Jump to content

Should I be worried about radium?


Recommended Posts

I'm posting this here as I think it will be of interest to anyone working with radium dials and watches.


I would suggest that there is actually very little measurable risk from handling a few radium watch hands, so long as you wash your own hands afterwards, and make sure that you don't grind up significant amounts of the material and release it in to the air.  The point here being that you would need significant amounts. Grams of dust, not a few microgrammes. 

You have to bear in mind that the materials involved are indeed radioactive, and that they present a hazard, but that hazard is a cumulative one. In other words the radiation they produce would need to be present for a considerable period of time and in significant amounts to produce a measurable statistical risk.

In the environment around us at all times, there are similar levels of radioactive materials to the amount you would be encountering in a watch hand.

Even the humble banana is very very very slightly radioactive, due to the fact that it is a good source of potassium (which we need for our biological health), some of which is naturally radioactive.

We are perfectly capable of dealing with the tiny amount of damage this radiation does.

We probably receive far more DNA damage walking around on a nice sunny day in the snow, from ultraviolet light. Our biology is designed to deal with this in the same way that we deal with a cut finger or any other damage.

Radiation damage from alpha and beta emitters (like radium) is generally very low level. The harm would come if you treated the stuff the same way the Radium Girls, who painted radium dials for a living did. They absorbed many millions of times more radium than you would ever be exposed to from a few minutes directly handling the radium in a few watch hands.

I've posted the chart below a few times, but it is relevant. I would estimate your dose from staying in the room where a few watch hands have been exposed to the elements for a few hours, would not even be measurable. It certainly wouldn't increase background levels by any significant amount.

image.thumb.png.556c023c6ecfc2ce9978402eff748c36.png

 

If, for a dare, you were crazy enough to eat the watch hands,  you would mainly ingest some steel, some zinc sulphide and a tiny amount of radium. You would excrete the majority of the radium, but a tiny tiny amount of an already tiny amount *might* be absorbed, but you would probably absorb more radioactivity from eating a few bananas. The most dangerous thing about eating them might be from the obvious risk of eating sharp bits of metal. I am obviously not advocating eating watch hands, radioactive or otherwise.

If you have already cleaned up the surfaces that might have had a few micrograms of radium on them, then you will be unlikely to be able to measure any increase in background radiation levels.

If you were still concerned, then take some measurements with a Geiger counter of the general background radiation elsewhere. In the kitchen for an hour, in the garden for an hour, in your workplace perhaps for an hour, and get a good feeling for what is normal, then re-measure in the area that you are worried about. I would doubt if you can detect anything above background.

Even if the area seems to have slightly higher levels than normal,  this may still be normal, and may have existed prior to your watch hand work.  Take a look at the above chart and you will see that you need significantly higher levels to warrant concern.
 

If you live in Aberdeen for example, or Devon, or anywhere that there is granite in the local geology, then you will naturally be exposed to slightly higher levels of radiation from uranium, radon and other naturally occurring radioactive materials than you would in say Dover which is geologically mainly chalk and limestone.

This does not lead to any significant risk. Aberdonians do not grow two heads or glow in the dark as a result.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're all exposed to risks of all types throughout our working lives, some obviously more than others, but we do take them on a consistent basis without giving it a second thought most days. If you drive a car there's a huge risk involved. I saw a head-on collision just last night right in front of me and I've been slammed into more than once by drivers paying little or no attention. I work with toxic lumber nearly every day, some more toxic than others, but all wood particles are known carcinogens and throughout my working years have been exposed to a long list of toxic chemicals, even sprayed paint with radioactive isotopes mixed into it (I was unaware of it until I bothered reading the MSDS and quit shortly thereafter) not to mention autobody fumes from bondo, paint and other substances as well as metal working shops. The point being if it's a concern to you take whatever precautions you deem reasonable and if you're not sure don't fool with it until you are sure, but just getting out of bed, taking the train or bus to work involves risks that can get you killed without warning.    We pays our money and takes our chances as a friend once told me.

Edited by amello
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I was pondering this topic again this morning.  Here is another Radiation dose chart that looks like similar data as above but formatted differently.  I am also posting a document produced by the NRC.  A screen capture of the most interesting page that relates to watches and watchmakers is also posted here.

