Jump to content

Removing a Balance Staff with a Staking Tool


Recommended Posts

The key to removing balance staff is not to damage / bend the balance arm. The platax tool used correctly supports the arm and the correct tool to be used with a staking tool also supports the balance arm. However for this reason I always now remove as much of the rivet as I can before pushing out the old balance to avoid any possible damage to the arm. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good advice in prior posts.

I've the C version of the type of staking set that the video that video in OH's posting has a link to. The D version has the addition of the base for the tool.

The Unruh-Max, the tool for balance staff removal, appears at 1:05 in the video. It doesn't come as part of the C set and I don't think it's part of the D set as standard.

There is one currently on e-bay UK which looks to be ok. Item 153398604657 (I've no connection to this item.)

I bought mine on e-bay a few years back following a prior post on this forum. It can be used with most staking sets not just Bergeon branded sets. I have used mine on a few pocket watches.

The K&D tool that you have a link to is a different tool but fundemenly is designed for the same task as the Unruh-Max. That is they are balance staff removal tools.

Whichever tool you choose to use to remove the staff, you will need a decent staking set of punches and anvils to rivet the new staff on to the balance wheel.




Sent from my moto g(6) play using Tapatalk

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have one. It fits into your staking tool and it shocks (via a spring) out the balance.However be aware that if it does not work due to a tight fitting balance damage can happen to the balance. I always remove some of the rivet first damaging the balance can be a real head ache.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, clockboy said:

I have one. It fits into your staking tool and it shocks (via a spring) out the balance.However be aware that if it does not work due to a tight fitting balance damage can happen to the balance. I always remove some of the rivet first damaging the balance can be a real head ache.

That's the thing with the various "removing tools", they tend to work OK until they don't. I know not everyone has or wants a lathe, but it really is the best tool for removing staffs, my preference is to turn off the hub for zero risk of enlarging the hole.

I have used the K&D tool in the past, fairly often when I was working in a trade shop while in school. No lathe in that shop. I imagine it works as well as a Platax, which is to say pretty well. I still have the tool but it hasn't been used in 20 years.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve never had an issue with using a Platax. I’ve seen balance wheels which have damage due to over-enthusiastic work with the graver when a staff has been turned down. But you could easily damage a balance wheel by incorrectly using a Platax. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had an incident with the platax on a vintage Rolex it was tight & I must admit I did give more force than usual. When I tried to fit the new balance to was too loose. It may have been the new balance was wrong but I suspect the hole had stretched. Ironically a few months later in my BHI mag the subject of removing vintage Rolex balances was covered. It was stated the balances on the vintage Rolex were made of hard metal and the guy annealed them first before removing some of the rivet. 

 Anyway, since then I now always remove some of the rivet. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/6/2019 at 11:56 AM, margolisd said:

Thanks OH. But which one is the balance staff remover? I thought it would look something like this.

 

I spent a tense hour watching this guy's video for the process.  I have to admit, while he goes about it in the wrong way many times, he would be me if I talked to myself while working.  His frustration is familiar.


RMD

 

< Clearly, editing is too much trouble for him!:;)>

Edited by rduckwor
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think if you want to play Billy big b.ollocks then you have to have something up your sleeve, anyone that knows how to fight, plays dirty. Lets face it a lot of folk that voted for Brexit just rolled uk their sleeves to say up yours EU hoping for good changes. We have idiots for leaders and probably none of them clever enough to clean the shitty stick they were given. I didnt vote, what will be will be.
    • I voted leave too, my reasoning was the the EU is undemocratic, no elected officials. I don't regret it but I  am sad that both sides acted like petulant toddlers.  Shameful.  I'm not on other forums but if I was and left this site, would you shun me? Of course not, we aren't petulant toddlers.  
    • This is a type of tool that may be suitable to remove the bezel - though note that I'm pretty sure the watch should be face down - not face up, as in some of the photos of these tools on amazon & ebay! If you try one one of those, put the movement screws back in first to avoid accidents. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Removal-Professional-Remover-Watchmaker-Diameter/dp/B09XCH4QVN?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&smid=A296NCMMFVXSDN&th=1  
    • Hi, I’m constantly asking my wife to help me with removing the stem in order to complete casing. To expand, this is not a challenge for me when the setting lever is secured by a screw (older calibers). However when the setting lever is attached to a spring loaded setting lever axel, like on more modern calibers, I simply don’t see how to apply enough pressure on the button to get the stem out short of putting the movement face down with the dial and hands attached, which I’m loath to do in order to avoid damaging the dial/hands? what technique should I be using? thanks  
    • Many thanks for your advice (being borne in mind at present) & offer Dell. When I was given the clock the plastic anchor was loose on the arbour (it had split at the 'hole') &, after repairing this, I have been trying to determine whether the spindle (pin) should be perpendicular when the pallet is sitting on a flat surface; or whether, when installed, its L-R extremes (or alternatively its tick & tock points) should lie at equal angles from the vertical when moved with spring absent. I can get the clock to run but in every such configuration the top block has to be turned anti-clockwise (from above) by quite a bit in order to be 'in beat' & it always runs fast (despite the pendulum being set to as slow as possible). This makes me wonder if there is any particular feature of/fault in a torsion spring clock which determines which turn direction (if any) is necessary to get it 'in beat'; & whether there would be a different set of settings that would get it running nearer to time at somewhere around the mid timing/inertia position which would then allow tweaking of the fast/slow setting.
×
×
  • Create New...