Jump to content

Cyma / Tavannes one-buton chrono


Recommended Posts

I have just acquired this one - the price reflected the fact that the teeth visible in the accompanying close-up snap are worn and occasionally jump when setting. Otherwise it runs well. I was wondering whether there are any options for fixing this fault. So far I've been unable to identify the movement so sourcing a spare part (s) changes from difficult to impossible. I have some other reservations about it but I'll hold back on them for the moment.

Thanks!

Roy

 

Cyma_chrono-5250007.JPG

Cyma_chrono-5250001.JPG

Cyma_chrono-5250002.JPG

Cyma_chrono-5250003.JPG

Cyma_chrono-5250005.JPG

Cyma_chrono-5250006.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The movement is a A.Michel S.A Grenchen usually just prefixed as A.M movements the teeth look not to be meshing correctly as opposed to excessive wear so more a problem with the setting lever than the wheels it looks like to me

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. Could I have been more wrong? Quite possibly - I've had a lot of practice. Now I need to take a look at the setting lever - may be an easier fix than I thought. Are you absolutely certain about the movement? Not questioning you just interested in not having to be in any doubt.

And now that you've pointed it out, it's pretty obvious that the teeth aren't engaging fully - barely at all. How did I miss this? Same answer as above.

Roy

Edited by skridlov
lack of forethought
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to do your research when dealing with watches of this vintage on the bottom plate of your watch there are 2 markings one is a triangle made up of a A and M so that tells me that its a Adolf.Michel movement, there is also a second symbol shaped like a shield this is a Ebauches Trust mark also know as Ebauches S.A which was a small group of movement manufactures who in 1926 set up a partnership to pool resources in developing movements in order to survive against larger manufactures Adolf.Michel was one of the founding members of that group, the mark on your watch was fairly short lived and ran from 1936 to around 1939 so your watch movement dates from that period.

It looks like a calibre 237 from the dial side so you need to measure the width of the movement and confirm its a 12 ligne movement if so that would make it a calibre 1710 finding info on watch movements of this vintage is very hard finding parts is almost impossible, for a positive identification you will probably need a Bestfit book to check but you have been given enough information for you to do your research.

Other things I can tell you about your watch are that it is a British military issue watch issued by the Hydrographic Service  to the Fleet Air Arm so you maybe better doing more research along those lines, I think I have a reference book with this watch in, but I am at work at the moment so will look tomorrow when I get home,

Wayne

Edited by wls1971
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Wayne, a detailed and painstaking contribution.

I'm not entirely green when it comes to identifying movements - I have a Paulson catalogue and use the Ranfft site plus the usual web searches. I was misdirected a bit as my friend with whom I jointly buy and sell stuff was adamant about it being a Cyma. Strange how that sort of certainty can prevent one from starting from a blank page. There was another person keen to buy it who was equally certain and, it seems, equally in error!

Thanks again

Roy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And here's another one marked Pontiac, but with the addition of shock protection the seller also states that this movement is a Venus/AM, Venus where also members of Ebauches S.A it could be that Venus assigned there own calibre number to the A.Michel supplied Ebauches.

http://www.lamesuredutemps.com/one.cfm?Supportchoc&uuid=E278E9E8-01FE-5E41-8264B9B7B15B414D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm assuming that every time you set the watch you are work hardening the detent spring, maximum hardening is  where it meets the plate due to maximum deflection.   That's why it snaps there.  The Young's modulus may be the same but after it's reached its maximum yeid strength it breaks.  My mechanic engineering is very rusty, correct me if I'm wrong. 
    • Ah ok yes that makes sense to polish it where the arm starts to form from the body of the bridge, i thought you meant the underneath of all the arm.
    • this is something I've never quite understood about the some of the Swiss companies. In 1957 Omega was using 9010 for the keyless parts with epilam. there's been a slow migration towards using heavier lubrication's but still typically oils and epilam to keep them in place. When it seems like 9504 works so much better.  
    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
×
×
  • Create New...