My Dad worked on watches six days a week, 51 weeks a year from 1947 to 1980 (he continued working after 1980 but only a few days per week).  There was radium lume for re-luming hands and dials in his watchbench for that entire time until last year when I removed it.  He lived 92 years.  Cause of death was a combination of blood loss and heart failure. Until the last year, he lived a full and active life.  He was prone to use those nasty chemicals to kill bugs in the yard...that were later banned.

I don't think, anecdotally, that radium had any observable effect on him.

radiation_chart_3.jpg

2021-03-31 09_46_37-Radium exposure.pdf - Foxit Reader.png

Radium exposure.pdf

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The radium craze permeated almost every aspect of American society, it featured in everything from religious sermons to cartoons and films. It became a plot device in novels and influenced the naming of consumer products ranging from fertilizers to cigarettes to cosmetics. There was even a nightclub in Brooklyn called ‘The Radium Club’ and casinos began playing radium roulette played in the dark with a ball and roulette wheel painted with glowing radium. The extreme rarity of radium made it a prestige item, in 1903 the New York Times reported that a single gram cost $2,000. This rarity coupled with the element’s ability to glow in the dark captured the public’s imagination. Business soon began to capitalise on this popularity using radium as a selling point for everything from make-up to butter. While many of these products didn’t actually include any radium, others did.   Radium’s medical applications were touted by many doctors and scientists and the radioactive metal became associated with rejuvenation and invigoration. A slew of products began to be sold by quack doctors including ‘radium emanators’ and tablets like Radione which were advertised to enthuse ordinary water with radium’s ‘life-giving’ properties. However, it was a seemingly insignificant product, a watch with a luminous face, which would expose the horrifying dangers of radium misuse.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

There was a water dispenser called a "Revigator" that had radium and supposed to have health benefits.  I had one.  Buried it.

Here's an extract from Radium USA . Radium water was drunk by the rich and famous, not by the working-class girls from Newark. It was a bit of a craze in American life. The element was dubbed “liquid sunshine,” and it lit up not just the hospitals and drawing rooms of America but its theaters, musical halls, grocery stores, and bookshelves. A song entitled “Radium Dance” became a huge hit after being in the Broadway musical Pif ! Paf ! Pouf! On sale were radium jock straps and lingerie, radium butter, radium milk, radium toothpaste (guaranteeing a brighter smile with every brushing), and even radium-laced face creams, soaps, and compact powders. There was the “Radium Eclipse Sprayer” that “quickly kills all flies, mosquitos, roaches” and “has no equal as a cleaner of furniture, porcelain, and tile. It is harmless to humans and easy to use.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the alarming aspects of this is that radium used on an industrial scale like this presumably resulted in the disposal of large volumes of contaminated scrap and incinerated materials. This was often done on site, without any documentation or thoughts for the environment. One or two radium painted dials may not present any significant hazard, but the large scale disposal of waste associated with these industries does, and as such it also presents a major clean up headache.

I've posted about the glowing beaches of Delgety bay before, and also about Timex Dundee paying a contractor to dispose of dial waste drums in the North sea. Allegedly they were simply hurled from the side of a fishing boat into the Tay estuary, where they no doubt are slowly making their way into the environment.   

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-23098001

https://www.researchgate.net/project/Construction-Site-Health-and-Safety-Dealing-with-Radium-in-site-remediation
 

There is nothing particularly unique to Scotland about these activities. I have no doubt this sort of practice went on around the world in whatever areas radium and other materials of this nature were being processed and used. Out of site, out of mind seems to have been the overriding driving force behind this disposal. Get rid of it in some "remote" place and nobody will notice. Keep the financial costs low and to hell with the environmental consequences.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Wife and I just watched "Radium Girls" last night. Crazy Coincidence.  Based on past true events. Not a terrible flick. I have a few Ingraham and Westclox "dollar watch" vintage pocketwatches that have the stuff on em. When I dismantled and serviced them i was careful to wear regular exam gloves, I didn't handle the dial any more than I had to, and washed my hands when I got done. The only time I had pause was thinking about the tragic history and people lost associated with the stuff. 

Thanks for the valuable info shared tho. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I only have one watch in my collection which has radium lume (a 1956 Omega) but rightly or wrongly I do worry about wearing it. I've read most of the posts on this thread and the conclusion seems to be that there is a risk but it's low and most of the risk comes from lume dust if you open the watch. I don't intend to open the case and I only wear it occasionally for a few hours at a time.

I believe, but correct me if I'm wrong, that you need a licence in the UK to handle radioactive materials. 

