Jump to content

You Make This Look So Easy...


RayCJ

Recommended Posts

Hi...  I'm joining mainly to make a financial donation as payment for knowledge passed along in one of Mark's YouTube videos on how to regulate a common Seiko movement.

From grade school years (1960’s) thru the 1990’s I wore wristwatches daily.   I’m going full-circle and instead of relying on a cell phone to read the time, I’m trading-in the electronic slave devices and am wearing wristwatches again.   My new watches are two Seiko Sport 5’s; one with a 7S26 and the other with a 7S36 movement.  They were running out about 20s per day and after a little trial and error (and help from Mark’s video) they’re holding about 7-8 seconds/day.

Although my formal background is electrical and computer engineering, my hobbies are related to mechanics and machine-shop work.  My lathes and mills each weigh-in around 2000lb (~900kg).  On the small side of things, I’ve made countless jigs, fixtures and molds... I don’t think I’ll be making any watch parts on my shop machines.    I’m amazed at how the horology technicians make this look so easy to do and especially enjoy seeing the specialized tools used in the horology business.  I’m tempted to get some broken movements and try my hand at repairing them.

Anyhow, I would like to purchase one or two additional wrist watches in the future.  So far, Hamilton is catching my eye.  I will read and learn with the goal of making a smarter decision when that time comes.   I probably won’t talk too much here but if I do, I promise to be brief.

 

Thanks

 

Ray CJ

(near Annapolis, Maryland USA)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Hello! Welcome!

Electrical and computer engineering, machinist, sounds familiar :)

And please feel free to chat away. As long as you do it in the right section I don't think anyone will mind in the least. In fact, If you have your own machine shop, it would be great to see some pictures. Case work can be done on larger machines, and people are always looking for ideas on refinishing and making custom cases.

Have Fun!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi dadistic.  Thanks for the welcome!

Most of machinist work I did was "one-off" recreations or emergency repairs of parts related to recreational and luxury yachts.  I was supporting the needs of a good friend who owns a large marina repair shop.  My father was an old-school tool & die maker and I worked in his shop from childhood until I graduated college.  I did a lot of work that required certified heat treating and most finished products weighed between 5 and 50 lbs (2-12kg).  The watchmaking world is a universe away from what I'm familiar with.  Here's a few photos of some smaller precision pieces.  Some are stainless steel and some are alloy steel, heat treated in the 55 Rockwell-C range.  Typical tolerances on these were around -0, +0.0003".  

When it comes to metals, metallurgy, mechanics and fundamental shop knowledge, I can chime-in on a few things if it would be helpful.  My real goal though, is to understand the differences and trade-offs in the various watch movements.  I'm rather captivated by wearing a mechanical watch after decades of telling time with digital cell phones.  In that regard, I place myself firmly in "student mode".

 

Ray

T4.JPG

T11.JPG

T6.JPG

C3.JPG

C5.JPG

P4.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the pictures! Holding 3 tenths is no small achievement, you must have gained some chops as a young'un

Anyway, all I can say is if you get some really good magnification, and then examine a watch movement, things will look very familiar :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL... Yeah... Finding proper fitting winter gloves still proves to be a challenge...

3 tenths is not too hard depending on the circumstances.  Of course, the pieces I worked on were much bigger than anything found inside a watch mechanism. Most of the work I did was +/- one thou which is pretty attainable if everything in the shop is running right.  In watchmaking, the tolerance level magnitudes are just a few orders of magnitude smaller than the parts themselves.  That ups the skill level of watch making exponentially I should think.

No disrespect intended but, I have no desire to get into watchmaking.  My eyes are still good, my hands are still steady despite nerve damage from cuts, burns and misc injuries but, I don't have the right personal temperament to be a watch maker.   I know my way around CAD and CAM and used to own/run Hurco 4 axis CNC machines.  I can't imagine the cost involved in the high-end machines for mass producing watch parts.  I don't even know who makes that kind of equipment and I sure don't think I have the patience to hand-cut miniature gears.   I would love to learn how to do basic service/cleaning though.

 

Ah... you're in Chicago.  I was born/raised there.

 

Ray

Edited by RayCJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh oh, this could spell trouble...  I've been very happy to wear wristwatches most recently again and decided to dress-up some recently acquired Seikos with nice leather bands.  While I was at it, I ordered a Model 1000 Timegrapher and will try my hand at observing their performance and possibly optimizing it.  As things proceed, I'll document the observations and results in a different thread in an appropriate forum here.   

