Jump to content

Hamilton Railroad 992, 21j problem...maybe?


Sean

Recommended Posts

Good day oracles of mechanical knowledge, I have a pondering issue and was curious whether this anomaly is cause for concern. I own several pocket watches (8, or 9?). Howards, key wound/set, early Elgins...but this silver cased Hamilton has me scratching my head. All of my watches will start to keep time with a couple of twists of the stem ratchet (or quarter turns of the key as may be the case.) but this Hamilton model 992 won't.  This particular watch seems to have to be wound an awfully long time and only once it is fully wound will it begin to keep time. Once it is running it keeps time just fine, I've had it running for weeks on end and it doesn't appear to speed up or slow down. Is it normal for a watch to have to be completely wound before it keeps time? If not (as I suspect), what could be the cause of the problem? 

Thanks in advance,

Seán

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What actual power dose it reserve?  Wind fully see how long it runs on full wind, that gives and idea of MS strength and actual power delivery.

Out of beat impulse jewel can also be the cause.Partially wind like two or three turns, Dose it keep on runing? If shaken to kick start the runing? 

Dirty jewels can cause this , A droplet of kerosene, avgas or lighter fluid etc,  on the top jewel assembly and on lower pivot, temoprarly acts as lubricants, frees the pivots of congealed oil. 

Providing such data, is greately helpful to  members for proper diagnostic.

Regards joe.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Nucejoe; The watch will wind. Once fully wound it will run and keep time for better than 36 hours or perhaps more, but not 48.

If I wind it two or three turns, it will not run. 

I haven't counted exactly how many full turns my other watches will wind until they stop at fully wound, but this Hamilton 992 would take twice as many turns until it reaches its stop (its a ridiculous amount of time on the ratchet and it's kind of stiff).

As my other watches don't behave this way, I'm assuming something is wrong? 

If someone replaced a broken main spring with the wrong one, would the watch conceivably act the way I'm describing?   

Pic for entertainment factor, I assume you are all familiar with these movements.

Hamilton 992 .jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi sean , No I am not familiar with amreican pocket watches, just general diagnostics.

Runing for 36hrs, means the MS is not  broken nor dose it's end  dislodge from the barrel wall neither from barrel arbor. The actual power reserve is 36 hrs or more, so mainspring is healthy though can be the wrong one, on the other hand the MS is got to unusally long, which brings up the question , how that extra length did get packed in limited space inside the barrel. I am not rejecting you suspecion on the length though.

I am inclined to think, stiffness is due to faulty mesh in wind mech, if so,  you should see signs showing material damage at the teeth of the gears when you strip down. So lets wait for more response to come in, if it came down to what I suspect , you may want to remove the ratchet wheel and barrel bridge to check. 

If you removed the barrel , check the  inside for sign of slippage on its wall.

Check the click spring, if  malfunctions ot can let power slipaage and if stuck underneath the ratchet wheel makes it get stiff.

Keep us posted please. Regards. Joe

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Hi sean , No I am not familiar with amreican pocket watches, just general diagnostics.

Runing for 36hrs, means the MS is not  broken nor dose it's end  dislodge from the barrel wall neither from barrel arbor. The actual power reserve is 36 hrs or more, so mainspring is healthy though can be the wrong one, on the other hand the MS is got to unusally long, which brings up the question , how that extra length did get packed in limited space inside the barrel. I am not rejecting you suspecion on the length though.

I am inclined to think, stiffness is due to faulty mesh in wind mech, if so,  you should see signs showing material damage at the teeth of the gears when you strip down. So lets wait for more response to come in, if it came down to what I suspect , you may want to remove the ratchet wheel and barrel bridge to check. 

If you removed the barrel , check the  inside for sign of slippage on its wall.

Check the click spring, if  malfunctions ot can let power slipaage and if stuck underneath the ratchet wheel makes it get stiff.

Keep us posted please. Regards. Joe

Thanks kindly Joe; I await things like a loupe, screwdrivers, tweezers, etc. Once I get into it, no doubt there will be many other questions.

Yours,

Seán 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...