So my questions is: Are there any UK watchmakers willing or able to remove the radium lume from the hands and hour markers? I would consider going down this route if it was possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • jdm unpinned this topic
  • 1 month later...

I was wondering about whether professional watchmakers actually have a geiger counter in their toolbox.

I spent over a good hour last week googling all about this and realised the more I read the more diverse opinions i'd get on the safety of working with old radium lumed dials.

Some say the exposure risk is minimum and others say you might as well be writing your own death warrant lol.

Do any of you professionals out there however keep a geiger counter in your repairs toolbox or do you just assume every old watch from before the mid 70s is radioactive if it's lumed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

😆 Would you still need lumed watchface dials if you did glow in the dark lol?

I am guessing like a lot of things in life. Some truth and some overhype, and whilst the risk is obviously there, its a matter of exposure, care and caution. It's not like you would be putting the tips of paint brushes in your mouth like those poor radium girls.

Lume replacement would be the most dangerous thing I am thinking when working with these dials. You wouldn't want the dust inhaled or absorbed/eaten via the airways and mouth.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like OH I have been around a long time and never had a problem and I dont glow either.  Its a question of common sense. If you are going to chew watch hands you have a problem if you treat it with care knowing the problem exists and take the required precautions you wont glow either.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • jdm pinned this topic

So if you are going to do a restoration, lets make this a totally hypothetical situation and lets say something 1950s, and it's going to be a complete restoration but the old radium lume is totally well past its used by date but still stuck onto the dial... would you guys do a safe removal and replace with modern lume or leave it? I just wonder what pros do in a situation like that.

Edited by WatchingOracle
spelling error
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I bought a 50s Rotary with radium hands/dial - pinging nicely on the Geiger counter 😧

Most of the radium is in the hands - which I will replace (taking all necessary precautions), but I'm not sure what to do with the dial.
Should I leave it as is (with radiation probably not much higher than that of background), or remove it ?

The radium on the numbers should come off with water, hopefully not damaging the dial, leaving the black number outlines.
I could just leave it at that, or try and replace the lume, which looks difficult.

I have a similar looking Universal Geneve : On that I replaced the hand lume, but left the dial as original. 
But as this is a cheapish watch I'm thinking it might be better to risk removing all the radium, then it's safer to wear and I can sell it as a non-radium watch.

(BTW I bought it because it was cheap and an old ETA 1256 movement, which I haven't seen before. I will re-plate that case!)

dial.thumb.jpg.8758ff824440c1899bd597ab4871106d.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/3/2016 at 6:14 PM, dman2112 said:

Hello all,

I recently services a 1948 Glycine Bienne and it is in mint condition.  It is running beautifully and it has zero beat error and is running +2 sec per day.  I want to keep it, but I am concerned about the Radium.  Mayne I am being paranoid, but does anyone have any thoughts on this?  Should I sell it?

Any advice or experience with this would be greatly appreciated.

 

dman2112

I would not work on a radium dial....my videos

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 The food we eat is often contaminated by radioactivety surrounding us. I don't think handling or even wearing a watch with radium emitting nuclei poses any danger.

 You are recieving background radiation as you read this post. Just don't ingest a large amount of radioactive luminant.

Regs 

Joe

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

 The food we eat is often contaminated by radioactivety surrounding us. I don't think handling or even wearing a watch with radium emitting nuclei poses any danger.

 You are recieving background radiation as you read this post. Just don't ingest a large amount of radioactive luminant.

Regs 

Joe

I posted an article and some graphics about watches and radium somewhere on this forum. After my thorough research, I concluded that it is of no concern. Don't lick a dial or hands. Don't flake it off and inhale it. 

Anecdotally, my Dad worked on radium watches every day for 30 years. He died at 93...no indication of radium sickness. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to work in a experimental reactor owned and operated by UNION CARBIDE. Did my own experiments as well as many assigned to me by my superiors.

Used to measure my exposure everyday, before and after appraoching the reactor, often spent hours near the core. My exposure never got close to alerting level. 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

There are plenty of my fellow nerds on here, so I imagine at least a few of you have already seen today's XKCD. If not:

www.xkcd.com for the latest

https://xkcd.com/2568/ if you're reading this in the future for the specific cartoon in question. FYI, all XKCD cartoons have a bonus punchline if you hover your mouse over the image in the mouseover text. 

