Jump to content

Elgin Unitas 6498 Balance Spring.


Recommended Posts

I'm having a problem with the balance spring stud that seems to be stuck on the regulator arm. The lock screw is missing and the stud seems to be different from other ones I've seen. Has anyone ever come across a similar problem or know if the stud is the right one? I hope It wasn't set in with loctite, and I know this is a delicate situation... any advice is truly appreciated.4825b66a749bffb5b3058a93153101c5.jpg8dadb904a7d112df6c381945c21f9712.jpg4ff2b1c8f540a362c85fbe553175c0d4.jpg5177f02c426f33de56d91fa65514a93b.jpg
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that is your biggest problem (though it is a problem). Your regulator is broken - you only have the "boot" - there should be a pin at it's right (in pictures).

Matabog, thanks... I kinda figured that something was missing from there and I've never seen these older 6498 movements.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had this problem & I pushed it out with my staking tool. You have to use a stump that is open both ends so the hairspring is not damaged. 

Clockboy, I'm going to attempt that tonight and hope that I can successfully remove the pin without damaging the hairspring, although the hairspring is already deformed and looks bad. I'll probably want to replace it if I can't manipulate it back to a decent shape...so this will be good practice for me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, madchops67 said:


Clockboy, I'm going to attempt that tonight and hope that I can successfully remove the pin without damaging the hairspring, although the hairspring is already deformed and looks bad. I'll probably want to replace it if I can't manipulate it back to a decent shape...so this will be good practice for me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Take your time making sure you do not damage the hairspring or bend the arm. If I remember correctly the one I moved was with a firm push.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, clockboy said:

Take your time making sure you do not damage the hairspring or bend the arm. If I remember correctly the one I moved was with a firm push.

I tried last night to attempt to remove with a firm push as well but to no avail. I'm thinking it may have loctite considering there isn't a lock screw to hold the stud. Hopefully I can get it out with a staking tool like you mentioned, and I'll try to be careful not to damage the hairspring or damage the arm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried last night to attempt to remove with a firm push as well but to no avail. I'm thinking it may have loctite considering there isn't a lock screw to hold the stud. Hopefully I can get it out with a staking tool like you mentioned, and I'll try to be careful not to damage the hairspring or damage the arm. 

Can't you stake this out? Use a stake and a bench block


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Success!!! Got the hairspring manipulated back to a decent shape and seems to be running smoothly than before. Thanks guys for all your input. Clockboy, I was extra careful not to damage the hairspring for it takes patience and a great of steady hands that I don't have...yet. [emoji1360] 937f122adfdfb16127e3e60c212ed403.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may sound a bit daft but I'm beginning to conclude that the stud clamping screw is so much missing as intentionally omitted.

I currently have a 17J UT6497 in a Le Cheminant pocket watch and a 17J UT6498 in a Summit pocket watch, both from the late 70's/early 80's, and both without stud clamping screws. I was going to try and fit a screw to the 6497 as believed it to be missing, but recently acquiring the 6498 with the same omission suggested that it was intentional. Now this post convinces me even more.

It begs the question "why?", although the stud does seem to be quite secure in both cases. Thankfully neither watch is in need of any H/S adjustment else it would be more of an issue.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marc.  Maybe the "screw" hole stops just short of breaking through into the stud hole to allow a small punch to be used to dimple the stud hole slightly.  This would allow the stud to be gripped in the hole and also allow further tightening of the stud in the hole later on if required.   Just a thought!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could You replace the missing regulator pin? 
The end curve seems still distorted from here [emoji4]

The hairspring would definitely need a replacement, although I didn't have to fuss with the removal I was able to form the spring somewhat back to a decent shape to get the movement going. Next phase would be replace the spring and strip down into the ultrasonic cleaner.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...