Jump to content

Anybody Know


bjd1020

Recommended Posts

Helvetia, Société d'Horlogerie La Générale (General watch co) do your search around this information that shock absorber was patented by them in the 1920's.
Thanks. Any idea on a value? Its actually functioning.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it in a gold case, if so what is the carat? It will also depend on its weight. 
Hey there ole Man. Hope all is well. It was in a solid silver case. Although im not so sure it was the origional. daf4b1a59837b6a25dcd2907f17b3eb0.jpg472e107689b241719eefaec64a212e89.jpgd4280a470eea8531fad0158f7c01e024.jpg

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I collect WWII watches and sometimes you come around a similar movement, Helvetia 82A.
This one seems more like it's past 1945.The Value is what someone is willing to pay for it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I collect WWII watches and sometimes you come around a similar movement, Helvetia 82A.
This one seems more like it's past 1945.The Value is what someone is willing to pay for it.
Roger that. Thanks for the obviois economics lesson. I was more interested in the case when I purchased it for 85 bucks, then when I got it and was able to get a close look at the case I found it to be not so appealing but quickly fell in love with the movement.....not sure what plans Ill have for it.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did the movement and case come together?
The case looks like it has a pin set on the side..
It did. But like I said it look as if the case was worked by hand. The stem looks handmade as well. So im thinking its not origional.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The case is a Francis Borgel waterproof case it looks too early for the movement, but it appears to have import marks on the inside of the case so you should be able to date the case from the date letter, I would put the case from 1910-1920 so too early for that movement.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not sure exactly what the rules are but if youre interested in it id be willimg to trade (not sell). I picked it up while shopping for cases for a more modern build. Im more into 60s and 70s era movements but also like the case work of the WWII era. Something about the movement though is appealing to me. The case is solid silver. Ill attach a few pics of the dial and crystal.c4fd60551bbdeb413d89a9db5308cf26.jpg960e65e799355cab81765c0d543f83ab.jpg

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
On 3/1/2019 at 3:39 PM, bjd1020 said:

It did. But like I said it look as if the case was worked by hand. The stem looks handmade as well. So im thinking its not origional.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

Hello there. I know I am resurrecting another old thread but I wanted to let you know that I am 99% sure your watch is original and all the bits go together, apart from the hands where at least one is wrong, as they are not a pair, and probably both (they were probably luminous originally).

As has been said the movement is a Helvetia 81-24, this movement was introduced in 1929 when Helvetia patented their new shock protection system. Helvetia is a brand I collect and have a site on, they only numbered the bridges of their movements for a short period around 1930.

The serial number on the case is a Helvetia one and also dates the case to 1930, this would make the hallmark date letter a 'Z' which it does appear to be. You can see the lugs of the case are of a later style more similar to a cushion watch than earlier Borgel trench watches.

Helvetia specialised in water and shock protected watches, their main importer to the UK was Robert Pringle and Sons of London. You can see the Robert Pringle and Sons import mark 'AGR' on the case (for Arthur George Rendell an employee of the company).

Periodically Robert Pringle and Sons published a catalogue and below as the final proof is a picture of your watch from the 1931 edition, note the case style is the same as your watch and different to earlier Borgel cases.

 863411953_Wilderness1931Borgel.jpg.03db92cc94ff2008c483ed0ea4935a41.jpg

Have a look at my site here https://www.helvetiahistory.co.uk/1930s-sports-watches for more info on Helvetia water and shock proof watches.

Thanks. Carl.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2019 at 3:39 AM, bjd1020 said:

 

Not sure if this is the right spot. But can anybody help identify this movement?3547e4f2c1669e4a6f8ae35452eb7dc7.jpg6d926aa7c2cda80af9e9bacf323ca6c9.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Also for your information here is another part of the page from the catalogue where they reference the movement in your watch, in particular the shock absorber.

59z0v90.jpg

Thanks.

Carl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2019 at 5:37 PM, bjd1020 said:

Im not sure exactly what the rules are but if youre interested in it id be willimg to trade (not sell). I picked it up while shopping for cases for a more modern build. Im more into 60s and 70s era movements but also like the case work of the WWII era. Something about the movement though is appealing to me. The case is solid silver. Ill attach a few pics of the dial and crystal.c4fd60551bbdeb413d89a9db5308cf26.jpg960e65e799355cab81765c0d543f83ab.jpg

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

And lastly here is a slightly earlier version.

Note earlier Helvetia serial number and hallmark dates it to 1928. Case shape is the same more cushion like one. Hands are the same as one of your so it looks like one of your could be correct. Sometimes luminous dials without luminous paint were used with non-luminous hands.

The movement is an earlier adapted FHF one as this is before the Cal 81 came out in 1929. Notice the "Patent Shock Absorber" and "3 Adjustments dot star dot" is the same.

hVZ8mEVl.jpg

ihdKRd1l.jpg

idMFXsrl.jpg

Thanks.

Carl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
On 3/1/2019 at 5:18 PM, Nucejoe said:

Says adjusted in three position and rare and unique shock protection, if dial and hands are in good shape and the rest Genuine, I would seriously look into restoration.

 

 

 

 

 

Hello again. Just to let you guys know that as a collector of Helvetia watches I reached out to bjd1020 with an offer to buy this watch for restoration. I received it a couple of months ago and have been slowly getting it back to it's original condition.

I received the crown I needed today and here is the result:

20201029_135313.thumb.jpg.a77f0d9f2fea1d66f71192b7e9cd63c7.jpg

And with it's 13 away serial number brother I found while looking for parts for this one.

20201029_134717.thumb.jpg.9d6c0b53f53f73ea126014d7204b8461.jpg

Thanks. Carl.

Edited by Penfold
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...