Jump to content

Push button stem release Procedure ??


Recommended Posts

Recently, working on a Molnija 3602, which has a push-button stem release, I couldn't get the winding stem back in. The keyless works were in the neutral or "winding" position. Had to strip the hands, the dial and found the clutch-wheel detached from the clutch lever, or the other way around if you like. After several dry-runs I noticed that in order to get the winding stem back in successfully, the keyless works had to be in the "time-setting-position". In this position the clutch-wheel was pushed firmly, and hold in place against the main plate. In the neutral or winding position, any movement to the clutch-wheel, while inserting the stem, caused the clutch-wheel to disengage from the lever. By having the clutch-wheel pushed firmly against the main plate, inserting of the stem didn't cause this disengagement.

Also some main-plates do have a protruding bushing where the tip of the winding stem sits in, but this bushing also centralizes the clutch-wheel in the time-setting-position;

58bd8cf28067e_Keylessenlarged.jpg.a0766d68335f49423095887b14a9f59e.jpg

Working on another watch and speaking to a fellow enthusiast, I was advised to make sure to engage the keyless works in the time-setting-position before pulling the stem. Failure to do so, and the chances were high that I wouldn't be able to get the winding-stem back in, with the obvious consequences of having to remove the hands, dial etc etc.

My question are; are there any advised procedure what's the best & safest ? Pro's & con's? Are there "One size fit all" procedures ??

Please your thoughts and or comments ?

Thanks on beforehand ;)

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps my questions were confusing? Taking the above observations in consideration, please allow me to rephrase them;

1) is it better to pull a winding stem with the keyless works in the winding (neutral) position?

or

2) Is it better to pull a winding stem with the keyless work in the time-setting position?

or

3) It depends .....

It would be nice to also receive technical support why one way is preferred above the other, or why it "depends"....

Hope to hear ...... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not answering this question ... just saying it is a very timely one to ask for me too!

If I have a movement where it's a screw to remove the stem then happy days. If it's a movement where it's a push button things aren't always straightforward. I've just worked on an MSR T43 and, like you, had no choice but to remove the hands and dial in order to figure out why things wouldn't seat properly after a simple mainspring replacement. Don't push the button enough you can't get the stem out; push too much and something becomes displaced. Grrr.

So with the general question being what's the fail safe way to deal with push button stems so they can be removed and put back with confidence by not messing something up in the keyless works ... then it's a second from me for any good advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, it depends. Some movements (esp quartz) have a lever with a dimple. This dimple is only visible and pressable when the stem is in the correct position.

Where the stem and keyless works are in good condition, the stem will only come out in the correct position. When there is wear or damage it can be pot luck.

Have I screwed up the keyless works by getting it wrong? Oh yes.

Neil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Endeavor said:

@anilv Does your remark suggest we are drifting to the "it depends" answer?

Hi Endeavor,

I've had problems with ETA movements ... removing and installing in the handsetting position helps.

Not sure about other movements. On a related note, Miyota autos sometimes do not handwind after setting the time. This is usually because the intermediate winding wheel does not move freely. Pulling the crown to hand setting position and flicking it with your finger to get it back to the neutral position sometimes works.

Anil

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • An update, for everyone who contributed advice, and for those who come after with a similar problem. Based on the answers received, I decided to work on the face of the hammer first. I used a square degussit stone to guarantee a vertical surface to work against, and ground the face back until it was square across 90% of the depth. I was conscious of the risk of removing too much material.* After I'd got the shape how I wanted it, I polished the surface with lapping film. To cut a long story short, it did the trick and the hammer hasn't slipped off the cam since. Of course, that wasn't the end of my problems. Have a look at this video and tell me what you think is wrong. https://youtu.be/sgAUMIPaw98 The first four attempts show (0 to 34 sec.) the chrono seconds hand jumping forwards, the next two attempts (35 to 47 sec.) seem "normal", then on the seventh attempt (48 to 54 sec.) the seconds hand jumps to 5 sec. and the minute counter jumps to 1. The rest of the video just shows repeats of these three variants. I solved it by rotating the minute counter finger on the chronograph (seconds) runner relative to the cam.  I'd be interested to hear your opinions on that. It seemed to be the right thing to do, but maybe I've introduced another problem I'm not aware of. * What is the correct relationship between the two hammers and cams, by the way? Should both hammers strike the cams exactly at the same time, or is it correct for the minute counter hammer to be a bit behind the seconds hammer? In this picture, I removed the adjusting screw at 1, and the hammers are contacting the cams simultaneously at 3 and 4. I had to turn the screw down tight to achieve this condition after stoning the seconds hammer and replacing the bridge.
    • It was easy enough to pop off. Once I had the cannon pinion hanging on the blades of the stump, I got my #2 tweezers on the gear attached to the staff and levered it down. That way none of the force was on the brass wheel itself.   I reinstalled it and the bridge, and it looks like a small but reasonable amount of end shake. It also spins easily with a blower. It stops quickly, but I think that's due to the large shoulder and about what I'd expect from this wheel.  
    • Oh, right. For some reason I was picturing a monocoque case in my head. Good looking watch!
    • Well said Ross. My reason for the thread, i like many of us dont want to lose the forum, such a well knitted group of individuals i feel. But things can happen out of anyone's control. Would be nice to have something in place just in case, if anyone has any ideas please speak up. 
    • Ok thanks Ross, I will give that a try!😁
×
×
  • Create New...