Jump to content

Movement id help again...


Recommended Posts

Working on an old movement just to (after cleaning) find that one of the escapement wheel pivots is gone.

 

Another issue is that someone have, as it appears, replaced the pallet fork cock and in the process ground down the ”new” one to make the height fit. But...the jewel hole does not match the lower one in the base plate 100%, making the pallet fork sit a bit tilted. Wonder if that ever worked...?

 

Talking mod’s I note that escapement wheels for this type of basic design are pretty similar. If I find one that is just slightly too long or short, would it be feasable to shift the jewels slightly in or out to make it work. I realize it’s not going to be easy to get a decent end shake....

 

In any case, if there’s someone who can id the movement, I would appreciate it. Not likely there are spares around, but who knows.

 

I assembled the important items to hopefully make the id easier.

 

7ec1971fa6450239f93e96a539f46cd9.jpg7857e8c54aaa4b001f382253c213f9bd.jpg927b0e636a0128b1b759e9bac0f777ea.jpg

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for the feedback.

But I can't get that id to work out with the other features of the watch as it's coming from a tank style watch that seems to be from the 30's. 

And there's no shock protection either, which I would have guessed would be there in a 60's design 

My assumption is a much older movement...

What do you say...?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it might be from that era too ,seen a lot of different examples during the years. I saw there were a datasheet in the resource page here so maybe the left version called Cal.1149 could fit as your movement?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

attached is a close-up photo of the key-less works.

I flipped through most of the 10,5"' size movements on Ranfft but couldn't find anything that was close. 

The yoke seems unusually short and straight compared to most designs I see on Ranfft. 

Where does other people find designs and pictures to compare against?

 

IMG_E0742[1].JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, wls1971 said:

This is a Derby calibre 33 movement.

Spot on ! 

The Derby 40 on Ranfft is close on the key-less stuff but looks more modern otherwise.

But 17-jewels (https://17jewels.info/movements/d/derby/derby-33/ ) shows one that's identical except for the the shock proof add-on that my movement doesn't have. 

Derby can't have been a large manufacturer as there's not much info to be found (so far at least) .

And the name is strangely English sounding for a Swiss origin or what do you say?

And there seems to be spares around..:)

Many thanks, deeply appreciated!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice one @wls1971! I'd gone through all the 'usual' suspects but, like @bsoderling hadn't come across the Derby. Not one I've heard of before either! A nice looking movement though ... I like the curved symmetry of those bridges.

Derby does seem to be a Swiss manufacturer. Some makers deliberately gave themselves a more English sounding name to make them more 'accessible' to large markets like the US. According to this page ... https://www.watch-wiki.net/index.php?title=ASUAG ... Derby became part of Ebauches SA in 1941.

Good luck with getting this one going @bsoderling. If you do let us know how it turns out as I'd be interested to see the finished item with dial. Now back to the oh-so-common ETA movement I'm working on ... !

Edited by WatchMaker
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Modular Movement Holder.pdf  
    • Hi Frank, you have dived headlong into the deep end. Hairspring work has to be the scariest thing a newbie has to tackle. Your hairspring appears to be bent and just putting it back into the regulator would not allow the balance to work properly. It might start oscillating but the performance would not be good. The proper thing to do is to unstud the hairspring, remove the hairspring from the balance, reinstall the hairspring on the stud carrier, reshape the endcurve and centre the collet to the balance jewel hole. This challenge would either make you or break you. Hope that you will be able to fix your watch. Welcome to the world of watchmaking.  Watch this video. It think it'll give you an idea of the task ahead. From your 1st photo, I think you have a etachron type stud. Let me see if I can find a video on how to remove it from the arm.
    • Have read of the Tech Sheet attached on the balance section page 12. It may be bent but until you reposition it back in the regulator pins you'll never know. Cheers CJ 4R35B_4R36A.pdf
    • Aloha All, My Seiko 4R35B movement stopped working today. Upon closer inspection, it looks like the balance spring came out of the regulator pin. This is my first time working on a balance. Any advice on how to get this spring repositioned (back to normal)? I'm pretty sure that while adjusting the beat error on this movement, I must have turned the stud (I didn't even know they turned), and the spring eventually fell out.  Will the spring go back to even spacing when it's back in the pin, or does it look bent? Thanks, Frank  
    • Good job, that band matches the watch perfectly.
×
×
  • Create New...