Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I’m working on a Longines with a 2892A2 movement. All cleaned and oiled, what sort of amplitude should I expect to achieve? I’m hitting 230/240 dial down and 210ish dial up on a full wind. I’m guessing it should be hitting 300?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just some thoughts about the amplitude in the 28XX series. 

To get maximal amplitude before regulating these beauties I use to let it take some time. If one follow the oiling scheme in the tech notes one should get a quite good amplitude. 

The important step in the process is to let the movement run for at least a day or two before starting regulating the movement with a time graph. If you measure the amplitude just after servicing you will get a lower reading which is natural. To get maximum lubrication one have to let it get worked in and spread out on the surfaces.

To gain maximum amplitude on these ETA Movements or any one else I guess it is of most importance to learn how to oil/grease the jewels on the pallet fork with for example Moeibus 9415. In my experience this boosts the amplitude significant.

To get an amplitude of 300 one have to do the complete service including main spring change.

When I get the amplitude to 280 or higher i begin the regulating work.

Hope these observations can help you in some way.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try to remember to demagnetise the movement and the tools you are going to use first. It can save you a lot of time.

Good advice!

Just some thoughts about the amplitude in the 28XX series. 

To get maximal amplitude before regulating these beauties I use to let it take some time. If one follow the oiling scheme in the tech notes one should get a quite good amplitude. 

The important step in the process is to let the movement run for at least a day or two before starting regulating the movement with a time graph. If you measure the amplitude just after servicing you will get a lower reading which is natural. To get maximum lubrication one have to let it get worked in and spread out on the surfaces.

To gain maximum amplitude on these ETA Movements or any one else I guess it is of most importance to learn how to oil/grease the jewels on the pallet fork with for example Moeibus 9415. In my experience this boosts the amplitude significant.

To get an amplitude of 300 one have to do the complete service including main spring change.

When I get the amplitude to 280 or higher i begin the regulating work.

Hope these observations can help you in some way.


Thanks HSL.

I haven’t changed the MS on this one, looked ok though of course it’s not new.

I have just started using 9415 on the pallets so again the qualifier is that I may not be brilliant at doing this yet.

I’m up at 240 now. Hadn’t thought about letting it run for 24 hours, that makes perfect sense so thanks for the advice.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, oldhippy said:

https://forums.watchuseek.com/f2/eta-chart-basic-details-eta-2824-2-2892-a2-7750-a-513566.html

You have to be careful when you look at a chart like that in that it doesn't explain the numbers? A better source of information is the manufacturing info sheet for the watch which I'm attaching. So specifically the minimum amplitude is after running 24 hours.

ETA 2892-A2 of manufacturing info.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I let the movement run from a full wind straight after reassembly (which was showing at around 240amp and about +1spd) for around 24 hours and measured the following:
890fc4dea7710769f8b425b3cdafd86a.jpg

My thoughts on next steps are:
1. Disassemble and re-clean pivots and holes
2. Give the balance another dip in Perk
3. Do the oiling from scratch
4. Re-clean and reapply 9415 to the pallets

Anything I’m missing? Could this be down to the MS which I did nothing with apart from opening the cap and applying a spot of fresh grease to the barrel floor and lid and a drop of oil over the coils. I’m now wondering if that was a poor decision.

TIA
Pip



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You didn't mention what other lubricants you are using for the rest of the watch?

Then minor problem with 9415 a little is good too much is bad Omega has an interesting guideline for lubricating the pallet fork and it's depending upon the conditions of previous lubricants specifically whether is lubricated with Lubrifar As that changes the lubrication. But in any case they apply of very tiny little drop than 24 hours verify it meets their specifications and the use of 40 power microscope. So a very tiny bit a lubricated is important too much is bad but that's more of a high performance thing I doubt it's what affecting you unless you put huge blobs on.

I don't suppose you know the service history of the watch its prior condition before you serviced it?

Then I was rereading the entire discussion timing you did dial-up and dial down there was a discrepancy does the discrepancies still exist? Then you gave a dial-up and dial down you didn't give any of the pendant positions like wristwatch typically crown down what's that doing?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You didn't mention what other lubricants you are using for the rest of the watch?
Then minor problem with 9415 a little is good too much is bad Omega has an interesting guideline for lubricating the pallet fork and it's depending upon the conditions of previous lubricants specifically whether is lubricated with Lubrifar As that changes the lubrication. But in any case they apply of very tiny little drop than 24 hours verify it meets their specifications and the use of 40 power microscope. So a very tiny bit a lubricated is important too much is bad but that's more of a high performance thing I doubt it's what affecting you unless you put huge blobs on.
I don't suppose you know the service history of the watch its prior condition before you serviced it?
Then I was rereading the entire discussion timing you did dial-up and dial down there was a discrepancy does the discrepancies still exist? Then you gave a dial-up and dial down you didn't give any of the pendant positions like wristwatch typically crown down what's that doing?
 


