Jump to content

Today’s Competition 3


oldhippy

Recommended Posts

When it comes to Longcase Clocks or Grandfather clocks as they are known it can be a minefield knowing what is correct. We have 4 dials here so can you give the correct range of dates when they would have appeared.  

1.jpg

23.jpg

2.jpg

24.jpg

Edited by oldhippy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your best yet oldhippy. Found it difficult because not just the dials are indicators of the date (I think)

However heres my shot:

1) 1775-1780
2) 1810-1820
3) 1790-1830 (Thomas Dickinson)
4) 1810-1812

How you dated them will be of interest to me for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I think they are,

1, A  clock dial with 5 minute divisions and roman hour numerals and simple corner decoration made between 1770 and 1800.

2 and 3, 1800-1830 with 3 probably being the eairlier of the two shown as it still retains the 5 minute markings

4, 1830 onwards to about 1870 the more paint the later the dial as a rough rule of thumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wis1971 is the winner. You sure know your Longcase dials or do you have a good book.:D

Here is the correct info. I put two dials in with the same date but that did not fool you. Dials are put into periods of date. What you might come across is a clock outside of the dates this is down to places away from what is in with the dial makes and their stock might be a bit behind the times to what is being produced in the cities, this happens a lot the further north you go, then you have to look at the case. A quick tip with the case is the door, long slender doors are early short wide doors are very late.

 

Period one dials date from about 1770 to about 1800 and look more or less like this:

Picture 1, The hour numerals are in Roman lettering (FROM I to XII) and the minute numerals are in arabic (5 to 60) numbered every five minutes (often called five minute numbering).

Period one dials date from about 1770 to about 1800 and look more or less like this:

The hour numerals are in Roman lettering (FROM I to XII) and the minute numerals are in arabic (5 to 60) numbered every five minutes (often called five minute numbering).

 

Picture 2 and 3,

Period two dials change in three distinct ways.

Whereas period one corner decoration tends to be simple gold scrollwork or little flowers, fruit or the occasional bird, period two dials tend to have either geometric shapes, or shells, or abstract patterns – usually with a little more colour than period one.

Period two dials start to lose the five minute numbering and this is replaced with fifteen minute numbering (15,30,45,60) possibly in slightly smaller size, around the hour numbers.

The Hour numerals are often in arabic rather than roman style.

Period two tends to cover the period 1800 to 1825-30

Picture 4

Period three dials are from 1830 onwards until the demise of longcase clockmaking about 1850-70.

The minute numbering has disappeared completely and the hour numerals are back as Roman numerals, (I, II, III, IIII, V, VI, etc..)

The corner decoration tends to be full colour scenes, often of country scenes, sometimes of the four seasons, countries (England, Scotland, Ireland, Wales) or the four continents.

Sometimes there are specific corner or arch paintings to do with trade or commerce or perhaps with a religious or masonic theme.

Thanks to all that took part and to those for looking. In my time I must have restored hundreds of these clocks from 30hour 8day and month duration, Many extremely early.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know of this one. The thing with hands they get broken and they can be replaced which is not that difficult. They have a story in themselves as old ones will be thick and its easy to pick out the hand made from the mass produced, but handmade Longcase clock hands can be obtained today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I guess the correct order of age half correct, got the first two correct, but got the last two around the wrong way, but I was going by hand styles from De Carles watch and clock encyclopaedia. Thanks for the information on the dials as I definately learnt something here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I voted leave too, my reasoning was the the EU is undemocratic, no elected officials. I don't regret it but I  am sad that both sides acted like petulant toddlers.  Shameful.  I'm not on other forums but if I was and left this site, would you shun me? Of course not, we aren't petulant toddlers.  
    • This is a type of tool that may be suitable to remove the bezel - though note that I'm pretty sure the watch should be face down - not face up, as in some of the photos of these tools on amazon & ebay! If you try one one of those, put the movement screws back in first to avoid accidents. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Removal-Professional-Remover-Watchmaker-Diameter/dp/B09XCH4QVN?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&smid=A296NCMMFVXSDN&th=1  
    • Hi, I’m constantly asking my wife to help me with removing the stem in order to complete casing. To expand, this is not a challenge for me when the setting lever is secured by a screw (older calibers). However when the setting lever is attached to a spring loaded setting lever axel, like on more modern calibers, I simply don’t see how to apply enough pressure on the button to get the stem out short of putting the movement face down with the dial and hands attached, which I’m loath to do in order to avoid damaging the dial/hands? what technique should I be using? thanks  
    • Many thanks for your advice (being borne in mind at present) & offer Dell. When I was given the clock the plastic anchor was loose on the arbour (it had split at the 'hole') &, after repairing this, I have been trying to determine whether the spindle (pin) should be perpendicular when the pallet is sitting on a flat surface; or whether, when installed, its L-R extremes (or alternatively its tick & tock points) should lie at equal angles from the vertical when moved with spring absent. I can get the clock to run but in every such configuration the top block has to be turned anti-clockwise (from above) by quite a bit in order to be 'in beat' & it always runs fast (despite the pendulum being set to as slow as possible). This makes me wonder if there is any particular feature of/fault in a torsion spring clock which determines which turn direction (if any) is necessary to get it 'in beat'; & whether there would be a different set of settings that would get it running nearer to time at somewhere around the mid timing/inertia position which would then allow tweaking of the fast/slow setting.
    • Now this has happened I bet China or India just to name two will start to produce none genuine parts.  I did. But idiot Boris Johnson failed miserably in his negotiations. The E U stitched up the UK like a kipper. Nigel Farage  offered his help but big head Boris declined. So this is why we are in this mess all because Johnson wasn't clever enough.  
×
×
  • Create New...