Jump to content

Movado Subsea Chronograph


Recommended Posts

Here's a couple of Movado Subsea Chronographs from the 1950's that are just about twins.  The one on the right (#1) has had a bit of a hard life compared to the one on the left.  Gone are the Kris hands from the minute and hour registers.  The original crown is missing too and it appears that the pendant tube was modified to make the new crown fit (see bottom pic).  It's a terrible shame as this is a Taubert/Borgel case and of high quality craftsmanship.  The outer end of the pendant tube has been lost (perhaps filed off) and the cork gasket is long gone.

The Subsea on the right (#2) is in better shape with the original Kris hands, crown, and a movement that appears to have been serviced recently. The lead caseback gasket is gone and replaced with a rubber one and the larger hands are clearly wrong- why have luminous paint on the dial if the hands have none?

The trick here will be to bring both watches back to Movado factory specifications.  I doubt I can locate the Kris hands but if anyone knows where I can find a proper Borgel style crown and is willing to share the info that would be greatly appreciated!  I picked up an old Mido Multifort which has a similar crown but it would be a shame to steal parts from it as it's otherwise complete.

I've dug through my vintage hand drawer and think I might have the proper hour and minute hands needed for #2.

I wonder if there are there any thoughts on how I could go about fixing the pendant tube on #1?  The backup plan will be to just leave it as it is- the watch is vintage and replacing the cork gaskets in the pusher tubes to a level that will ensure reliable water resistance is probably not possible (I don't have the tools and I don't believe replacement cork gaskets can be found). I do love to do restorations though... Any thoughts/suggestions are appreciated. 

Thanks!

IMG_5618.thumb.JPG.084fc819afc91665fab3f38747ae04c3.JPG

IMG_5622.thumb.JPG.34f87b8a383e6a273cd1fb40019593e0.JPG

IMG_5623.thumb.JPG.cfaec853ce90a73aaa090c8b0ede3386.JPG

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RyMoeller said:

Here's a couple of Movado Subsea Chronographs from the 1950's that are just about twins.  The one on the right (#1) has had a bit of a hard life compared to the one on the left.  Gone are the Kris hands from the minute and hour registers.  The original crown is missing too and it appears that the pendant tube was modified to make the new crown fit (see bottom pic).  It's a terrible shame as this is a Taubert/Borgel case and of high quality craftsmanship.  The outer end of the pendant tube has been lost (perhaps filed off) and the cork gasket is long gone.

The Subsea on the right (#2) is in better shape with the original Kris hands, crown, and a movement that appears to have been serviced recently. The lead caseback gasket is gone and replaced with a rubber one and the larger hands are clearly wrong- why have luminous paint on the dial if the hands have none?

The trick here will be to bring both watches back to Movado factory specifications.  I doubt I can locate the Kris hands but if anyone knows where I can find a proper Borgel style crown and is willing to share the info that would be greatly appreciated!  I picked up an old Mido Multifort which has a similar crown but it would be a shame to steal parts from it as it's otherwise complete.

I've dug through my vintage hand drawer and think I might have the proper hour and minute hands needed for #2.

I wonder if there are there any thoughts on how I could go about fixing the pendant tube on #1?  The backup plan will be to just leave it as it is- the watch is vintage and replacing the cork gaskets in the pusher tubes to a level that will ensure reliable water resistance is probably not possible (I don't have the tools and I don't believe replacement cork gaskets can be found). I do love to do restorations though... Any thoughts/suggestions are appreciated. 

Thanks!

 

IMG_5622.thumb.JPG.34f87b8a383e6a273cd1fb40019593e0.JPG

 

 

I'm sorry I don't have any leads on your request Ry. Are these column chronos an in-house? The movements are beautiful.

J

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, noirrac1j said:

I'm sorry I don't have any leads on your request Ry. Are these column chronos an in-house? The movements are beautiful.

