Jump to content
  • 0
snegron

Seiko skx007 regulating question

Question

My Seiko skx007J was running a bit slow when new (around -10 seconds per day), so I regulated it, got it to +1 second per day.

 

Several weeks later it started running slower to -10 seconds per day. I rarely use this watch. I wind it every night (gently shaking it 300 times) and place it face up on a flat surface.

 

So, I regulated it again (using my timegraph) to +3 seconds per day. Ran well for about a week, but then started running slow again. It now runs -20 seconds per day; not magnetized,  no impact (same as always, I don't use it, I wind it every night and set it face up on a dresser).

 

Any suggestions (other than scrapping the movement and replacing it with another)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

How long ago did you buy it? If a few years it could be it just needs a clean. It might even be the hair spring has got a hair or speck of dirt fouling it up. Its a bit drastic to think of scrapping it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Just now, oldhippy said:

How long ago did you buy it? If a few years it could be it just needs a clean. It might even be the hair spring has got a hair or speck of dirt fouling it up. Its a bit drastic to think of scrapping it. 

I bought it new around a year and a half ago. I'll check for dirt, hair, etc. However, as far as I know,  I was the first/only person to have opened it since it was new. 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

There is always enough residual dirt around the rim of the back plate, no short supply of dirt, So prior to removal of the back one should brush the rim, repeat half way openned and use bulb air blower to blow the dirt off.

As for now, you should try to blow the movement clean, easy on HS and strong elsewhere . Best to take the movement out since dirt can get blown to the other side and on dial plate, also wash the case and demagnetize the movement when it is out of the case.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
2 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

There is always enough residual dirt around the rim of the back plate, no short supply of dirt, So prior to removal of the back one should brush the rim, repeat half way openned and use bulb air blower to blow the dirt off.

As for now, you should try to blow the movement clean, easy on HS and strong elsewhere . Best to take the movement out since dirt can get blown to the other side and on dial plate, also wash the case and demagnetize the movement when it is out of the case.

 

 

Thanks! I have a rubber blower I use to clean sensors on my dslr cameras. Hopefully it will do the trick.

 

Worst case scenario, what else should I check in case cleaning/demagnetizing doesn't fix the issue?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

If your watch is only 18 months old, it should be a bit more stable than you've described. Which movement do you have? Most have the 7S26 but some watches made for the JDM will actually have the 7S36. If you have the 7S26 movement, check the rotor to insure that you have the "C" release. It has a better balance staff and regulating mechanism than the "A" version. If by some stroke of really bad luck you have the "B" version then contact your place of purchase as I believe SII will replace your movement at no cost to you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
11 minutes ago, TexasDon said:

If your watch is only 18 months old, it should be a bit more stable than you've described. Which movement do you have? Most have the 7S26 but some watches made for the JDM will actually have the 7S36. If you have the 7S26 movement, check the rotor to insure that you have the "C" release. It has a better balance staff and regulating mechanism than the "A" version. If by some stroke of really bad luck you have the "B" version then contact your place of purchase as I believe SII will replace your movement at no cost to you. 

 

11 minutes ago, TexasDon said:

If your watch is only 18 months old, it should be a bit more stable than you've described. Which movement do you have? Most have the 7S26 but some watches made for the JDM will actually have the 7S36. If you have the 7S26 movement, check the rotor to insure that you have the "C" release. It has a better balance staff and regulating mechanism than the "A" version. If by some stroke of really bad luck you have the "B" version then contact your place of purchase as I believe SII will replace your movement at no cost to you. 

Definitely the 7S26 version, not sure about the "C" release though. What does the "B" version look like?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

The "A" version has the older balance staff and regulator. The "B" version was to update the movement to the new version but it was a disaster due to a factory defect which allowed the HS to become wedged beneath a pin on the regulating post. The "C" version, which is the latest, was released to correct this problem. The version number is stamped on the counterweight along with the caliber information. 

You will need to remove the back to see this view. 

seiko-caliber-7s26c.jpg

Edited by TexasDon
clarity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
18 minutes ago, TexasDon said:

The "A" version has the older balance staff and regulator. The "B" version was to update the movement to the new version but it was a disaster due to a factory defect which allowed the HS to become wedged beneath a pin on the regulating post. The "C" version, which is the latest, was released to correct this problem. The version number is stamped on the counterweight along with the caliber information. 

You will need to remove the back to see this view. 

seiko-caliber-7s26c.jpg

Thanks!! I'll open it up and check it tomorrow.  If it is the "B" version, would it be a matter of simply changing out the balance, or would it require a new HS as well?

