Jump to content

Small staking set (no frame)


Recommended Posts

I just bought this little set at a mart and am wondering exactly what I have and whether the necessary parts are there to use it. It's obviously a small swiss staking set (Star brand), for watchmaking I presume. 

There's a large round flat stump on the right, screwed into a hole in the box, for hammering on I suppose. 

There is no frame, just a die plate that fits into a round "holder" as you can see from the photos below. Under the die plate are holes around the outside that fit into the knob in the round holder center recess to secure the die in place. The other hole in the round holder center recess allows the 4mm stakes to fit through. The larger round hole in the center recess is possibly just to fit onto the placement rod at the center of the box, to prevent the assembly from moving around too much when stored inside?

There is a long piece on the left that is meant to be secured in a vice, which has a flat surface on one end, and a taper with hole in the center at the other end. The stakes are 4mm in diameter and don't fit into the hole in the tapered end. 

Is there something missing and if not, how is this staking set meant to be used (as opposed to a more usual staking set with a frame, which I have).  I suppose for small staking jobs that could be done on a bench and would not need the perfect perpendicularity that a frame provides for the stake hitting the work?

I also attach a catalog listing of a similar tool from the 1920's, in France.

Thank you, in advance, for your insights and expertise.

star staking set.jpg

star staking 1.JPG

star staking 2.JPG

star staking 3.JPG

star staking 4.JPG

star staking 5.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Super interesting!! I hadn’t seen any staking tool without a shaft to guide the stakes. There has to be a away set things up. I wonder if these sets are more accessories to a basic set rather than the whole tool by itself.

I’m interested to learn more about this! Let’s see what the gurus have to say [emoji1303]






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi rstl99   Yes it looks all there apart from a few gaps these are ok for general work, for balance work etc you need the  proper up right staking tool with rotating table and punches.  If you google watchmakers stanikng set or do the  same on ebay you will see what I mean therer are many makes K&D Star and many more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone and thanks for your feedback and suggestions.

I do own a full sized K&D Inverto staking set with all the necessary stakes and stumps.

But I had not seen a pared-down little staking set like the one I just bought.  Indeed, it has similarities to the one for clockwork showed above, but mine is quite small and dainty, and suited for watchwork (stakes are 4mm diameter, and some have very tiny holes in the centre).

A few months before, I had bought from the same seller a small set of stakes that I now realize were an accessory to this recent staking set I acquired.  In combining and organizing the stakes I made up a pretty complete set, and filled out the box containing the die plate and two flat anvils.

I'm thinking that perhaps there was a time when all staking sets were like this, before the companies invented the frame holder which aligns the stake to the die plate.  And that some watchmakers liked to use the frame-less set for some tasks, so companies kept making them (until the 1920's anyway, based on that catalog entry).  And that for some tasks, the simpler die plate and stakes are all that is needed.

Anyway, I'll use it for odd little jobs (maybe repairing fusee chains) and eventually will discover tasks it's well suited for.  I haven't yet seen such a set described in any watchmaker book that I own, as the staking sets described are always the ones with the frame.

Cheers.

 

IMG_0236 (2).JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For anyone still looking at this thread, my little research has only yielded that such a set was called a "set of punches".  It seems to pre-date the "staking set" that we are all much more familiar with in watchmaking parlance.  Although similar but larger "punch sets" are still made and sold, for use in clock repair (as one of the photos above attests).  For watches, the staking set reigns supreme.  However there are no doubt some situations where a "set of punches" like the one pictured above will prove useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I had this type and many more like it, the center piece/block is used in the same way as if it had a stand. Hardly ever used it for watch work, as I had two sets complete with the stands. Centering was a bugger. 

Edited by oldhippy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is the insert ring for rectangular or elliptical movements: Note that the length is the side with the stem cut out on the spreadsheet (in the picture below this is 15.15: Here is the fake pdf file, again you need to convert to .zip after download to access the FreeCAD and 3mf files. Rectangular insert disc.pdf    
    • as you took the mainspring out what did it look like? It's amazing how much amplitude you can get if the mainspring actually has the proper shape. last week I was doing a 12 size Hamilton and was very much surprised with the beautiful back curvature the mainspring had. Then the watch had a really nice amplitude the group would be so proud it was 350 until I dropped the lift angle down to 38 that drop the amplitude quite a bit below 300. then with the beautiful back curve it still had really nice amplitude the next day. I really wish all my mainspring's look like this as the watch had beautiful amplitude the next day. So many of the aftermarket pocketwatch Springs I see now do not have anything resembling a back curve may be a slight curve and that's about all. They still work but they just don't work as nice as a properly made spring. then Omega as all sorts of nifty technical documentation unfortunately every single corner is watermarked with where it came from who downloaded it etc. very paranoid company. On the other hand I will snip out images like from the document on recycling a mainspring barrel. for instance here's the section on what your mainspring should look like. water damaged a lot of times means rust was there rust on this watch?
    • I dont understand why a patreon membership would have limited places ??
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy. It’s highly unlikely you will be able to purchase a new bezel look on eBay for a pulsar watch for repair to find a bezel.
×
×
  • Create New...