It's not directly applicable to the topic at hand, but it sent me down a rabbit hole until I found this (they sell modern spinthariscopes if you're interested):

https://unitednuclear.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=2_76&products_id=487

I don't know what it will do to assuage any concerns, but it will tell you if there's anything at all you might be concerned about to whatever degree you have decided is warranted. Might be able to give you a clue to the magnitude of the concern/non-concern in question if you've looked at enough dials to get a feel for what's "normal". I have a bunch of steel stock I rescued from dumpster at a decommissioning hospital when I worked at a software startup located in the former finance office (long story there) that I've always worried might be radioactive. I recall reading a while back about a rash of recycled steel coming out of China that was wildly radioactive due to its past life in medical equipment, so if you work with metal on a more macro scale at all, another potential use.

There is a consolidated mess of a thread about radium and radiation, so there is clearly some interest in the subject. Mods, please do not add this to the thread. That will make this information unsearchable, impossible to find, and it will disappear forever into the void that is the forum storage device, costing Mark money while returning nothing to community.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 There is a  HTGR ( high temperature gas cooled reactor) in Colrado where sprctre lives, at fort saint verain to be exact, thats the worlds only high temp  gas cooled reactor, folks up there are used to logging their daily exposure and playing jokes on us whenever they like,  just to scare us to death     L o L 

But don't you worry, i ain't seen hair grow on palm of no ones hand over there. 🤠

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

@spectre6000, you are a trouble maker. Next thing you are gonna tell me is that 5G will not melt my brain or not turn me into an automaton.  I am on 5G now and fear that I ma

And yet... Here we are in the junk drawer, taking up server space six pages into a thread that no one will get past the second page of.

4 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

 There is a  HTGR ( high temperature gas cooled reactor) in Colrado where sprctre lives, at fort saint verain to be exact, thats the worlds only high temp  gas cooled reactor, folks up there are used to logging their daily exposure and playing jokes on us whenever they like,  just to scare us to death     L o L 

But don't you worry, i ain't seen hair grow on palm of no ones hand over there. 🤠

Had to look that up. Was decommissioned back in 1989, and is currently a natural gas power generation facility. I lived in the northeast corner of Longmont, nearly due west a few miles of that facility for a few years.

There's also Rocky Flats, a former nuclear weapons manufacturing location that's now just a grassy field and some foreboding signs. Lots of issues with leaks and spills over the years however long ago turns out. I used to live due west of that as well up in Coal Creek Canyon, and drove by one side or another every time I went anywhere. Fortunately in the instance here (for me and other mountain residents, not all the people in the suburbs down there), prevailing winds along the face of the mountains are almost always easterly, and quite strong. I was a few miles away and a few K' higher.

Most interesting thing about my current location is that the nearest "town" is the ghost town where Alferd "The Colorado Cannibal" Packer lived his final days. Also, Colorado's "oldest family nudist resort" is within walking distance. Never been. Heard.... things.

