Jump to content

2824 Incabloc issue/question(s)


cedelong

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I am resurrecting an old Zodiac diver with a 2824-2 in it. When I began stripping her down, I found the balance arm was missing the inca system altogether- looks like someone tried to adjust it at some point, don't know if that had anything to do with it- and it wasn't floating around anywhere inside the case. I was able to find a replacement, but unsure how to proceed. Scoured the net for info, but tech sheet was all I could find. Oiling and chasing cap stones is the extent of my expertise...

I pulled another balance arm from a spare to check my overhaul, balance arbor intact, etc. and it works beautifully.

The spare inca came in today, but before I waste time and $, any suggestions?

1) will this even work: Is there anything in the hole that looks broken? What made it fall out in the first place? 

2) I assume it is friction-fit, but what is the correct orientation? The gold arm I used for reference, but the regulator on the white one is +++++. Needs to be centered back to neutral?

3) I assume removing the balance jewel before I put system back in the arm is a good idea? (Grin)

4) Do I need to disassemble the entire balance assembly, hairspring and all? 

5) ok, I'm clueless here. Hope the magnified pics are enough to illustrate my dilemma.

 

Much thanks in advance,

Chuck

 

2019-2-16 22-21-39.jpg

2019-2-16 22-21-15.jpg

2019-2-16 22-20-42.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The jewel housing is friction fit. Stud career arm is  a spring and snaps right on the housing, regulator arm and the other fellow( micro regulator) fits on like the other ballance cock in the pic.

You are going to remove the end stone and  the jewel anyway.Next close the incab spring in the housing slot. Fit the housing on the cock, direction of spring don,t matter.

To fit the housing, insert in and place the cock and housing inside your tweezers to press home, housing should fit snug tight.place all arms on in the correct order( as on the other cock) place the stud career arm on the housing and in between your tweezers press to snap on, you hear the clock when snap.

If you can do this without removing the ballance and stud, you have saved yourself extra pain.

Removing the ballance brings you additional challanges, unneccessary pain.

Hairspring is generally intergrated with the ballanc on these modles, not removable.

Good luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a pity the replacement is gold because you could have just do a straight swop. Providing you have a staking tool it looks like a straight forward job to me. The balance & H/S and the adjusting ring need to removed then its just about pushing the old one out & inserting the replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would proceed with caution.

It looks to me as though you're looking at a Novodiac system and not Incabloc, and that it is just the jewels and spring that are missing and not the whole setting. You may not be able to substitute the whole Novodiac setting for the Incabloc setting without some serious modification. Far simpler to buy the replacement Novodiac jewels and spring and install them with little more than tweezers, good magnification, a steady hand, a ton of patience and some good luck.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remove the dial to see the shock system on the mainplate, you get a chance to remove and clean those jewels too.

I don,t think anyone would disagree with the point mark made. 

Will you show a close up of the HS&stud connection, seems like the HS is glued or pinned to the stud. Perhaps removing the HS from the stud provides for a better approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate the advice...but I'm unclear on a few points, or maybe I wasn't clear in my post?

This movement is a 25j ETA 2824-2, not the 17j 2824.

The entire shock absorber is missing, not just the jewel and spring.

The part I purchased thru Star Time is (product code) ETA 2824.3024 "jeweled shock absorber for balance - Top" (See pic. 1)

The gold balance arm (pic 1 in my OP), with the identical Inca "double cone" system, is from a spare 2824-2.

Based on the pic and "...for economical caliburs" description, it's not a Novodiac. (See pic 2) it's an Incabloc double-cone system, or appears identical to it. (See pic 3)

UNLESS...

You are referring to the hole in the white balance arm, and it looks like a Novodiac absorber was there originally- I never saw it, was long gone before I opened it.

Pic 4 is the hole in the balance arm, installed, when I realized the jewel housing/ shock absorber assembly was missing...before I stripped it down. Tried to get detail of the hole.

Hope this makes things clearer?

Thanks again,

Chuck

 

Screenshot_20190217-125901_Chrome.thumb.jpg.25fc8710d2b2ac3531176f5a1c36d44a.jpg

 

 

Screenshot_20190217-131151_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20190217-130209_Samsung capture.jpg

2019-2-16 23-15-34.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate the advice...but I'm unclear on a few points, or maybe I wasn't clear in my post?

This movement is a 25j ETA 2824-2, not the 17j 2824.

The entire shock absorber is missing, not just the jewel and spring.

The part I purchased thru Star Time is (product code) ETA 2824.3024 "jeweled shock absorber for balance - Top" (See pic. 1)

The gold balance arm (pic 1 in my OP), with the identical Inca "double cone" system, is from a spare 2824-2.

Based on the pic and "...for economical caliburs" description, it's not a Novodiac. (See pic 2) it's an Incabloc double-cone system, or appears identical to it. (See pic 3)

UNLESS...

You are referring to the hole in the white balance arm, and it looks like a Novodiac absorber was there originally- I never saw it, was long gone before I opened it.

Pic 4 is the hole in the balance arm, installed, when I realized the jewel housing/ shock absorber assembly was missing...before I stripped it down. Tried to get detail of the hole.

Hope this makes things clearer?

