Jump to content

Sweep second problem.


rogart63

Recommended Posts

Have an old movement with sweep second attachment. An extra third  wheel and an pinion. The problem is that the pinion is wrong. Either it's to many teeth or wrong cut of the teeth. When i put the extra third wheel on the movement it stops. Going to see if i can fix it anyway. But my question is if a wheel or a pinion has more or less teeth in this construction. Would the watch run okay anyway, Only the second hand would go faster. As the extra third wheel on top of the movement turns the second hand pinion. 

Edited by rogart63
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's an extra wheel providing the drive for the seconds then this is known as 'indirect centre seconds' - example diagram below.

If you have the wrong pinion i.e. the green shaded pinion one in the diagram then, yes, this should only effect the seconds hand in some way.

DiagramIndirectCenterSeconds.jpg

Have you found a picture of your movement type on the web to compare the pinion?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

movement type ? If the movement runs without the center second, the problem lies there. If the teeth are correctly sized the gear would be over or under sized depending on the number of teeth. if the gear is of proper diameter and tooth count correct  i think improper shape could cause a jam. inspect the teeth closely under magnification.If you can somehow get a picture of the movement online , do a tooth count.tooth much tension on retainer spring could also cause a problem

Edited by yankeedog
content
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the principle at play here is gear reduction. if the second hand turns once per minute  and the hour hand turns once per hour you have a 60:1 ratio. if the minute hand turns once per hour and the hour hand once in twelve , that is a 1:12 ratio. the only way to know for sure is to count the teeth and do the math.rule one problem out the move on to the next variable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, yankeedog said:

the principle at play here is gear reduction. if the second hand turns once per minute  and the hour hand turns once per hour you have a 60:1 ratio. if the minute hand turns once per hour and the hour hand once in twelve , that is a 1:12 ratio. the only way to know for sure is to count the teeth and do the math.rule one problem out the move on to the next variable.

Was just me wonder how it worked. But got the answer i wanted from Watchmaker. The movement is a Doxa 14 with sweep second. I misplaced the sweep second in the wash. Found a pinion on a Eterna 600 that fitted. But think it had more teeth or had a different cut on the teeth. But think i have found the right pinion now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from .
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
    • @JohnR725 now that you've mentioned it. This is actually the second aftermarket spring (same place and brand) I ordered as the first one broke. The eye on which the arbor pulls on, broke off on the first spring after the first wind, and also it was a bit to large for the arbor. Looked like on one the second picture in the 2nd group. The second one was exactly the same, I had to bend it a bit, to give it a more prominent curve to the end of the spring so that the arbor catches the eye.  Also I believe both were 5-10mm shorter. Not that I writing that, I feel a bit dumb, as the spring might actually been the problem all along, although its advertised as a substitute to the original...     
    • The CS70 is the only one they show as annealed.  A further search on ebay, I found CS75 and CS100 annealed carbon steel strips  e.g. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314072784422
×
×
  • Create New...