Jump to content

Buren movement designed for other functions?


DJW

Recommended Posts

I was tearing down this Buren movement and noticed that there is a pinion for a separate gear. It is driven off of the hour wheel. The hour wheel does has a separate gear set underneath that drives whatever would be in this position. Would this be some sort of a date function? Movent is engraved ST 171 ... I could not find any information on this with any relation to Buren watch movements.

IMG_20170620_190418017.jpg

IMG_20170620_195840687.jpg

IMG_20170620_192903154.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I wasn't clear enough about where it's located on the main plate dial side... It's the large circular recess with the pinion in the middle. Just off the hour wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After a little more research it appears that these movements were actually supplied by Seiko Corporation. I have found some very similar Seiko movements with the same dial side layout. And it does appear that there was some advancing wheel there for a date function that was not installed on this movement. I believe from the research I read that Seiko started a company called UT and supplied movements unmarked or E Bosh's to companies. I believe this is one of those movements. It also only Beats at 18000 BPH... Ones that are stamped Seiko all seem to beat at 21600 bph...

Makes sense now that the case was stamped Hong Kong. So now truly an international watch! a watch company that was based in Switzerland with a Japanese movement and a Hong Kong Chinese case:huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

After a little more research it appears that these movements were actually supplied by Seiko Corporation. I have found some very similar Seiko movements with the same dial side layout. And it does appear that there was some advancing wheel there for a date function that was not installed on this movement. I believe from the research I read that Seiko started a company called UT and supplied movements unmarked or E Bosh's to companies. I believe this is one of those movements. It also only Beats at 18000 BPH... Ones that are stamped Seiko all seem to beat at 21600 bph...

Makes sense now that the case was stamped Hong Kong. So now truly an international watch! a watch company that was based in Switzerland with a Japanese movement and a Hong Kong Chinese case:huh:

Thought i had seen it somewhere before. Its a Seiko 7625 or something like that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also you can see where the calendar advancement wheel is located in the same exact spot of the area in question that I had originally. Mystery solved! Thanks guys!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think this is the closest match..

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&a&2uswk&Seiko_6105A

Also I wasn't sure if anyone other than Seiko had used this automatic winding movement, it has the magic lever type escapement shown in the pictures on this reference page at the bottom...

That ain't a 6105 movement. Not even a 7625 as i thought at first. That has no adjustable beaterror arm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh nice. I have a similar wedge style stump for my staking tool, so I'll give that a shot. Thanks!
    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
×
×
  • Create New...