Jump to content

When I see a clock like this and the word RESTORED


oldhippy

Recommended Posts

When I see a clock like this and the word RESTORED is present in its selling advertisement I always like to look. 9 times out 10 I’m disappointed. They are never properly restored. The people who undertake the work charge very high prices and you end up with something like this.

Screws unattended. All should have the burr removed from their heads and highly polished

Platform screws. If signs of bluing. All should have the burr removed from their heads and highly polished and re-blued.

Back plate pins should be the same size, where cut should be nicely rounded off.

All pins should be cut and nicely rounded off. They should be steel not brass. They should be straight not bent.

Parts missing should be made and replaced. This clock is missing the stop work.

Barrel arbors should be tidied up and the flat sides polished.

Hand setting part should be tidied up and the flat sides polished.

The centre wheel end should be polished. The same goes for the hand collet  

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Beautiful-antique-French-striking-carriage-clock-c-1860-5-restored-10-18/113478774506?hash=item1a6bdcaeea:g:Ba8AAOSwQ5pcHnCS

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't agree more. Rounded screw heads and/or damaged slots are a pet peeve of mine. I simply won't abide them at all. Either repair them properly or replace them outright. I once totally dismantled a Winchester '97 12 gauge solely for that reason. The screws were atrocious when I acquired it. Not when I sold it several years later. This should be basic instinct to any craftsman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Lovely clock, but I see what you mean, some of the taper pins have just been cut to size with end cutters and left with sharp end.

One of the first tools I made was was a set of chamfering tools with one to take the sharp edge of taper pins.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is another bad example

A few on here have heard me say about invisible re-bushing. This should be achieved on clock movements that are visible to the eye such as Carriage Clocks and Four Glass Clocks. I always made my own bush using my lathe, it is not hard, in fact it is easy using brass rod. You can make it the correct width. You counter sink the bush so it will not show in the plate but must fit the majority of the pivot.  You counter sink the bush after it has be inserted.

Here are two bad examples that I have found on ebay. The first photo shows two, one two shallow for the pivot and the other too wide for the plate. The other shows the bush fitted but viable and not counter sunk correctly  

s-l1600.jpg

s-l1600 (1).jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of bushing problems that are seen on clocks are from using Bergeon or any other pre made bushes these have far too much of a pronounced bevel on the front of the bush so once put into place they always form a ring around the bush which can been seen on the second example, Bergeon bushes are described as hard bushes which they are not the quality of old brass seems superior to modern brass and french clock plates are extremely hard and can be quite difficult to broach at times.

The worst sin of all would be screw in bushes

One only has to look at modern carriage clocks to see why a good antique carriage clock is preferable to any so called good quality  carriage clock made today, such as Mathew Norman or L'epee which always use ugly obvious bronze bushes such as the example below:

https://en.expertissim.com/l-epee-music-tourbillon-carriage-clock-1839-1989-12208150

 

Edited by wls1971
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The are of repairing or restoring anything, and I would argue this applies to pretty much anything that can be repaired, from priceless antiques to the most humble piece, is making it look like it was never broken in the first place.

This takes skill and patience, both of which are in short supply in the modern world.  It makes your heart sink, when you see something botched and covered in "apprentice marks", or lashed together so that it "kinda works".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...