Jump to content

Different mainspring dimensions


Recommended Posts

Hello!

I have a ETA 900 movement with a broken mainspring that I am looking to repair. I was looking for a replacement and found this information:

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&ETA_900

With the dimensions: 1.55 x 9.0 x 0.10 x 290

Then when I went to order one on cousinsUK I searched for the movement and found out that they claimed this to be the right replacement:

https://www.cousinsuk.com/category/filter/eta-esa-movement-parts

With the dimensions: 1.55 x 9.0 x 0.105 x 280

Which one should i try to find? will they both the dimensions mentioned do the job? (p.s I do not have the possibility to measure the broken one precise enough) 

Thankful for all answers, regards, Jakob Vinkås

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newbie here, but I'm wondering if the slight increase in thickness compensates for the slightly reduced length? Also, what is the "9.0" in this measurement? I'm guessing is has to do with how much is reverse-coiled?

 

EDIT -  Finally found that it looks like it's the intended barrel diameter. Is that correct?

Edited by qhartman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, qhartman said:

Newbie here, but I'm wondering if the slight increase in thickness compensates for the slightly reduced length? Also, what is the "9.0" in this measurement? I'm guessing is has to do with how much is reverse-coiled?

 

EDIT -  Finally found that it looks like it's the intended barrel diameter. Is that correct?

From what i know, it is the inside diameter of the barrel

 

14 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

1.55 x 9.0 x 0.105 x 280 Will be fine. It has very little differance. 

 

Thank you for the answer, I will order the one from cousinsUK then.

/Jakob

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Unfortunately I'm not that lucky. I started on the train side and after I noticed the binding I pulled everything out except the driving wheel to rule everything else out. It still binds. I'm going to double check that the pinion is fully seated on the staff first, then if no joy I'll push the bridge jewel up a fraction of a mm. Fingers crossed!
    • Happy to have helped, great way to start the day with a win! 🥳
    • Thank you for the advise!! It worked. The setting screw was a lock/unlock to remove the rotor. 
    • I have that French tech sheet too, it is a little different than the English one (eg, it doesn't have the auto works diagram). BTW, it looks like you are looking up the case number in the 1979 ABC supplement. The 1974 ABC catalog does have the 3093 case. As you determined it takes the 1222-5 crystal.  When I serviced my President 'A' (which also takes that crystal), I was able to fit a 29.8 crystal from my DPA crystal assortment. Those are, in my opinion, a great deal. The assortment comes with 10 sizes each from 27.8mm to 32.4mm in 0.2 increments. I pretty much use them for any non-armored crystal that takes a high dome crystal. I think they no longer make them but Cousins has still has some in stock but when I bought them they were around $40 for the set and now they are around $100. Still, at 40 cents a crystal it's still a good deal. For the large driving wheel, I remember I once assembled the keyless/motion works first and when I placed the large driving wheel it was interfering with the setting wheel on the dial side as the teeth were not fully meshing and it wouldn't fully seat. If that isn't the issue I got nothing and am looking forward to see how you solve it 🙂
    • Not sure, but just looking at it, it seems like the screw on the right may be a fake? The one on the left may not be a screw in the regular sense at all, rather a 2 position device, I think you need to point the slot towards either of the 2 dots and one will secure and one will open. Like I said this is just my best guess looking at the pictures.
×
×
  • Create New...