Jump to content

"Rough" winding on Calibre 11 when micro rotor installed


sstakoff

Recommended Posts

Have a Breitling Calibre 11-i (Same as Heuer, Buren, etc) - Chronomatic with the micro rotor. Part numbers below reference the technical docs, which can be found here:

https://www.calibre11.com/catalogues/vintage-heuer-catalogues/1969-calibre-11-technical-manual/

 

When the micro rotor is removed, the watch winds very smoothly - as expected. However, with the micro rotor installed, the winding is somewhat "crunchy". With the rotor removed, when the wig-wag pinion (1500) is out of contact with the winding-up wheel (1480) and reduction wheel (1481), winding is smooth. If I engage the wig-wag pinion with the winding up wheel, this will result in the clutch on the coupling wheel (1521) slipping as it should. The heavy feeling comes from the clutch action. The real question here is whether or not the wig wag pinion is supposed to remain engaged or if it's supposed to move out of the way when manually winding. I have tried lubricating the wig wag with the technical manual recommendation of 9020 (visco lube) and also with a more modern D-5. Same results. I have also lubricated the coupling clutch with the recommended KT-22.

It is possible that the feeling I sense is perfectly normal and expected for this calibre - I'm just not certain. Would appreciate any insight.

 

Stu

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SSTEEL said:

Reverse wheel lubrication dried up?

Don't think so. This type of watch has an external click for the wind-up and reduction gears. I did a full cleaning and lubrication of all components.

Edited by sstakoff
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That gritty feeling when hand winding is perfectly normal and is simply a function of the 3 pronged star type ratchet system.

I did a walk through on a Hamilton Cal.92 (Buren 1281) here;

It does feel odd but it is no a fault.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...