Jump to content

Brass bearings/bushings for Andra & Zwingenberger lathe


rafau

Recommended Posts

Hi!

I was wondering if it is possible to find replacement brass bearings/bushings for my A&Z lathe? I'm afraid the front one has got worn off a bit and will need replacing soon.

I took the headstock apart and put back together a bit more stiff and it should be fine for a while.

Do you know if these elements are available to get anywhere?

 

f66e97b80b9530a3b417e812fe2a3082.jpg

 

21d124e1faf9c6e74503767d67be44ef.jpg

 

7b528ad13dc263f9af81cc797bbe32e0.jpg

 

757ff893574adeb3b3470e16c4adc578.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whats the shaft look like?   Is it the typical double taper bearing?  Sorry to be a downer, but I don't know that there is much you can do past the bearing take up which you're tried.  The shaft is likely worn so even if a part was available it likely won't mate properly.  The horse is already out of the barn, but that bearing is really dirty so its not a surprise its in trouble.  Those oil hole should be covered/capped to keep crude out.  A hydrodynamic bearing is essentially a non contact bearing, but only if clean and oiled. 

Lapping a taper requires you to carefully make and properly charge a lap - no loose abrasive!  Reason is that unlike lapping a cylinder where the laps moves back and forth through or over the work,  with a taper, the same place on the lap is always on the same place on the taper so loose abrasive will create rings and basically mess up the geometry.  With the lap as a charged cutting tool it can be done.

I've an abused Schaublin 70 hiding under the bench awaiting bearing work (same style double taper as a watchmakers lathe).  There is no more difficult thing to machine imo than two tapers perfectly mating to a small tolerance and high finish with everything perfectly concentric.  My plan is grind the shaft, lap the shaft (custom made laps) scrape the bearing (by hand) mount the bearing on the shaft and grind the bearing OD.  A big job.

 

Edited by measuretwice
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahh.. Thanks for your responses. Yes, it's a typical one. I think I will give up messing about that bearing. The lathe looks nasty and abused without a doubt but I'm still able to turn balance staffs for pocket watches an winding stems for both pocket and wrist watches. I bought it two weeks ago since it was a real bargain for this machine and a chest of equipment. It will get cleaned soon and greased with proper oil. Unfortunately, the oil holes caps are missing. The bed, the headstock are solid mounted on the base and it all feels like a monolith :) The thing I'm worried about is that bearing, but as long as it works, it's ok if I can't replace it. If it gets out of use, I still have two other lathes :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well if it works, that's something.   i'm usually the charge in and make parts and fix it sort, but doing these bearing arrangements properly presents challenges.   Many companies figured it out and 10's of thousands of lathes were made so its not exactly a moon launch, but still, the trick to it alludes me.  I suspect its something like a series of very precise custom laps, male and female.  A lap btw should never wear out - that is the properly charged variety vs the loose abrasive type.  So its conceivable that this is how its done, making the laps would be very challenging, but they laps would be an investment used to make 100's of lathes.  It would prohibitive to make a series of super precise male and female laps for one lathe.  I'd to love get to meet and discuss this with someone who knew how the lathe makers went about this.

Edited by measuretwice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would it be possible to replace with a different bearing type?

I presume there is a reason why this type of bearing was used originally, but is there no modern alternative that could be used to substitute, even if it means sleeving up or skimming down the existing shaft, or packing the replacement bearing in some manner.

When all is said and done, we are simply trying to ensure a shaft rotates in a controlled manner and doesn't wander around, within certain lateral and longitudinal tolerances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all ears if you have suggestions, but I can't think of anything. 

Saying its just a shaft rotating is easy enough, but do get it to do so to the tolerances required and take both axial and radial load is far from trivial.  the double taper design is used so extensively because its just such a perfect solution.  Without a cylindrical grinder, you can't just skim the shaft down as its hardened (or it should be).  You could however stone out minor damage but you're not changing its overall form factor without a grinder.   The real change though is what to put in there for a bearing if not the double taper?   I don't know of another plain bearing arrangement that takes the thrust and radial force.  No rolling element bearings are remotely going have a small enough profile and even if they did, a $500 P4 set of angular contact bearings may not still have the low runout as a watchmakers lathe (and of course wouldn't fit anyway).

The only way I can see coming at  is as I'm thinking of doing for the Schaublin:  clean up the shaft and hand scrape a bearing to it.  It will be accurate, if done in the sequence I envision, buts its a fair bit work.  That I haven't thought of them hardly means there aren't other ways, but I haven't seen them yet and I've asking and questioning for awhile trying to come up with a plan for the sad Schuablin.  The OP says he has other lathes so perhaps that is a possibility.

This is also predicated on the objective being performance such s TIR that is good as typical watch lathe in good repair, which imo is a requirement. 

 

 

 

Edited by measuretwice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a bronze bearing machine like this the spindle probably has some scoring but a light stoning should be enough to get it serviceable. Then like measure says, its a scraping job. Doesn't even have to be perfect, just pretty good and it'll be running true as new, maybe a reduced service life, like 10,000 hours instead of 25-30,000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...