Funny full circling, when I first moved to Colorado a decade ago, there was a billboard advertising said nudist resort on my way into Boulder... Right in front of Rocky Flats! Had no idea where it was, and never gave it another thought until we bought our current house and learned that it was up the road.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a very sad day for the industry.. For most of us being amateurs the cost of replacing parts for ETA,s etc will be beyond affordability for the customers.   see full statement below   We have now received the decision from Judge Michael Green on whether or not the High Court has jurisdiction to hear our claim against Swatch, and sadly it is not the decision we had hoped for.   As we have pointed out in previous news items (see below),the rules that Judge Green had to apply strictly prevented him from examining in any way how the Swiss Court arrived at its verdict, even if it is blatantly obvious that the verdict is wrong.   As Swatch’s lawyer was summing up in the last few minutes oft he hearing, the Judge twice pinned him asking if it was alright if, as a result of the Swiss verdict, consumers had to pay 50% more for their watch repairs. After some stumbling, their lawyer’s reply was “Yes”, so  I am quite sure that Judge Green left his court fully aware that the Swiss verdict does not reflect the norms of British Competition Law. However, the rules simply do not allow him to take that simple fact into account.   Judge Green noted that our two arguments relating firstly to British Competition Law now being different from that of the EU, and secondly to the contention that the legality of the Authorised Service Networks has not been tested, had both been mentioned in the Swiss verdict. Because they had been mentioned, he felt that to allow us to argue them again would constitute re examining the Swiss case, and could not be allowed.   As to our claim that we were denied our right to be heard because our evidence was not considered, our lawyers had argued that the evidence we provided could not have been looked at because had the Swiss Court done so, it could not have reached the conclusion that it did. In his verdict, Judge Green highlighted general statements in the Swiss verdict that evidence had been looked at, and acknowledged the arguments we made to him, but again he considered that this was re-examining the Swiss verdict, and could not be permitted.   Our case has attracted considerable interest within the Legal community, and within minutes of the decision being made public we were approached for comment by one of the largest subscription news services, Global Competition Review. They asked us two very pertinent questions, and I reproduce them for you below along with our responses, as they neatly summarise the consequences arising from our case.   What are the key takeaways?   Enormous damage has been done to the fundamentals of UK and European Competition Law by the Swiss courts. It has always been the case that the effect on consumers and competition has to be considered in any decision making, but we now have a ruling that states even monopolists can remove wholesale markets from the supply chain without any consumer benefit based justification. Those entities looking to subvert Competition Law and exploit consumers for their own benefit will be looking at this very carefully.   Has the court made the wrong decision? If so, will you appeal?   The issue lies not with the High Court, but rather with cross border jurisdiction treaties that have no requirement in them for foreign jurisdictions applying UK law to take account of the Ratio Legis [a legal term for the fundamental reasoning why the law was written] of that law, and have no remedy within them for UK Courts to overcome decisions that clearly do not.    After eight years of work, and a very considerable sum in legal costs, I can not begin to tell you how disappointed I am at this outcome. For the time being, there is no further route through the British Courts that Cousins can follow. However, I promised that we would fight to the end, and that promise stands.   The UK is no longer part of the Lugano Convention, whose rules Judge Green has applied, and as yet nothing permanent has replaced it. The political tide turned against repair prevention by restricting supply of spare parts some time ago, and our efforts on behalf of the Watch Repair industry have resulted in high level contacts within several Government Departments. You can be sure that we will keep working to overcome this unjust situation that we now all find ourselves in.    I will keep you advised.   Kind regards   Anthony
    • Dell fancy a challenge🤣   https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/285785684626?itmmeta=01HT29WVJY21Q94C73GYHGBTFX&hash=item428a277a92:g:15YAAOSwNRVmBAUz&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA0DIe4QLQBW66rSyIMiyBuk8GY%2B86pQ%2BQnxGbcNq7egAGe5DIs9YMmiWJIbZtMSxwNJIiJxuojbq523IeUSBQ6pJEIQ0tfz2ChrBR03BksmKINyklg1IK4GAfAcYY9Hta9wVeSZSZN7ZCNAfZTgKs9c4%2BUIUZ3Qjc3QjUXDn2uPRo1FiYOEewMG5A26EXb%2BclBgrqtbOmM6P3bea%2F8ZImOAXNI1HtbmtMk84pIGoM6ISwaM1PKFuADtTFMccS5e3ZjndCbXYXHrW3CecsV0edw3M%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR8q588nQYw Darwin’s theory of evolution has not been proven to be absolutely.  😀 
    • A already know the size movement I have the problem is the dial a had purchased has a dimension 20.6mm wide a want to find a watch case that going to fit the dial perfectly 
    • Hi.  I would like to take issue here regarding battery driven , watches, clocks,etc. I will and do repair these clocks in fact I have sever al in my collection as well as the regular mechanical ones. I have one on my mantle piece over 60 years old tha belonged to my wife’s Aunt,  long gone Iam afraid and it has been cleaned etc and never missed a beat and is accurate. Every one has their preduices as regards Electrical /electronic Horology but I regard it as part of the progress time line of the art of Horology and to be treated as such. Like Darwin’s theory of evolution it evolved.  Two cavemen knocking rocks together and a shard broke off , looking at it he worked out if it was stuck on the end of a stick he would have a spear. Likewise his pal seeing what he was up to picked up a piece  and did the same, now that’s evolution. Some clockmaker decided to build a clock that ran with a battery and no spring to wind up and break, progress and both the mechanical and battery driven clocks evolved, the battery ones got better to the point that if it broke you changed the complete unit. Likewise watches did the same but both can be repaired by people who approach Horology with an open mind without preduice.  We all have our likes and dislikes bu I for one would never dismiss any technology because I don’t like it.   The mobile phone is a good example of modern technology at work as is the automotive industry. There buttons and switches in my car I don’t use because to me they are not nesessary but I still drive the car.
    • I haven't gone through all the reading of what it might be or not. The first thing I would do if nothing obvious stands out is replace the mainspring, you have to start at the source of the power. Nine times out of ten that is the problem.  
×
×
  • Create New...