Jump to content

ESA 9150 Electronic Stop-Lever Spring?


MrRoundel

Recommended Posts

Greetings friends. I have an issue with an ESA9150 electronic movement from the seventies. It was fine when I put it away last year, but is acting up now. When I stashed it, I pulled the crown out in an attempt to save battery life like you can in modern quartz watches. But the problem I'm having seems connected to the balance stop-lever and how it contacts the spring at the top, the one with the ruby contact. When I put the watch in the setting position, it stops as it should, however, it won't start back up with decent motion unless I fiddle with that spring contact.

My thinking is that perhaps this movement isn't really made to tolerate keeping it in setting position, where the spring stays compressed for months or years. Maybe it fatigues the spring a bit, thereby causing my running problem.

All I have now is a video that I made back when I got it running. The spring is just above the plastic block that the stem passes through at 9:00 in the video. It fits into a slot in a little peg and presses against that balance stop arm (looks like a leg, with the foot on the balance).

Does anybody have any experience with these, and perhaps the problem I described? I'm considering putting a bit more bend back in that spring. Any help is appreciated. Thanks. Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your input, rogart63. The puzzling thing is that I don't have to twist the movement to start it running. Instead, it merely takes a "flick" or two of the spring at the top of the balance-stop lever to get it running. Would that be the case if it was out of beat?

It runs fine once I start it up, providing I don't have to set the hands. It kept great time overnight.

The only timegrapher I have is the app. that goes with my Ipad. I'll take a look to see what shows up there, providing I can remember how to work it. Thanks again. Cheers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, rogart63. I'll try that balance-swing test next time I pull the crystal. I ended up punting by setting date and time to the present before quickly casing and replacing crystal. Since it's my own watch, I can get away with such badness. :-)

After all, I shouldn't have to mess with the date until...oh crap...the end of this month when I have to deal with the short month we're in. Doh! If I was smart AND lazy, I would have set the date to compensate for that change, if possible. Oh well, I'll pop the crystal again in a couple of weeks and check it out further. I'll also brush up on using the timegrapher.

In the meantime, I have another Wittnauer electronic I bought a while back to clean. It has the later ESA9154 model in it. Thanks again.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, I made a rather nifty little tool to position the tension springs that lie beneath the train bridge like an ugly troll. I filed, pounded, and squeezed in smooth-jaw pliers, a brass tapered-pin, until it was thin enough to pass between the plastic tension wheel and the bottom of the bridge. It made quick work of it. On a microscopic level the spring may find the brass sort of "sticky", so it is easy to move the springs over to their plastic wheels.

This time I'm going to save the tool, and mark its container, so I don't have to reinvent the wheel next time. I forgot what I used to handle this last time, on the 9150. Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will advice to share the idea first here before doeing something to the movement
    • When you move the index which changes the timing from an extreme fast to an extreme slow, is there a big change in beat error? Obviously there will be a big change in timing. If there is a big difference in BE then this is strongly inferring the the end-curve of the hairspring isn't set correctly or/and the collet is central to the jewel on the balance cock, because the hairspring that is breathing between the curb pin and boot is being pushed and/or pulled when you move the index from left to right. Also not having the hairspring set correctly can dramatically reduce the amplitude. A quick check is to take power off the movement and move the index from extreme fast to slow and with high magnification see if the hairspring sits nicely between the curb pin and boot at all times (give the balance a spin and watch the hairspring - has it got total freedom?) or if it moves by being pushed or pulled by the curb pin or boot. I'm guessing it is the latter. I think that may be a possibility to your problem.
    • I can't get windingstens.com to open but you need a  few measurements. 
    • All Done, Here are the finished pictures: This one shows the generic "one-size-fits-all" base which accepts the bespoke rings - notice that the parametric movement OD (27.40 mm) automatically prints on the ring 🙂 From another angle: Here is the ring about to go into the base: And finally the base and ring together: Here it is next to a pen for scale: On my system with 20% fill each ring will take about 18 mins to print, but I am sure this could be optimised: Here is the screenshot of the spreadsheet in FreeCAD, you just need to change one value to create the ring in cell C3, (the base doesn't need any changes). I just uploaded the files to printables link here, but also include  here as a fake pdf, please change the .pdf to .zip to make the file work once downloaded: Modular Movement Holder.pdf Any feedback welcome!     I'm also going to make a parametric ring insert for rectangular/oval movements - but I just finished a parent teacher evening so too tired now 🙂  
×
×
  • Create New...