Edited by snegron
Spelling...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

It would require a complete new balance assembly and regulator. It's my understanding that Seiko will do this for you. If your SKX007J isn't a counterfeit, then there's little chance of you having the "B" version as almost all of that production was from SII's Singapore manufacturing facility. Yours will likely say made in the Philippines, possibly Malaysia. Japan regards both as part of the JDM. One of the reasons why J versions of the SKX007 began commanding a higher price was the point of manufacture for the movement. I've seen a few J versions with a 7S36 movement also. More than likely it was as a result of higher demand than could be supplied with 7S26 movements for a short while. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I haven't had the chance to open it up (waiting on rubber gasket for the case back I ordered), but for some miraculous reason it returned to -2.7 seconds per day! I'm guessing there must have been some tiny particle obstructing the HS as many of you suggested. As soon as the gaskets and grease I ordered arrive I will open it up and give it a thorough cleaning.

 

Thanks again everyone!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Hi,

I stumbled across this post on the Seiko 7s26. I bought 2 watches new, the diver watch SKX version and 2 months later the dress watch case version with this movement. Both are incredibly disappointing. Terrible experience with this movement. Both exhibited double digit running fast or slow in different orientations. I got so frustrated trying to regulate these watches when I was first starting out in this hobby. In fact I thought I was doing something wrong and bought a time grapher to "do it right". The machine just reinforced how bad these movements are. I am glad I got the machine. My very next purchase was a 9015 movement and then 2824-2.....wow drastic difference,  both regulated beautifully. I can't help but walk away with a notion that Seiko has somehow lost its way. Two different retailers, two different watch cases....same 7s26 movement. Both sitting in a drawer with no interest to revisit. Am alone in my experience?

-Nick

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Hi Nick,

 

You are not alone. I have owned 3 watches with this movement and had the same negative experience.  Seriously considering tossing the movement of my SKX007J and replacing it with a quartz movement. My SKX007J has the stainless steel endmill band. Looks awesome but is the most unreliable watch I have ever owned. No idea why there are so many SKX007 fans out there. 

Ironically,  I also own a Seiko Prospex solar powered diver and it too is unreliable; it runs fast by +20 seconds per month on average! Same with my other solar powered Seikos. Only accurate Seiko I own is an old quartz chrono; runs only +2 seconds fast per month. 

I still haven't had the time to re-open my SKX007J and search for any tiny debris.  Will probably get to it this weekend.  Won't be getting my hopes up too high as this watch has been nothing but a disappointment since new.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
On 1/30/2019 at 12:02 AM, snegron said:

Thanks! I have a rubber blower I use to clean sensors on my dslr cameras. Hopefully it will do the trick.

 

Worst case scenario, what else should I check in case cleaning/demagnetizing doesn't fix the issue?

Sorry for late response, I just noticed your post.  Perhaps best bet would be to lower expectaions, if you feel comfortable with balance-cock removal, cleaning and demagnetizeing the balance outside the watch and right oiling may do some good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Unfortunately, this is why some Seiko movements have fallen into disfavor. In fact, pricing is reflecting point of origin more and more on the 7S26. Those movements made in Malaysia or Singapore tend to fetch lower prices than the ones still made in Japan. I can throw a little accelerant on this fire by adding that I've never had a bad movement from Japan. On the other hand I've had one sourced from Malaysia that wasn't worth the space it occupied.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
On 1/29/2019 at 8:27 PM, TexasDon said:

The "A" version has the older balance staff and regulator. The "B" version was to update the movement to the new version but it was a disaster due to a factory defect which allowed the HS to become wedged beneath a pin on the regulating post. The "C" version, which is the latest, was released to correct this problem. The version number is stamped on the counterweight along with the caliber information. 

You will need to remove the back to see this view. 

seiko-caliber-7s26c.jpg

I finally got around to opening it up. It is the "C" version. I cleaned it up with a blower (didn't see any hair or particles), regulated it again,  checked it on my timegrapher. It seems to continue to be slowing down, but not by as much as before.

 

 

20190407_155447.jpg

20190407_152956.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
1 hour ago, snegron said:

I cleaned it up with a blower (didn't see any hair or particles), regulated it again,  checked it on my timegrapher.

It should not make a big difference in term of accuracy, but try to to adjust beat error as well. It's the arm where the end of the hairsping is pinned, just like the rate regulator it needs minuscule movement. 

Other than that, I can only note that the number of people complaining about Seiko (accuracy or anything else) is a small percentage compared to who's happy about it, which matches my own experience after handling some hundreds.

