Jump to content

What can cause rate to cycle every 5 minutes?


Recommended Posts

I have an issue with an antique Hamilton 974 pocket watch (circa 1912). The watch has been recently serviced including jewels and gears inspection, new mainspring, cleaning and lubricating. Balance wheel swings freely with good amplitude (270 degrees), beat error is 2.4ms (can be improved), the rate after some adjustments is now fairly consistent in all positions.

The problem shows on the timographer as slow but regular oscillation of the rate. The oscillation cycle is exactly 5 minutes. The maximum difference in rate between low and high is approximately 30 seconds per day. During the slow rate of the cycle I can also see lower amplitude (250 degrees) and an increase in beat error to 2.7ms.

This watch escapement is 18000 bph. The only gear that rotates close to 5 minutes is third gear which, however, makes one rotation every 7.5 minutes. Anyway, just to be safe I replaced the third gear but the problem remained.

What can be the cause of such a behavior? What kind of defect can produce such a cycle? 

Or, perhaps it's just something that might occur in an antique escapement? "The nature-of-the-beast"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen this before and I agree with nickelsilver It's the teeth of the barrel mashing with the pinion of the center wheel.  The watch I had somebody had substituted a different mainspring barrel and it was a very severe issue until I got a replacement barrel. Basically couldn't even time the watch at all.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

What's the tooth count of the barrel and center pinion? I'm suspecting a depthing problem due to worn center plate and bridge holes.

I agree that this is his problem. he probably has a pivot or two of worn on one of the wheels . Unless it is a tooth of one of the wheels that is worn and that the watchmaker has not seen. It happens sometimes too

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I've seen this before and I agree with nickelsilver It's the teeth of the barrel mashing with the pinion of the center wheel.  The watch I had somebody had substituted a different mainspring barrel and it was a very severe issue until I got a replacement barrel. Basically couldn't even time the watch at all.

I haven't thought about that. I have have another barrel and a center wheel, so, I will be able to swap those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, centerwheel said:

I haven't thought about that. I have have another barrel and a center wheel, so, I will be able to swap those.

Before swapping the parts why don't you look at what you have to see why they're not working?

Then parts swapping on American pocket watches? On modern Swiss watches you can swap just about anything they interchange. But you want to be really careful with parts swapping on American pocket watches because a lot of times the parts were hand fit. So swapping your way out of a problem may actually make new problems. Which is why we need to find out why the current parts don't work? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

American movements especially after the turn of the century were completely non-hand fitted. What can crop up is differences in grades for the same base caliber. But a part for Hamilton x caliber will fit x caliber.

   not true;  vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

   not true;  vin
Not sure on which point you disagree but interchangeability was the corner stone of U.S. watchmaking. That said many of the movements have been massacred so maybe a jewel was replaced with the wrong one and the pivot adapted or a fork that was close mashed in somehow, etc.

I've been across the pond a couple of decades but still see an American pw here and there. Last was a "maker" who recased old Elgins in wristwatch. Customer brought two of them for service (they were supposedly restored by the "maker"). Broken hs collet glued, escapement berzerked, dial glued on, balance pivots grooved, holes smashed closed, not untypical of stuff I saw regularly 20 years ago.

But aside from maybe Howard or some of more boutique manufacturers no way they were hand fitting parts at Waltham Elgin Hamilton with the production numbers they were hitting. The finishing techniques for pivots for example may have been labor intensive but they were made to standards. The U.S. smacked the swiss so hard they had spies bringing back intel on manufacturing methods. Which they improved upon, and eventually smacked back with.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reality versus the fantasy of interchangeability of American pocket watch parts? By the way if you haven't seen the video below it's quite interesting from the 30s. If you look at the video one of the reasons Elgin made so many watches was its factory was really really big. The number of people was huge was probably one of the largest companies in the world at one time as a guess. Multiple generations of Elgin families worked at the factory. So by the 1900 production methods improve machinery improves Elgin takes great pride which you can see in the video and making sure everything fits perfectly. But still a lot of and work hand fitting hand adjusting with a huge volume of people.

So the problem with this conversation as we can all pick and choose examples to make our point which doesn't necessarily help with the original problem. For instance the second link turn-of-the-century mass-produced watch. Made for a whole bunch of years listed as a model three. Go to the website you'll find a lot of 12 size model three watches. Illinois parts catalog is rather interesting the parts are listed by name of the part then on the page illustrations the size and then the model. Canon pinion for 12 size model 1 to 5 all identical. Only one part numbers listed reality they do not interchange. They may have been mass-produced in a turn-of-the-century factory but notice how there made in batches. There's still a lot of hand fitting and adjusting true they're going to be better than cottage industry European watches but.

So back to the original question swapping parts to fix the problem is a bad idea unless you know why your swapping the parts. So we think we know where the problem is let's look at those parts to see why there a problem. Then once we figure out why you have a problem what the problem is then we can figure out how to solve the problem.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ys4ChOWYNy8

http://illinoiswatchguide.com/gradeautocrat.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, vinn3 said:

   here is a story about Swiss made watches -- i heard -- it may be true:  they boasted making "the smallest watch screw" and sent it to Japan.   the Japanese drilled a hole thru it and sent it back to the Swiss !    vin

Iranians tell a similar story , Britts made and sent to Germans, a wire placed inside a strand  human hair,  Germans drilled a hole in the wire, stuffed the hole with human hair and returned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I buy non working American pocket watches, sometimes even missing parts, and resort to swapping parts routinely to get them fixed. In rare cases I have to make the part that I need because I can't find those ready available. It gets sometimes very challenging and often frustrating, but it feels good being able to make a balance staff for an old 18s watch based on hand measurements and eyeballing of what's available (old, broken staff, etc).

In the case of this watch I swapped(!) the center wheel and the problem just went away like magic. No more cycling through the rate. There is still some irregular cycling of just a few seconds/day, but that is pretty much expected on those old watches. I've used the opportunity, with the balance out of the watch to improve the beat error down to 1.6ms - I am totally happy with it. Thank you all who suggested the cycling problem to be caused by the center wheel pinions or the barrel! It was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2019 at 8:46 PM, vinn3 said:

   here is a story about Swiss made watches -- i heard -- it may be true:  they boasted making "the smallest watch screw" and sent it to Japan.   the Japanese drilled a hole thru it and sent it back to the Swiss !    vin

What I heard (60 years ago....)  They threaded it and screwed on a nut.  At one time the story involved The Americans and the Swiss.  Had to be true at some point :biggrin:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...