Jump to content

Can you use a movement with a date ring at 3 o'clock on a 6 o'clock ?


Recommended Posts

Hello all.

I have been preoccupied with family matters (both parents have passed away in the last 19 months). 

I now have more time to repair timepieces.

I need to replace an ETA 956.114-2H-D6  but these seem to be rather difficult to find in a new format.

The suppliers have the 956.112 with date at 6 that is compatible, but I would like to stick with the .114 if possible.

I have found a few with the date at 3.

Does that make any difference ?

Is the mechanism designed in such a way that the date change has to be at 6 for a movement with a date at 6 ?

This is the 114 with date at 3

 1444205620_eta-956114-2h-swiss-parts-movement(1).thumb.jpg.742b2b0d4115957f9d92e4706c5c8ab8.jpgeta-956114-2h-swiss-parts-movement.thumb.jpg.f461b733a8e072235df453c6e57b40ef.jpg

 

This is the 112 with date at 6

  956.112_2_6_with_overall_height__44190.1477087516.thumb.gif.1e559cdcfb494b6cf8212b450ff43a30.gif

eta956112-6-f.thumb.jpg.0f2fdd2d659b5c273f204630c7c8e255.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a guide I made.

Firstly it looks like your old movement is 2 Hands, secondly your date disc looks damaged so I would reuse it.

Secondly I would strongly recommend replacing it with a 956.112 rather than a 956.114.  956.112 is 95% the same, completely interchangeable, it is simply the updated version and therefore a better movement.

If you had a power extension lead from 1990, you wouldn't replace it with a new old stock extension lead also from 1990.  The movement will be old and the oil likely to be gummed up.  The new version will be fresh and manufactured within the last year or two.  956.114 will be second hand and/or have been sitting in stock for 15-25+ years.

Finally your movement is likely to be standard height unless the dial looks unusually thick so not need to worry about this.

 

mvt.thumb.jpeg.0f8e3964bc804aae7132996a9f004e0a.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/7/2019 at 8:49 AM, GleaveandCoLuke said:

Here is a guide I made.

Firstly it looks like your old movement is 2 Hands, secondly your date disc looks damaged so I would reuse it.

Secondly I would strongly recommend replacing it with a 956.112 rather than a 956.114.  956.112 is 95% the same, completely interchangeable, it is simply the updated version and therefore a better movement.

If you had a power extension lead from 1990, you wouldn't replace it with a new old stock extension lead also from 1990.  The movement will be old and the oil likely to be gummed up.  The new version will be fresh and manufactured within the last year or two.  956.114 will be second hand and/or have been sitting in stock for 15-25+ years.

Finally your movement is likely to be standard height unless the dial looks unusually thick so not need to worry about this.

 

mvt.thumb.jpeg.0f8e3964bc804aae7132996a9f004e0a.jpeg

what book is this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Two pins or screwdrivers angled out slightly, pressing through from the barrel centre from the opposite side so they contact just clear of the hole in the lid? eg. Strap pin driver needles or similar.
    • That's a good idea - shrinking down the nut and wrench size from the old casebook trick!
    • I missed this earlier. The dial isn't going into the holder, it should sit proud of it. This is what I am currently using which I print for each different movement.    
    • I didn't think pulling to set position would work harden the spring, in that position it is stressed where the arm starts. By work hardening i meant rapid polishing at that point, a bit like polishing a pivot work hardens as it compresses the steel. I doubt polishing by hand would achieve much in that respect though. Its finished, arm polished up mostly at the join to the bridge's main body. I'm ok with it, the screw holes aren't great as i had to open them up by redrilling and positioning it was difficult, I'm not much use with a loupe, opening up with a file might be a better option for me or i could just use the correct drill size 😅. And the detent is way too deep, i had to guess that with the stem release out of position and sat on top, but i only took one measure and went for it, no slowly slowly catch your monkey 😅. First go I'm happy , well sort of, it works and thats a big thing for me, next one will have a bit more finesse.  Anyone thats interested, after filing, i used a 2000 grade home made diamond  micro file and then 20 micron film, the film is much better than wet and dry, more stable to use and doesn't shed cheap grade grit everywhere , then auto polish on a sponge pad.
    • I'm assuming that every time you set the watch you are work hardening the detent spring, maximum hardening is  where it meets the plate due to maximum deflection.   That's why it snaps there.  The Young's modulus may be the same but after it's reached its maximum yeid strength it breaks.  My mechanic engineering is very rusty, correct me if I'm wrong. 
×
×
  • Create New...