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
    • Hi Frank, you have dived headlong into the deep end. Hairspring work has to be the scariest thing a newbie has to tackle. Your hairspring appears to be bent and just putting it back into the regulator would not allow the balance to work properly. It might start oscillating but the performance would not be good. The proper thing to do is to unstud the hairspring, remove the hairspring from the balance, reinstall the hairspring on the stud carrier, reshape the endcurve and centre the collet to the balance jewel hole. This challenge would either make you or break you. Hope that you will be able to fix your watch. Welcome to the world of watchmaking.  Watch this video. It think it'll give you an idea of the task ahead. From your 1st photo, I think you have a etachron type stud. Let me see if I can find a video on how to remove it from the arm.
    • Have read of the Tech Sheet attached on the balance section page 12. It may be bent but until you reposition it back in the regulator pins you'll never know. Cheers CJ 4R35B_4R36A.pdf
    • Aloha All, My Seiko 4R35B movement stopped working today. Upon closer inspection, it looks like the balance spring came out of the regulator pin. This is my first time working on a balance. Any advice on how to get this spring repositioned (back to normal)? I'm pretty sure that while adjusting the beat error on this movement, I must have turned the stud (I didn't even know they turned), and the spring eventually fell out.  Will the spring go back to even spacing when it's back in the pin, or does it look bent? Thanks, Frank  
×
×
  • Create New...