Jump to content

Tungsten Carbide and screw dissolvers?


Hammer2017

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I've an old chronograph screw shoulder cutter. One of the cutters has a screw end twisted off and jammed in it (came like that - wasn't me!). The cutters are, I believe, made of tungsten carbide. I'm assuming the screw is steel. A replacement cutter will cost more than the entire unit did, so I want to try a repair first. Options are drilling out the screw shaft, or trying a screw removing fluid.

I've heard good reports about Alum dissolving steel screws, but was wondering if it will act on the tungsten carbide of the cutter also and destroy it? Anyone any ideas? The same question goes for the fluids like the Bergeon one, if anyone has any experience with them.

I'm willing to take a chance on this, as the cutter is unusable and will have to be replaced as it is, so it's worth taking a chance on repair methods. Thanks for reading!

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say try it. Leave it in the alum solution for a couple of hours, you'll see right away if it's reacting (the steel screw will turn black)

A quick internet search seems to suggest that the only way to dissolve tungsten carbide is to use a really strong acid (sulfuric, hydrochloric...).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

back and forth cold to hot may do it. Put it in the deep freezer then in a warm oven 105c/220f degree. It may work it loose. The two metals expand and contract at different rates. I have had some luck with this method.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I popped it into a warm Alum solution, and right away the cutter started to bubble, so it looks like it's not tungsten carbide after all. It's the original Bergeon model, the 30615.

That means moving on to Plan B. It's the 0.85mm cutter, so Ive got a 0.8mm drill bit to see if I can drill it out. There's not really enough of the screw sticking out to get a hold of it, so I don't know if a hot/cold approach will work. I'll keep it in the bag for if the drilling doesn't work out. Failing that, I'll replace the cutter. I got a great deal on the tool, so even replacing it will leave me at less than 25% of the cost of a new one!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks, This watch was in a box of old scrape units that a friend gave me. They used to be his late father's who was a watchmaker before the war and then continued later in life. I picked this one out as it looked like it had potential, and I liked the dial, it's been a bit of a learning curve for a beginner but I was determined to get it going. Now I'm on the final lap it feels good. I'm just wondering whether to invest in a decent set of hand placement tools or stick with the cheap Chinese red thing I have, decisions decision 😆
    • An update, for everyone who contributed advice, and for those who come after with a similar problem. Based on the answers received, I decided to work on the face of the hammer first. I used a square degussit stone to guarantee a vertical surface to work against, and ground the face back until it was square across 90% of the depth. I was conscious of the risk of removing too much material.* After I'd got the shape how I wanted it, I polished the surface with lapping film. To cut a long story short, it did the trick and the hammer hasn't slipped off the cam since. Of course, that wasn't the end of my problems. Have a look at this video and tell me what you think is wrong. https://youtu.be/sgAUMIPaw98 The first four attempts show (0 to 34 sec.) the chrono seconds hand jumping forwards, the next two attempts (35 to 47 sec.) seem "normal", then on the seventh attempt (48 to 54 sec.) the seconds hand jumps to 5 sec. and the minute counter jumps to 1. The rest of the video just shows repeats of these three variants. I solved it by rotating the minute counter finger on the chronograph (seconds) runner relative to the cam.  I'd be interested to hear your opinions on that. It seemed to be the right thing to do, but maybe I've introduced another problem I'm not aware of. * What is the correct relationship between the two hammers and cams, by the way? Should both hammers strike the cams exactly at the same time, or is it correct for the minute counter hammer to be a bit behind the seconds hammer? In this picture, I removed the adjusting screw at 1, and the hammers are contacting the cams simultaneously at 3 and 4. I had to turn the screw down tight to achieve this condition after stoning the seconds hammer and replacing the bridge.
    • It was easy enough to pop off. Once I had the cannon pinion hanging on the blades of the stump, I got my #2 tweezers on the gear attached to the staff and levered it down. That way none of the force was on the brass wheel itself.   I reinstalled it and the bridge, and it looks like a small but reasonable amount of end shake. It also spins easily with a blower. It stops quickly, but I think that's due to the large shoulder and about what I'd expect from this wheel.  
    • Oh, right. For some reason I was picturing a monocoque case in my head. Good looking watch!
    • Well said Ross. My reason for the thread, i like many of us dont want to lose the forum, such a well knitted group of individuals i feel. But things can happen out of anyone's control. Would be nice to have something in place just in case, if anyone has any ideas please speak up. 
×
×
  • Create New...