J

Thanks- I'm sure one will show up in time.  ;o)

Yes, the movements are in-house column wheel chronographs; you might know I'm trying to work my way through all of the manual chronographs of the golden age!  They're quite nice though- they do look better in person but feel better than any other watch I've had thus far. Movado made some keepers back in the day.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RyMoeller said:

Here's a couple of Movado Subsea Chronographs from the 1950's that are just about twins.  The one on the right (#1) has had a bit of a hard life compared to the one on the left.  Gone are the Kris hands from the minute and hour registers.  The original crown is missing too and it appears that the pendant tube was modified to make the new crown fit (see bottom pic).  It's a terrible shame as this is a Taubert/Borgel case and of high quality craftsmanship.  The outer end of the pendant tube has been lost (perhaps filed off) and the cork gasket is long gone.

The Subsea on the right (#2) is in better shape with the original Kris hands, crown, and a movement that appears to have been serviced recently. The lead caseback gasket is gone and replaced with a rubber one and the larger hands are clearly wrong- why have luminous paint on the dial if the hands have none?

The trick here will be to bring both watches back to Movado factory specifications.  I doubt I can locate the Kris hands but if anyone knows where I can find a proper Borgel style crown and is willing to share the info that would be greatly appreciated!  I picked up an old Mido Multifort which has a similar crown but it would be a shame to steal parts from it as it's otherwise complete.

I've dug through my vintage hand drawer and think I might have the proper hour and minute hands needed for #2.

I wonder if there are there any thoughts on how I could go about fixing the pendant tube on #1?  The backup plan will be to just leave it as it is- the watch is vintage and replacing the cork gaskets in the pusher tubes to a level that will ensure reliable water resistance is probably not possible (I don't have the tools and I don't believe replacement cork gaskets can be found). I do love to do restorations though... Any thoughts/suggestions are appreciated. 

Thanks!

IMG_5618.thumb.JPG.084fc819afc91665fab3f38747ae04c3.JPG

IMG_5622.thumb.JPG.34f87b8a383e6a273cd1fb40019593e0.JPG

IMG_5623.thumb.JPG.cfaec853ce90a73aaa090c8b0ede3386.JPG

 

   i ave one of these movado's,  seems to me it has a lead case gasket.  vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RyMoeller said:

Thanks- I'm sure one will show up in time.  ;o)

Yes, the movements are in-house column wheel chronographs; you might know I'm trying to work my way through all of the manual chronographs of the golden age!  They're quite nice though- they do look better in person but feel better than any other watch I've had thus far. Movado made some keepers back in the day.

You're working your way through ALL the chronographs?!? Man, I wish I had time to even do the top three. My experience thus far is limited to 7750 and one Landeron cal 2. I'm looking for a birthday year watch and was leaning towards valjoux 7733 or Omega's lemania-derived 861-1863. Thoughts? 

J

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, noirrac1j said:

You're working your way through ALL the chronographs?!? Man, I wish I had time to even do the top three. My experience thus far is limited to 7750 and one Landeron cal 2. I'm looking for a birthday year watch and was leaning towards valjoux 7733 or Omega's lemania-derived 861-1863. Thoughts? 

J

Yeah, I'm not really sure what even got me started on the path; I guess I just like seeing the different solutions each manufacturer had for the same problems.  It's a hobby though so time is on my side. ^_^

I have an affinity for Venus movements (which the 7730 is derived from) but the 861 is considered by some as the best manual wind chronograph out there. I'm not aware of any weaknesses in the movement.  Also, if you don't have one already, it's a good excuse to get an Omega Speedmaster.  Hamilton has some great 7730 chronographs too.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, RyMoeller said:

Also, if you don't have one already, it's a good excuse to get an Omega Speedmaster.  Hamilton has some great 7730 chronographs too.

 

I like the way you think! I'm looking for an Omega now, and I like the Speedmaster Broad Arrow reissue with the plexi and caliber 1861.

J

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is.
    • I recently bought this but not on ebay. I figured if I want something Japanese I better check Japanese auction sites since these don't seem to pop up on ebay. I paid 83 € plus shipping & taxes. I think it was pretty reasonable for a complete set in good condition.
    • Did you take the friction pinion off the large driving wheel and grease it? Although, now that I think about it, that shouldn't have any effect on the free running of the train if the friction pinion isn't interacting withe minute wheel/setting wheel...
    • I did in fact use Rodico to get the spring into general position and "hold" it there while I used a fine oiler to make subtle positional adjustments.
×
×
  • Create New...