You are right, I didn’t, so this is what was used:
9010; 1300; 9415; and a dab of 8201 on the barrel floor and cap. All from Moebius and all reasonably new.
The parts were US cleaned (small cheap domestic one I have) in small glass jars in a 40/60 mix of lighter fluid and white spirit and then rinsed in IPA before drying. The pallet was cleaned manually with pegwood and Rodico. The balance complete was dipped and very lightly agitated in Perc (perchloroethylene) and suspended and left to air dry. The cap jewels and holders we’re removed and agitated in Perc before further manual cleaning and oiling with 9010 and reinstalling.





Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you pegging your jewels? They really need to be spotlessly clean. In particular do the hole jewels for the pallet fork, and push the fork end (the slot) into brand new pithwood a few times. Check that no particules clung to it too. Roller jewel should be spotless.

 

Many (most) folks, even experienced professionals, often go for the mainspring when the problem is elsewhere. Yes, the barrel really does need to be in good order and clean but in my experience on modern pieces if the spring looks good and the barrel isn't eaten up where it rides the arbor or the wall (autos) amplitude worries come from other places. In a 2892 there's kinda "one spring", but on other older calibers it's usually possible to put a stronger spring in. It's a bad practice if it's compensating other correctable faults.

 

One small possibility in your case is the lubrication you've added to the barrel is letting it slip too much. Nonetheless I'd expect more amplitude especially after just winding up. You need a braking grease for the barrel wall, and theoretically no lube on tbe spring as its teflon coated.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you pegging your jewels? They really need to be spotlessly clean. In particular do the hole jewels for the pallet fork, and push the fork end (the slot) into brand new pithwood a few times. Check that no particules clung to it too. Roller jewel should be spotless.

 

Yes, I’m pegging the jewels and cleaning the hole jewels. However, maybe I am not doing it well enough. I’ll up my mag to x40 and try and take and post some pics to see what you guys think. As I think I stated earlier, my suspicion is that what I think I’m getting clean properly, I’m not. I’d like to crack this though as gaining amplitude is something I need to perfect to satisfy my need to become a better watchmaker.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/3/2019 at 11:07 AM, Pip said:

I haven’t changed the MS on this one, looked ok though of course it’s not new.

6 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

Many (most) folks, even experienced professionals, often go for the mainspring when the problem is elsewhere. Yes, the barrel really does need to be in good order and clean but in my experience on modern pieces if the spring looks good and the barrel isn't eaten up where it rides the arbor or the wall (autos) amplitude worries come from other places. I

So regarding the mainspring did you remove it from the barrel and did you clean it? If the mainspring in a prior servicing had been lubricated with some lubrication then we really can't assume that the spring is not going to be a source of a problem. Modern mainsprings come prelubricated so no lubrication is required on the spring itself. Breaking grease is required on the outer wall. If you'd remove the cap and the mainspring look clean other than lubricating the arbor if you didn't want to fool with it you would've probably been okay. But if you saw lubrication on the spring attempted to clean it without Removing the spring that's not going to be successful and then trying to put grease on it after the fact that may or may not work either. So with a watch that is having an amplitude problem mainsprings can be an issue. Not so much because thay are going to be set or go bad mainly because Of the possibility of sticky lubrication.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So regarding the mainspring did you remove it from the barrel and did you clean it? I
 

MS not removed from barrel. Just inspected and a little bit of barrel grease (8201) applied and a couple of small drops of HP1300 placed on top of spring.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here are some photos. It’s amazing how much crap you see at 40+
I used my microscope at 40x and then used my phone to take the pics at between x1 and x8 so there are some close ups. Quality isn’t as good as through my stereo scope of course and forgive the reflection of the ring light. Oh, and I’ve not disassembled to take close ups of the pivots tonight as it’s already after 11pm here and I have to clear all my kit up yet! Oh for a dedicated workspace...

Cap jewel hairspring side
b9b380e7b4bc57f3593fa532edf3fef1.jpg

Cap jewel dial side
1efee3fdf046a1d831a22ac047910f22.jpg

Pallets, one from each side
b86cf945c1d680d55884e5e071704096.jpg
0150db22846f505b6287a44edbc038c0.jpg what is that blob after it’s been run from full wind to nothing? That can’t be good, which means maybe we’ve found something!