Comparing to ETA 2824 makes no sense, the 7S26 is $30  bought in quantity (actually Seiko / SII doesn't even sell it anymore after the introduction of the 4R36 / NH36), while a 2824 is like 6 times as much, or more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
22 minutes ago, meanoldmanning said:

That amplitude is pretty low. Should be nearer the 270 range minimum on a fairly new 7s. Right there suggests something ain’t right.

Actually amplitude varies a lot even among relatively new Seikos, like the OP one. 214 deg is not stellar but still acceptable, one should check with a full winding at the barrel screw. 270 deg. is really rarely seen even on brand new ones, but what you will certain find on these is an average of 0.5ms beat error, and 10-15 sec/day fast rate,
And good luck finding that something which "isn't right" to cause low amplitude, believe me .. I've tried.

Edited by jdm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Actually amplitude varies a lot even among relatively new Seikos, like the OP one. 214 deg is not stellar but still acceptable, one should check with a full winding at the barrel screw. 270 deg. is really rarely seen even on brand new ones, but what you will certain find on these is an average of 0.5ms beat error, and 10-15 sec/day fast rate,

And good luck finding that something which "isn't right" to cause low amplitude, believe me .. I've tried.

 

214 isn’t acceptable in my book. I don’t have many of them but none of the half dozen or so I’ve had have such low amplitude, at least not when anywhere near full wind. All of the NH3x and 7s26/36 I’ve had run at minimum at 270 +- a few degrees. Even the old 700x series mov’ts I’ve worked on wind up closer to the 270 range than not.

 

And yes the OP needs to wind at the barrel screw, not by swinging the watch x number of times.

 

Some old photos I had on hand. First is a 7s36 after being worn all day. The second is an NH36 after being worn all day. Both were in new unopened watches

 

6c858bda2746478f97211507c5f639d0.jpg

 

56b500a6e59900a94727dbcb930d7951.jpg

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
3 minutes ago, meanoldmanning said:

214 isn’t acceptable in my book. I don’t have many of them but none of the half dozen or so I’ve had have such low amplitude, at least not when anywhere near full wind. All of the NH3x and 7s26/36 I’ve had run at minimum at 270 +- a few degrees. Even the old 700x series mov’ts I’ve worked on wind up closer to the 270 range than not.

Then you're exceptionally lucky with your collection. Here's a random pic from my archives, that is a an Aug. '11 unserviced watch.

Do you work on Seiko movements? If so you could perhaps share some tips to increase amplitude, that is certainly one parameter in which they are inferior to the Swiss. That is, until one realizes that they are sufficiently accurate anyway.

31264674738_78cb338aa5_c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
24 minutes ago, meanoldmanning said:

Some old photos I had on hand. First is a 7s36 after being worn all day. The second is an NH36 after being worn all day. Both were in new unopened watches

What I've found is that the lack of consistency across units of the same age is kind of dismaying. See below thread for an example, of an exceptionally good one, others of the same age weren't doing nearly as good,  and needed service way before the canonical 5 years. 

 

Edited by jdm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Then you're exceptionally lucky with your collection. Here's a random pic from my archives, that is a an Aug. '11 unserviced watch. Do you work on Seiko movements? If so you could perhaps share some tips to increase amplitude, that is certainly one parameter in which they are inferior to the Swiss. That is, until one realizes that they are sufficiently accurate anyway.31264674738_78cb338aa5_c.jpg&key=8059c66a0c72ffab6c9fbfe65b6df4b0f836f7e0cba3c89d5440afa5e89fbf7f

 

 

Yes, it’s pretty much all I work on. 63xx series, 700x series, 7s, some of the smaller mov’ts from ladies watches, 754x quartz, etc.  

The common understanding is Seikos run at lower amp than Swiss but that’s usually misunderstood in my opinion to mean dismally low amp like in the OP’s post. Even the old 63xx mov’ts I service wind up running around 250+ otherwise I start over. Cleanliness, pivots and jewels in good condition, proper oiling. QC from the factory seems to be pretty low for sure, I’ve seen photos of brand new 7s mov’ts that are way over oiled with oil migrating from the pivots in the winding mech. That doesn’t benefit anything

 

Here’s a 6349 I serviced recently (40 years old mov’t).

 

d43f3c3225bccb80dcdd1c652a168d33.jpg&key=b713ca6b53a2e6bde5757cfec0f6cc5130666abca9ad7ba73d0fc84f78ecc6c7

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

After winding it as much as possible, I placed it back on the timegrapher. Amplitude starts higher (268, 270), but then drops down to the 250's after a few minutes.  Then it drops down to the 240's . 

