Jump to content

New tool received from Boley


SSTEEL

Recommended Posts

Damn this is is amazing, price not so much, but it sure is very well made.

32723714712_991207021d_z.jpgDSC05374 by Micky Aldridge, on Flickr

Anyone else have one, and if so, do you know the best base plate for off-centre pusher work, i.e. chronographs, ETA 7750/53?  I have a new movement holder for these two movements on back order, but unsure of the base plate I need.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Micky, I have a couple of hand presses.  The old one is a twin station version of the press you have and is built like a brick sh** house; the second single station press is more lightweight.

Both of these give a huge amount of feel when fitting hands, but I have made adjustments to the single stage one to give great sensitivity and feel. The anvil fitted to this press is made of high density polythene and prevents the movement being marked.

The small anvil, Bergeon 5409 is a great addition.  It has a centre pin that rises to support the bottom pinion when pressing hands on.  This eliminates the possibility of moving the bottom jewel during the process.  It is not suitable for all movements though.

IMG_3088.JPG

IMG_3095.JPG

IMG_3096.JPG

IMG_3097.JPG

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers for that @Geo   I will certainly look into that, but for 28XX ETA movements I have this slick movement holder, and found it fits the base of this Bergeon hand press perfectly.  Its the base plate for 7750, and 7753 movements I wish to find, a base which allows for off centre pressing of the small chronograph hands.

32839951746_93aa726690_k.jpgSlick 11/1/2 Inge fits perfectly by Micky Aldridge, on Flickr

@sstakoff The timegrapher is amazing, so many settings, and custom settings, memory, print out functionality, and readout options, loving it, esp[ecially with the auto mic, I can let it run a custom test of all six positions whilst I carry on with other work.

@clockboy I have both of the Horotec hand pressed, the singular type, and the trio model, I found the trio press tool a waste of month if I'm honest as the two pillars obstruct many movement holders for the two end pushers to be used.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SSTEEL said:

 The timegrapher is amazing, so many settings, and custom settings, memory, print out functionality, and readout options, loving it, esp[ecially with the auto mic, I can let it run a custom test of all six positions whilst I carry on with other work.

Thank you. Appreciate the review. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just read the paperwork that came with the 8935 press, and it shows an intermediate plate for offset driving.  Typical of me to not read the instructions, I have the part number too, so will order that next.

This is the movement holder I have on back order with Boley, and right now, I am unsure if it will be useable with this press, if not, a good reason to look for a singular like Geo's?

32038343254_fb44161cf7_b.jpg7750/7753 Movement holder by Micky Aldridge, on Flickr

32757386781_0b6c049e8e_k.jpgDSC05407 by Micky Aldridge, on Flickr

32727666112_ab9f8663f3_k.jpgDSC05408 by Micky Aldridge, on Flickr

Edited by SSTEEL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Geo said:

Very nice Micky, I think you might have to have have a custom base unit made.

I think you could well be right, I have a lathe, but I haven't got round to restoring it yet, let alone buy any tools to get it up and operational.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Geo said:

Hi Micky, I have a couple of hand presses.  The old one is a twin station version of the press you have and is built like a brick sh** house; the second single station press is more lightweight.

Both of these give a huge amount of feel when fitting hands, but I have made adjustments to the single stage one to give great sensitivity and feel. The anvil fitted to this press is made of high density polythene and prevents the movement being marked.

The small anvil, Bergeon 5409 is a great addition.  It has a centre pin that rises to support the bottom pinion when pressing hands on.  This eliminates the possibility of moving the bottom jewel during the process.  It is not suitable for all movements though.

IMG_3088.JPG

IMG_3095.JPG

IMG_3096.JPG

IMG_3097.JPG

So that is how it works? Seen it but never understood what it was for? Thanks  @Geo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SSTEEL said:

Cheers for that @Geo   I will certainly look into that, but for 28XX ETA movements I have this slick movement holder, and found it fits the base of this Bergeon hand press perfectly.  Its the base plate for 7750, and 7753 movements I wish to find, a base which allows for off centre pressing of the small chronograph hands.

32839951746_93aa726690_k.jpgSlick 11/1/2 Inge fits perfectly by Micky Aldridge, on Flickr

@sstakoff The timegrapher is amazing, so many settings, and custom settings, memory, print out functionality, and readout options, loving it, esp[ecially with the auto mic, I can let it run a custom test of all six positions whilst I carry on with other work.