So far, I've truly enjoyed all the educational videos.  1st class materials for sure.  Some day, I'd like to find a broken watch and try to repair it or possibly, purchase a very inexpensive new watch as a test specimen.

Somehow, I get the feeling this might lead to a fun new hobby...  We shall see...

 

Regards

Ray

 

BTW:  Here are the watches I now have.   

http://www.jomashop.com/seiko-watch-snk809.html

http://www.jomashop.com/seiko-watch-snk803.html

http://www.jomashop.com/seiko-5-mens-watch-snzg09.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Ray,

Welcome to the forum and thanks for the insight into your skills.  Like yourself I have a boundary line and stick to tinkering, actual watch making is way beyond me but I like tinkering especially with the watches that seem to be lost causes.  I find it both relaxing and frustrating which although dichotomous, if it leads to success, gives great pleasure and fun.

I have so many projects I have lost count.  I started with a small group of watches mainly accutrons but went on to add pure mechanicals.  I still don't know what I am doing sometimes but the forum buddies amongst whom are many pro's and long time repairers who have always bailed me out and I can now contribute sometimes.

The caveat is that It does draw you in, however, as a hobby you will find it engaging and of course you can wear your success on your wrist as well.

Cheers,

Vic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One of the things that I've been bothered with lately is timekeeping? For instance a 90-year-old pocket watch what so to timekeeping was it supposed to keep? They publish railroad timekeeping but I don't know how well normal non-railroad watches were supposed to keep time. The reason why the question comes up for me is I spend a lot of time at work adjusting watches to keep really really good time  because I have to please my boss where as when the watch was made I have to wonder what kind timekeeping would've been acceptable. After all they typically didn't have timing machines 100 years ago and they were timing and six positions certainly not for the non-railroad grade watch. On the other hand I do get paid by the hour so maybe I shouldn't be concerned of how much time I Spend trying to make everything keep chronometer timekeeping almost. Citing a Delta of 40 seconds for a 90-year-old watch is quite outstanding.
    • That's an interesting question which I don't think I've seen explained anywhere. But I think the problem will go away just about instantaneously. In other words the  coating is really thin and it should go away almost immediately. So the problem should resolve itself extremely fast.  
    • I experienced that different types of shellac and their ages are affected differently by IPA. Sometimes the shellac dissolves in a few seconds and sometimes several minutes are required. Nowadays I never let shellac come into contact with IPA. It's a hotly debated topic here on WRT if you search. Like John, I don't think you need to worry about the weight of the shellac, but instead that it might start rubbing against something. When I learned how to adjust pallet stones, I tried documenting my experiences in this thread. Hopefully, it can help you. I personally don't believe in the idea of abrading the epilame before oiling so I don't think you need to think or worry about it. The only time I've heard anyone mention this is Alex on the YouTube channel Watch Repair Tutorials but actually no one else. I'm not saying it's "wrong" just that I don't think it's necessary or adds anything.
    • Typically for introductions all you would have to say is hi I am interested in repairing watches and nobody's going to care about the technical details. Then to certain degree the introductions are not life or death in some cases I guess it depends upon what you did when you came to the discussion group. It's good that you're getting a balance complete for variety of reasons and getting a bonus balance bridge. Because I want you to pay attention to something when you get it as your hairspring still has a problem quite an amusing problem in a way. You notice your hairspring stud is a triangle or shape and it fits into a triangular shaped hole. It also notice how your hairspring has some weird bending right around the stud? So when you get your new balance bridge and the balance complete if you look carefully you'll find that I'm pretty sure the stud will be rotated and that they hairspring will come out the end not the way it's coming here you have managed to twist the stud putting it into the hole and that's why it looks so bad in the previous image. If you are skilled at fixing hairsprings which are not you can fix this. On the other hand are getting replacement so that's good. No it's supposed to be straight up and down. So in addition to twisting the stud you also bent it. On the other hand this is the most common place where people like to bend their hairspring and yes if you had practice with bending hairsprings this is all relatively sort of easy to fix. But I would really suggest practicing on another watch or basically scrap of balance wheels off of eBay that nobody cares about. Because practicing on something you care about really isn't the best. Then the reason I wanted the image below was to see how the balance jewel assembly is attached to the bridge. Sometimes it needed jeweling tool to push it out but in this particular case all you have to do is remove the U-shaped clip in the whole thing falls apart. But if you're lucky here replacement balance bridge will solve the problem.
    • I still need to see the complete movement as there are many types of Elgin movements. The part that you are holding is called a snail. 
×
×
  • Create New...