20190407_204627.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
9 hours ago, snegron said:

After winding it as much as possible, I placed it back on the timegrapher. Amplitude starts higher (268, 270), but then drops down to the 250's after a few minutes.  Then it drops down to the 240's 

Thats absolutely normal. It has a good pattern and is well regulated. Next would be checking crown and 12 down, expect easily 20 secs slow deviation. The final test is wearing and finding the resting position which best compensensate the daily error. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This advert also caught my eye, for a couple of reasons. Firstly, as it refers to 4 models of National Watch Cleaning Machine. I have now got photos of all four types and the similarities to any other machine I have seen (Elma etc.) are striking. Again leading me to muse over which came first. The second point is in the detail. In the listing for the Model 2 and 3, they refer to both watch and clock baskets being supplied. This makes me wonder about previous posts on these forums, where others have said that their National Machines, had 80mm baskets, whilst the one I have, comes with a 65mm basket. I just wonder if the 80mm basket is therefore a clock basket and larger to accommodate the larger parts? It would seem to make sense, as whichever size of basket is used, the width of the jars supplied has to be suitable ( I.e. large enough), to accommodate the larger and smaller baskets. Certainly the jars on mine would easily be large enough to allow use of an 80mm basket. Also, contemporary watch cleaning machines (Elma Super Elite, etc.) also seem to use 65mm  cleaning baskets, but their glass jars are all very much smaller than the early Nationals, and would likely not accommodate an 80mm basket size. I just wonder if the industry as a whole, just started concentrating on automated watch cleaning, and just let the clock works cleaning side of things lapse. Makes you think...
    • I have been doing a little research into these fine old machines and found some useful background. The National brand was used by the company S.Lanzetter of Manchester. That much can be found out easily by simply reading the information on the makers’s plate. It seems that S.Lanzetter was one of the key members of the Jewish watch making and jewellers community in Manchester from around the turn of the 19th century. At the time, they were a very well known watchmaker’s materials and machinery supplier, and also responsible in their own right for patenting some key items. Such as this particular style of watch cleaning machine ( and other variants) from around 1945, electric soldering machines, and watch crystal cutting/grinding machines. i managed to find a reference to a National Watch Cleaning machine that is retained in the UK’s History of Science Museum. I have included their extract for the item below. It describes the typical layout and functionality of this type of machine perfectly and mentions a spare rheostat, that seems to have been supplied with the exhibit. I would be interested to know which company copied what, as the original Elma machines were pretty much identical, and it gets me thinking if the National, as well as later National designs, pre-dated them all? Who knows... What I have further identified were other versions of what the manufacturer refers to as their “Model 1”. I have seen what appears to be later versions of model one that have an additional switch, which I presume isolates the rheostat and thus provides a proper off switch, rather than just relying on the rheostat being set to minimum (as mine is). A further version of the model 1 additionally has a small indicator lamp on the rheostat housing, indicating if the heater is switched on. Again, mine does not have that. This leads me to assume that my model 1 is one of the early versions, which perhaps dates it to between 1945 to 1950. As this makes my machine likely to be around 60 to 70 years old - I feel like I am restoring something quite special, even though it is quite an ordinary machine. I have also found an old advert for the National brand(as applied at the time) which may be an example of the advertising copy, as referred to in the science museum entry. This is really “of its time” and a delightful reminder of the whimsical advertising style, typical of the 1940’s and 50’s.
    • Read these comments below on another forum that I found - as a newby, very interesting.  With no disrespected intended, I would compare a watch repair hobbyist to a car mechanic hobbyist. If one wants to tinker around a car engine, why not. But when it comes to working on an engine timing or other aspects that are more involved, like any other profession, going to specialized school of the trade is paramount.  Since a watch is a small object, one tends to translate at start “small-size” with “simplicity”. I think the following in a great read and will personally push me in near future to go toward the traditional learning route of watchmaking, even if I do not see It at this point as a profession - but who know what the future will bring. This also relates to my wanting to start with “good” tools, in order to experience and appreciate more the watchmaking trade from the start. Upgrading several times usually becomes more expensive anyway and I rather take the time to acquire the proper tools. It is a hobby for me after all as it stands and as much as I look forward to getting my “hands dirty” I already have a profession and other problem solving hobbies that I can wrap my mind around... One of them being being golf   Just have a technical problem solving mind, I look forward to see if my hands can follow   =============== “Post 1: If you are just looking to have fun, then do as woodwkr2 suggests, and get some books, watch some videos, etc. and have at it. I would however suggest though that you go in with realistic goals. I personally don't have any problems with hobbyists (some professional