Jump to content

Mainspring sizing variables


Recommended Posts

I'm attempting to do my first repair requiring disassembly. I thought I'd start with a mainspring as a (relatively) straightforward first attempt - on a 1930s Ingersoll 7 jewel watch: I've decided to leave the Patek Chrono until later :)

I'm having a bit of difficulty sourcing a matching replacement.According to my measurements the original measures as follows:

Height 1.7mm. Thickness 0.14. Barrel diameter 11.5. Barrel arbor 3.7. Length (approx) 32cm

The spring has a single hole at the arbor end and a foldback of about 6mm at the periphery.

The nearest I can come up with on the Cousins UK site is the GR4938TR (1.70 x 0.12 x 380 x 11.5TR). Of course whether the broken spring is original is anyone's guess - I can't even identify the movement closer than cal 12 (?) if that's what the 12 on the bottom plate indicates.

Overall, what is the flexibility in sizing for a rough and ready job like this one? It would do my aged confidence no end of good to accomplish this successfully so please forgive the questions that will surely follow...

Thanks, Roy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just found this alternative on obsoletewatchparts site:

1.70 X 0.135 X 340 X 11 swiss  MS3675  4.50

 

Not entirely clear about the fitting (the site says "hook type").

Roy

Edited by skridlov
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I should get commission from the author of this page as I've posted links to it about 3 times over the last month... but it really is very good!

http://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/blogmainsprings.php

So you will see that length is probably the least important characteristic (within reason), but thickness is very important. Use the calculator on the above page to infer the thickness and length from the barrel inside diameter. The height should be about 0.2mm less than the space inside the barrel.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, transporter said:

Listen to Stuart Roy he knows his onions, and has just helped me out with the same website link

Onions are not really my speciality, and just to be clear I have no qualifications in horology either.  Like the author of the link I posted, I am an engineer by qualification, and I love his approach to the problem.  Since I was knee high to my grandfather I was taught by him that there was nothing which couldn't be repaired, some things just take a little more learning than others.  I tend to over think and over research every problem I face and so I have read widely around the subject. Like a signature that someone else on here uses, I probably need to spend more time at my bench repairing watches and less time on the internet learning theory.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks folks! I actually found the nawcc page which has the mainspring calculator. I was thrown out a bit when I looked at Cousins' listing where it was a case of deciding which parameter was least important - and assumed that an incorrect value would result in slippage. I know David Boetcher's site which is invaluable in many respects but hadn't stumbled across the link above as his site lacks a search engine.

I'm really interested in this subject and have a vast number of watches here (literally) requiring attention of all kinds. I've had various involvements with many kinds of engineering albeit without any formal training. Most recently in IT, before that in analogue video electronics and before that with mining equipment. I'd be happy to offer an opinion to anyone needing to extract tracked vehicles from severe bogging. I'm well aware that working on watches is a very particular kind of challenge to take up so late in life...

 

bogged-cat.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Put the movement in a movement holder and it will be supported as you push down on the setting lever post to release the winding stem. Make sure the post is over the shoulder of the movement holder so what you are pressing down on is supported. As a general rule, hold the movement and not the movement holder. Replace the hands when the movement isn't in the case and support the centre jewel (if it has one) on a hard surface or staking block when replacing the hands to stop the jewel accidentally moving or even coming out. A dedicated movement holder with a central jewel support is even better, but pricey
    • It might help us if we knew which watch like model number.
    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is. I've attached a lesson regarding mainsprings, focussing on the size and strength of the spring within the barrel, you might find helpful. Unfortunately it is a PDF converted from a PowerPoint presentation, but only a slide was lost that was originally a video of fitting a mainspring   Lesson 5 The mainspring.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...