Jump to content

Le Cheminant 25 jewel Master Mariner Super Compressor


Recommended Posts

Can anyone please give me guidance on the case back removal of a Le Cheminant 25 jewel Master Mariner Super Compressor?  The case back looks like a regular snap on with an even bigger gap between the back and the rest of the case to insert a case opening knife but no matter how I try I cant  seem to lever it off. Obviously I dont want to ruin the back but I'm getting ready to throw it.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it definitley a Super Compressor there are two types of Super Compressor case back one is a screw down and one is a bayonet fitting both require a wrench to remove. Compressor and Compressor 2 case backs are snap on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can be very difficult to remove and a proper caseback opener not a knife would be the best option, they can be particually difficult if the gasket has degraded and formed a gum between back and case.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know if you have noticed or maybe you have removed it but the bezel is missing from the watch, and what is the curios word under the divers helmet on the back I can read suspe, have you a picture of the inside of the case back ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wls1971 said:

I dont know if you have noticed or maybe you have removed it but the bezel is missing from the watch, and what is the curios word under the divers helmet on the back I can read suspe, have you a picture of the inside of the case back ?

Seems to say SUSPENSE

Neil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The word is SUSPENSE....Perhaps it is because you have to wait so long to see inside because the back is so difficult to remove.

The bezel came of when struggling to remove said case back....Now I cant get it back on

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now and again you come across a real tight one. I purchased this tool and only use it with the tight one's but it works a treat. There are other styles but this works for me

58ce2f3e8b2d1_ScreenShot2017-03-19at07_10_57.png.d6f305e2b0d1c438ec93737ed8c8a827.png

To re-fit a tight case back or bezel you really need a case/crystal press. I prefer the screw style as these give more control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look on the inside of the case back there is quite often but not always a 3 to 4 digit date code usually the month and year of manufacture  seperated by a dash, SUSPENSE intresting but never seen that before

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"SUSPENSE" think I have found out what it is the movement is held in place with rubber blocks between the movement spacer ring and case to protect against shocks, I have a IWC yacht club that uses this kind of shock protection

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@chrisdt I wonder if you would be good enough to post a picture of the bezel. I have what appears to be an identical Master Mariner in an EPSA Compressor case (which also says "SUSPENSE" on the back) except mine has an AS1903 inside (I suspect yours is probably also a 1903 as the 1906 is a day/date whereas the 1903 is just date).

Mine came in a job lot of stuff and is not as tidy as yours but it is on my list of projects to sort out. Mine didn't have a bezel when I got it and I assumed that it wasn't supposed to have one but you say that yours does. A pic would be most helpful as I would then know what to look out for.

Like yours mine is an absolute pig to open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your right about the rubber blocks wls 1971. In my opinion not a very good idea as they are starting to disintegrate and it would be almost impossible to remove them without them breaking up completely. Not impressed.

Pictures of the bezel for you @Marc

P1010036.JPG

P1010037.JPG

P1010038.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks @chrisdt, the pics are very useful. I might even have a crack at machining up a replacement bezel myself.

I had forgotten about the rubber shock mounting of the movement to the case. This is a system that Certina have used for a long time in their DS range. I wonder if there is any published data as to how effective it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...