Some other jewel holes
ab282e2903319193d1b45771162c9aba.jpg
b874c600c75d940ae63627caea1c0c80.jpg
f37fe169cafca6c6b06ecd0a66c68973.jpg


That should be enough to give an idea. I’m totally up for any criticism as I need to know what to do better. I simply must be able to be better at this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I repeat this many time here, but with modern watches, they tend to have finer pivots and less overall torque which means that the faster end of the train must be perfectly clean to run well. In my opinion it's less likely that a significant loss of amplitude is a result of dirt bearings towards the barrel end of the train. It will affect it, but not as much.

Two simple tests I like to conduct in situations like these:

Run the mainspring down and remove the balance and pallets. Now turn the crown a little and observe the train running free. If it is running with very low friction then the escape wheel will recoil backwards immediately after it has come to a halt.

Place the balance back in the watch without the pallets. Excite the balance and observe how long it takes to come to a rest. If it's running with little friction then it should oscillate for a good minute or two. If it stops after a short amount of time then you know you have a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I repeat this many time here, but with modern watches, they tend to have finer pivots and less overall torque which means that the faster end of the train must be perfectly clean to run well. In my opinion it's less likely that a significant loss of amplitude is a result of dirt bearings towards the barrel end of the train. It will affect it, but not as much.
Two simple tests I like to conduct in situations like these:
Run the mainspring down and remove the balance and pallets. Now turn the crown a little and observe the train running free. If it is running with very low friction then the escape wheel will recoil backwards immediately after it has come to a halt.
Place the balance back in the watch without the pallets. Excite the balance and observe how long it takes to come to a rest. If it's running with little friction then it should oscillate for a good minute or two. If it stops after a short amount of time then you know you have a problem.


Can you explain what you mean by excite the balance please? Do you mean to use my blower to get it moving or maybe to turn it manually to a certain degree?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Balance took 1m 16s to come to a complete rest. There is a very slight backlash, and I do mean very slight, on the escape. More often than not though it just halts.

Can you tell anything about the jewels from the pics above? Do they look about right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion there should be more oil on the pallet stones. Have a look at the BHI lubrication guide. However, it should run well with that amount only. 

Did you use an actual breaking grease on the mainspring and did the barrel wall show signs of wear?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mainspring was only light touch.
Thanks for everyone’s help and encouragement; I got the amp up to near on 300 with 0.0 BE and +1 to +6 spd according to my TG. I’m very happy with that so it’s been cased and final test before return to its owner.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Mainspring was only light touch.
Thanks for everyone’s help and encouragement; I got the amp up to near on 300 with 0.0 BE and +1 to +6 spd according to my TG. I’m very happy with that so it’s been cased and final test before return to its owner.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Phil, what did you conclude was the culprit?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That would be something! Which brings me back to;  
    • you think you're going to sleep tonight you're not, you're going to ponder the question of what makes you think those of the right parts?  
    • Does anyone knows what size case a need for a dial diameter 20.60mm?
    • Sounds like the story with my Rolex. Poor (expensive) job done by an official Rolex dealer with an "in-house" watchmaker, hence I learned watchrepair and did the servicing myself. Same story as I learned with the Omega 861, again poor job by an "in-house" watchmaker by an official Omega dealer. Once your watch goes through that back-door, you have no idea what is going to happening to it 🫣   Quite nice that they sent back the parts which had been replaced !
    • yes that's definitely not right at all. I have a picture one of my friends has a Omega coaxial there was having issues to lose asking me where he should send it. As that's a specialty watch I suggested the service center. When he got it back he sent me a picture so the replace the dial as you can see the hands the mainspring barrel and I think the price was really quite decent considering all the stuff they can replace. So I do know they do change the barrels but the other person I worked at the service center when I would ask questions and unfortunately I can't remember all the answers. I think a lot of the changing a parts is at the discretion of the watchmaker. Plus I don't know enough about the chronographs and whether that would be considered a vintage watch? I take some of the vintage watches may have been sent directly to Switzerland or another service center. Obviously with a watch like the one down below they probably have a infinite supply of parts is its relatively modern vintage stuff becomes more interesting even the watch companies don't have necessarily infinite supply of parts. But no matter what the watch shouldn't disintegrated six months that's definitely an issue.        
×
×
  • Create New...