watchmakers do), and if you have followed any of my posts here I try to help where I can for those here who dabble in repairs. Some help is posted, and a lot is not since it's done via PM or email. I only say this because I don't want you or anyone to think I'm trying to discourage you, or be negative... The problem with people wanting to get into watch repairs, and eventually "service my own watches" as I see as the often stated goal, is that really you have no idea what is involved to do the job properly. Most people simply don't know how much they don't know about this subject. It's not anyone's fault, it's just how it is. One thing that's hard to get across is that even on a very simple watch, they require quite advanced (for a hobbyist) work on them. It doesn't have to be a co-axial, chronograph, or anything else complicated to easily be way over the head of a hobbyist. A simple manual winding movement can require a lot done to it - things I do often, if not every single day on every single watch. On the most basic level, it's rare that I am not adjusting end shakes, manipulating the balance spring, or dynamic poising some watch during my day. For example I'm working on a Speedmaster today along with others, and when all the chronographparts are stripped off, it's a very simple manual winding base movement. What I did to it today has nothing to do with it being a chronograph. I had to adjust the barrel arbor end shake (it was huge), adjust the end shake of the escape wheel (alsohuge), adjust the balance spring for flatness, concentricity, and centering between the regulating pins. Routine stuff for me to get the watch running properly, but the balance spring work in particular is something most hobbyists are not going to tackle. Even proper oiling of the pivots, and epilame treatment and oiling the escapement are going to be a major challenge for most hobbyists. One problem is that even after a watch is serviced,many hobbyists will be happy if it runs and keeps decent time, but this doesn't mean it's been serviced properly. Getting a watch ticking is not doing a proper service as it would be done by aprofessional (at least a decent one). So even just disassembling, cleaning, properly oiling, and adjusting a watch to a high standard will be beyondmany, and we haven't started talking about repairs yet. Even if you start with a watch running well, there is a good chance you may break something during the service. If it's something cheap then you can just a get a new part, but if it's something more expensive (or even worse rare) then you may be in trouble quickly. Something as routine as replacing a balance staff would be pretty advanced work for most hobbyists, and it requires a fair bit of equipment to do...lathe, staking set, roller remover, balance spring levers, truing calipers, poising tool... As I said, not trying to discourage you or anyone (the more you learn the more you will appreciate what professional watchmakers do) but just encourage you to be realistic. Most watch schools are 2 years in duration, and then the education really starts when you get hired and start servicing watches day in and day out... Anyway, good luck and if you have questions, ask. Cheers, Al Post 2:   Balance spring work is best learned with someone there to guide you. The gold standard is having an instructor there who is experienced and can show you. Someone for whom "good enough" is not "good enough." Someone who will push you, and push you, and push you to get it perfect....over and over and over again. Very few people can do this on their own the way it's learned in a watchmaking school. Reading in a book about how to place a bend to have a specific result is quite different than actually doing it. Almost more import than that is actually knowing what result you really need to have on a spring, so what bend do I need to make to fix a specific problem. In other words, the basic rules for making a bend are simple, but knowing what bend you need isn't always simple or apparent. Also, part of this is training your eyes. Your eyes (and what's behind them) are valuable tools in watch repair. If you can't see the problem, you don't know it's there, so you can't fix it. For example what the average hobbyist sees as a balance spring that is perfectly concentric, will probably look out to me. It's just accumulated experience and being able to see very fine detail. For whatever reason, when you start out at this (we all start from the same place - no one is born with these skills), your eyes just can't see small imperfections. Only through doing this thousands and thousands of times do you get to know almost without looking hard that something is out. Concentricity, in particular on a flat balance spring, is the easy part. On an overcoil balance spring it can present different problems though, and a different approach to correcting errors is needed. Now correcting errors in concentricity, without creating errors in the flat, is something you need to be able to do. But even if you don't create errors in the flat, they still show up, and need to be corrected. This tends to be the more difficult thing to correct for most people. But if you know what to look for, I can often look at a spring that is dished, make one bend, and it's perfectly flat. And you need to be able to do this across a wide variety of sizes, strengths, and types of balance springs. As has been pointed out., do you really "want" to learn this? This part of watchmaking is not fun, really. It's necessary, but certainly not fun, in particular when you get a really messed up spring in a watch... Just something to consider. Cheers, Al”   AJ
    • I hand clean and only use the lighter fluid for one-dip, what is the cheaper refined alternative you're referring to? I'm focusing on buying proper oils before getting fancy with my cleaning setup, so I'm hand cleaning for now with mineral spirits in a scrub then rinse.
    • That is good news. I have never heard of that trick. 
×
×
  • Create New...