Jump to content

WHAT IS A CHRONOMETER?


Recommended Posts

 A few weeks ago I began to study Celestial Navigation. At 70 years of age I have no current plans to take off in a boat with a compass, watch and sextant but I had a lifelong curiosity about how navigation  worked  and the  importance  accurate time played in the navigational process.  Most of my working life was spent in manufacturing as a machine designer ( mostly automated machinery) but I also spent nine years (1978-1987) running the CNC department. My interest in watches began, like most people on this forum, as a post career hobby and I plan to keep it that way.  In any case, I was often exposed to the sales hype from the major watch factories  advertising their watch as a "chronometer", at a higher price, as opposed to a general watch which sold at a lower price. The "chronometer" product often had numerous buttons and impressive looking dials that rival pin ball machines, but, as I found out, that was nothing but sales fluff and had nothing to do with the timing device being a chronometer. What actually makes a chronometer  different from other timing devices is  consistency. This does not necessarily mean that it reads the correct time.. A true chronometer  will gain or lose time at a consistent rate and not necessarily tell the "correct" time. If it is to be used for celestial navigation it will come with a  certification certificate showing the  (consistent) rate of gain or loss (fast or slow) over a given time period;  which is typically one month.  This is called  watch error (WE) and must be taken into consideration when calculating a position fix. For example, if the chronometer is four seconds fast per month, one second of time needs to be subtracted from the indicated time for the first week, two seconds subtracted on the second week and so on until the end of the voyage.   A chronometer must never be reset during a voyage due to the possibility of disrupting the timekeeping process.  The precise time is obtained by adding or subtracting the WE (watch error) to the time indicated on the clock or watch dial. Every second of time represents a difference in position of four miles  so losing or gaining a few seconds of time due to  resetting the  clock could be disastrous. According to what I have learned so far,  almost any quartz watch can provide the consistent rate of gain or loss making it suitable to use in celestial navigation.  For mechanical timekeeping devices this is not the case. The mechanical chronometers that were used for celestial navigation in the past were extremely expensive  and still are even if purchased used. Some of them are for sale on Ebay and cost several thousand dollars. That said  quartz controlled electronic devices offer more accuracy at a lower cost and to the best of my knowledge, mechanical chronometers are no longer made.

david

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a section from the "Official Swiss  Chronometer Site".

 Some German, Japanese, and even non-certified Swiss movements can surpass the normative requirements. The Japanese have largely abandoned the accolade, replacing it with in-house testing to a slightly more strict standard as with, for example, the Grand Seiko. On the other hand, the Germans have set up their own testing facility in Saxony at the Glashütte Observatory [2][3] where the DIN 8319 standards, which mirror the ISO standards used by COSC, are employed. At one time the French provided similar large scale testing at the Observatory at Besançon, however, today only a very few watches are currently tested there and carry the accolade "Observatory Chronometer."

david

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...