Jump to content

High end watches by "Grand Seiko"


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

I got a springdrive whcih I no longer wear and have kept in bank safe deposit box in past seven years.I wonder if the rechargable capacitor or battery in it would corrode as regulare batteries do. 

The back is SS and has not yet been opened. Power reserve indicator show no power loss during several months of rest with motor off.

Should I take the battery out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

I got a springdrive whcih I no longer wear and have kept in bank safe deposit box in past seven years.I wonder if the rechargable capacitor or battery in it would corrode as regulare batteries do. 

The back is SS and has not yet been opened. Power reserve indicator show no power loss during several months of rest with motor off.

Should I take the battery out?

I believe it is probably a supercapacitor, (or in more modern variants a very particular type of rechargeable lithium cell, which they call an "energy storage device", since they claim the watches to be sans battery ).

These do not tend to leak as the chemistry involved is entirely different from primary cells, of the type found in most quartz watches . I would tend to leave well alone, particularly since the removal would require major surgery, as the "energy storage device" is spot welded to metal contact plates, which are in turn screwed to the circuit board and/or mechanism,  so you need to remove l large percentage of the watch to remove them. 

Remember the old adage, if it 'aint busted, don't fix it.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AndyHull said:

.. actually on reflection, does the spring drive even have a capacitor/battery reserve, is the whole point of it, not that the power is in a spring... other more knowledgeable will no doubt put me right.

Hi andy, Some article on the suject, talks of two hundered high percision parts used in basic springdrive and use of electromagnetism in it .That confused me and looks like I confused you instead and it is cofusing.

I am now thinking if the point of springdrive is not what you said, what is the point of springdrive then? 

I got a chinees cased seiko kinitic for $200, rotor charges a battery which run a quartz movement, while the springdrive retails for 6K. This tells me if springdrive used a battery of the sort, why not buy kinitic. 

I now think one idea of springdrive, is to eleminate the need for battery and its replacement , available pix online show nothing resembling a battery or capacitor. 

The watch feel high quality perhaps comparable to rolex, AP,  a bit heavy though, should you ever consider to get one, I recomment a titanium case.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys. As Pip said, the Grand Seiko high end sub brand has been around a long time - since the 1960s. Throughout that time they've been high end mechanical and some high end quartz watches. The quality is certainly as good as high quality Swiss stuff.
As for the spring drive, it's driven by a mainspring - not a battery and step motor. It does have a quartz element - there is a 'brake' that regulates the movement and this 'brake' is controlled by a circuit (I'm not sure without reading up whether this circuit gets its power direct from the mainspring as it is released or if there is any stored power). Either way, this is very sophisticated technology and in no way comparable to a kinetic watch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AndyHull said:

Its a really smart arrangement, if I didn't think it would end in divorce, I might consider splashing the cash on one. :D

This like most seiko lack elegance, some glory. My passion for a thin manual ulysee nardin or IWC remains. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • in general this shouldn't be any change. but in general questions like this it be nice to know the specifics of the watch in other words how was it performing before it was cased up and what is it doing now.
    • just as a reminder this watch is a Swatch group product. This will bring up a problem like spare parts and technical information. that I found some links to some information on when I talk about your watch and some of the technical and basically your watch is equivalent to 2834-2 for which I'm attaching the technical sheets. But equivalent does not mean exactly the same you want to do a search on the group for C07 as we discussed this watch before including the technical differences how it's supposed to be regulated and basically because it's watch group there is no parts availability. https://calibercorner.com/eta-caliber-c07-xxx/   https://www.chrono24.com/magazine/eta-movements-from-the-2824-2-to-the-powermatic-80-p_80840/ https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/h-10-movement-details.4636991/ eta CT_2834-2_FDE_481857_15.pdf
    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
×
×
  • Create New...