@clockboy I have both of the Horotec hand pressed, the singular type, and the trio model, I found the trio press tool a waste of month if I'm honest as the two pillars obstruct many movement holders for the two end pushers to be used.

You can use the movement holder such as for the 7750 with the horotec but it is not as slick as the Boley or Bergeon but it does work. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, clockboy said:

You can use the movement holder such as for the 7750 with the horotec but it is not as slick as the Boley or Bergeon but it does work. 

Thats what I'm thinking in the short term, and would like to keep my Horotec presses just in case, I will let you know how I get on with the offset intermediate plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Geo said:

 It has a centre pin that rises to support the bottom pinion when pressing hands on.  This eliminates the possibility of moving the bottom jewel during the process.  It is not suitable for all movements though.

I've never understood this. What is the bottom pinion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@jdm The bottom pinion, and jewel are the rear end of the seconds wheel, if this isn't supported during the refitting of hands, you can damage that pinion/gear/jewel, thats why there is a centre post in movement holders for specific movements.

As you can see from the 7750/7753 movement holder I posted above, this has several posts, each adjustable to comfort/protect their respective jewel/pivot/gear whilst refitting the hands.

wt5092.jpg

berg1998.jpg

HMG10211.jpg?itok=VHdM8qou

Edited by SSTEEL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[mention=1542]jdm[/mention] The bottom pinion, and jewel are the rear end of the seconds wheel, if this isn't supported during the refitting of hands, you can damage that pinion/gear/jewel,

I see. On Seiko and I guess many others there are various parts in between which make that impossible so I guess it's not even needed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, jdm said:

I see. On Seiko and I guess many others there are various parts in between which make that impossible so I guess it's not even needed.

 

On Seiko chronographs such as the 6139 there's a tool which supports the jewels the same as the above tools. You fit the dial and hands before fitting the auto winding bridge. Here's a picture of the tool stolen from the internet -

717243646_o.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, chadders1966 said:

Hi

I know it's not what you were looking for but did you know Bergeon sell an offset stake attachment for small seconds/chronograph hands, 6012-SD? I imagine that would do the job on any of their hand setting tools, but who knows what it would cost!

Stephen

I did, there's two, and I have ordered them both from cousins, not cheap at £60 each.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SSTEEL said:

I did, there's two, and I have ordered them both from cousins, not cheap at £60 each.

Do you mean the plates? That's not what I referred to - Cousins don't sell the part number I mentioned as far as I can see. It fits on the end of one of the stakes and looks like it is adjustable. Was originally for a different press but I imagine it would fit.

Stephen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure whether it's discontinued, or just an older model as the construction is different. Anyway I would think all the fittings are the same size. The description for your model actually lists 6012-SD as an accessory, so I assume it will be correct for the 8935, there is no newer version of this piece.

https://shop.bergeon.ch/Catalogue/PDF/7056 S.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you so much, Hector and CJ. I appreciate the tech sheet and the video. Gasp, I think I will make the attempt. What's the worst that can happen? I think there may be a new balance complete in my future, though.  I'll update the post and let you know the result. R, Frank  
    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files Modular Movement Holder.pdf Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files: Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
    • Hi Frank, you have dived headlong into the deep end. Hairspring work has to be the scariest thing a newbie has to tackle. Your hairspring appears to be bent and just putting it back into the regulator would not allow the balance to work properly. It might start oscillating but the performance would not be good. The proper thing to do is to unstud the hairspring, remove the hairspring from the balance, reinstall the hairspring on the stud carrier, reshape the endcurve and centre the collet to the balance jewel hole. This challenge would either make you or break you. Hope that you will be able to fix your watch. Welcome to the world of watchmaking.  Watch this video. It think it'll give you an idea of the task ahead. From your 1st photo, I think you have a etachron type stud. Let me see if I can find a video on how to remove it from the arm.
    • Have read of the Tech Sheet attached on the balance section page 12. It may be bent but until you reposition it back in the regulator pins you'll never know. Cheers CJ 4R35B_4R36A.pdf
    • Aloha All, My Seiko 4R35B movement stopped working today. Upon closer inspection, it looks like the balance spring came out of the regulator pin. This is my first time working on a balance. Any advice on how to get this spring repositioned (back to normal)? I'm pretty sure that while adjusting the beat error on this movement, I must have turned the stud (I didn't even know they turned), and the spring eventually fell out.  Will the spring go back to even spacing when it's back in the pin, or does it look bent? Thanks, Frank  
×
×
  • Create New...