Thanks again,

Chuck

 

Screenshot_20190217-125901_Chrome.thumb.jpg.25fc8710d2b2ac3531176f5a1c36d44a.jpg

 

 

Edited by cedelong
It has a Novodiac on the bottom/main plate. Marc may be right.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don,t see your point, how dose any of the facts you mentioned help us be sure both staff pivots turn inisde the same type and appropriate jewels , the two systems incab and Novodiac  may differ in number respects, different chatons, end stone.....etc. 

Staff and jewel assembly should be of the same system. Plus a housing may not fit the other cock. 

Your post shows the very evidence of two cocks/ ballance of same caliber with diferent absorber system. 

Best wishes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

It looks like the Novodiac housing. Compare the website snapshot with your close-up. You are missing the chaton, the hole-jewel, the cap-jewel and the shock-spring, i.e. the four components on the right, but not the housing pictured in the centre. Yours looks like a variant of the one shown, so check dimensions before ordering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/17/2019 at 8:44 PM, cedelong said:

This movement is a 25j ETA 2824-2, not the 17j 2824.

The entire shock absorber is missing, not just the jewel and spring.

Looks like an older thread but just for future reference.........
Even the ETA 2824-2 came in a wide range of different varieties, some with the Incablock system and some with Novodiac. I have a quite funny version too with a regular regulator arm and Incablock.
What you got is as they say a Novodiac missing its jewels and spring, no doubt about it.
Just to show the differences one can look at these two 2824-2  both from ETA.

First the 2824-2 with incablock, notice the slot for the spring on the top.

Inca-Block.thumb.jpg.ba0588def6821f73db6ef029e7d11ca9.jpg

A newer version with Novodiac system, notice the triangular slots on the top for the spring,  just like the one discussed here.

Novodiac.thumb.jpg.841dfcca5b406a3dc9c2dd3518d551cf.jpg
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • See, what has happen is a normal consequece of the reducing the hammer size and changing it's shape by the removing metal from it. But here the hammer is adjustable and just adjustment is needed to correct, and this is what You have done. There is a rule for the adjustment and it is that the hammer must lay firmly on the seconds counter heart and there should be a litle free play in the same time of the minutes counter heart/hammer which alows counter movement of about 0.5 min on the small dial hand (+/- 0.25). Of course, there is no way to make one hammer to delay from the other, as they are one single part. What has changed too is the slope of the hammer head and thus the orientation of the heart has changed, and thus the switching finger position. This led to need of the finger position correction. The rule here is that switching of the minute counter has to start when the seconds counter hand is on '59'. Of course, the seconds hand must be positioned as so the resetting is at '0' exactly. If switching is earlier than 59, there will be no problem, but it will be wrong as reading can be not correct. If the switching starts later, the problems that You described can happen.
    • Thanks, This watch was in a box of old scrape units that a friend gave me. They used to be his late father's who was a watchmaker before the war and then continued later in life. I picked this one out as it looked like it had potential, and I liked the dial, it's been a bit of a learning curve for a beginner but I was determined to get it going. Now I'm on the final lap it feels good. I'm just wondering whether to invest in a decent set of hand placement tools or stick with the cheap Chinese red thing I have, decisions decision 😆
    • An update, for everyone who contributed advice, and for those who come after with a similar problem. Based on the answers received, I decided to work on the face of the hammer first. I used a square degussit stone to guarantee a vertical surface to work against, and ground the face back until it was square across 90% of the depth. I was conscious of the risk of removing too much material.* After I'd got the shape how I wanted it, I polished the surface with lapping film. To cut a long story short, it did the trick and the hammer hasn't slipped off the cam since. Of course, that wasn't the end of my problems. Have a look at this video and tell me what you think is wrong. https://youtu.be/sgAUMIPaw98 The first four attempts show (0 to 34 sec.) the chrono seconds hand jumping forwards, the next two attempts (35 to 47 sec.) seem "normal", then on the seventh attempt (48 to 54 sec.) the seconds hand jumps to 5 sec. and the minute counter jumps to 1. The rest of the video just shows repeats of these three variants. I solved it by rotating the minute counter finger on the chronograph (seconds) runner relative to the cam.  I'd be interested to hear your opinions on that. It seemed to be the right thing to do, but maybe I've introduced another problem I'm not aware of. * What is the correct relationship between the two hammers and cams, by the way? Should both hammers strike the cams exactly at the same time, or is it correct for the minute counter hammer to be a bit behind the seconds hammer? In this picture, I removed the adjusting screw at 1, and the hammers are contacting the cams simultaneously at 3 and 4. I had to turn the screw down tight to achieve this condition after stoning the seconds hammer and replacing the bridge.
    • It was easy enough to pop off. Once I had the cannon pinion hanging on the blades of the stump, I got my #2 tweezers on the gear attached to the staff and levered it down. That way none of the force was on the brass wheel itself.   I reinstalled it and the bridge, and it looks like a small but reasonable amount of end shake. It also spins easily with a blower. It stops quickly, but I think that's due to the large shoulder and about what I'd expect from this wheel.  
    • Oh, right. For some reason I was picturing a monocoque case in my head. Good looking watch!
×
×
  • Create New...