Jump to content

Mainspring sizing variables


Recommended Posts

I'm attempting to do my first repair requiring disassembly. I thought I'd start with a mainspring as a (relatively) straightforward first attempt - on a 1930s Ingersoll 7 jewel watch: I've decided to leave the Patek Chrono until later :)

I'm having a bit of difficulty sourcing a matching replacement.According to my measurements the original measures as follows:

Height 1.7mm. Thickness 0.14. Barrel diameter 11.5. Barrel arbor 3.7. Length (approx) 32cm

The spring has a single hole at the arbor end and a foldback of about 6mm at the periphery.

The nearest I can come up with on the Cousins UK site is the GR4938TR (1.70 x 0.12 x 380 x 11.5TR). Of course whether the broken spring is original is anyone's guess - I can't even identify the movement closer than cal 12 (?) if that's what the 12 on the bottom plate indicates.

Overall, what is the flexibility in sizing for a rough and ready job like this one? It would do my aged confidence no end of good to accomplish this successfully so please forgive the questions that will surely follow...

Thanks, Roy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just found this alternative on obsoletewatchparts site:

1.70 X 0.135 X 340 X 11 swiss  MS3675  4.50

 

Not entirely clear about the fitting (the site says "hook type").

Roy

Edited by skridlov
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I should get commission from the author of this page as I've posted links to it about 3 times over the last month... but it really is very good!

http://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/blogmainsprings.php

So you will see that length is probably the least important characteristic (within reason), but thickness is very important. Use the calculator on the above page to infer the thickness and length from the barrel inside diameter. The height should be about 0.2mm less than the space inside the barrel.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, transporter said:

Listen to Stuart Roy he knows his onions, and has just helped me out with the same website link

Onions are not really my speciality, and just to be clear I have no qualifications in horology either.  Like the author of the link I posted, I am an engineer by qualification, and I love his approach to the problem.  Since I was knee high to my grandfather I was taught by him that there was nothing which couldn't be repaired, some things just take a little more learning than others.  I tend to over think and over research every problem I face and so I have read widely around the subject. Like a signature that someone else on here uses, I probably need to spend more time at my bench repairing watches and less time on the internet learning theory.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks folks! I actually found the nawcc page which has the mainspring calculator. I was thrown out a bit when I looked at Cousins' listing where it was a case of deciding which parameter was least important - and assumed that an incorrect value would result in slippage. I know David Boetcher's site which is invaluable in many respects but hadn't stumbled across the link above as his site lacks a search engine.

I'm really interested in this subject and have a vast number of watches here (literally) requiring attention of all kinds. I've had various involvements with many kinds of engineering albeit without any formal training. Most recently in IT, before that in analogue video electronics and before that with mining equipment. I'd be happy to offer an opinion to anyone needing to extract tracked vehicles from severe bogging. I'm well aware that working on watches is a very particular kind of challenge to take up so late in life...

 

bogged-cat.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...