Jump to content

Accurist movement help


Danh

Recommended Posts

Have you looked under the balance for the I D, my sight is not that good but I think I can see something under the balance. Or take the movement out, remove hands, dial, if nothing there take a photo of the dial side and post, many I D's can be recognized by the setting leaver work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is a FEF 6664. I say think because these style of movements look very similar to each other. To be certain you need to take measurements of the movement & also take what measurement if you can of the old balance staff. 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?00&ranfft&a&2uswk&FEF_6664

 

to do your own research use this

 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-2uswk.cgi?1&ranfft

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK getting the balance is the challenge. If the staff is the same as cal. 6600 or 430 then the staff can be purchased from the link below..

I might have one in my own stock.!!!!!

My "bestfit" book does not show the 6664. So I suggest use the measurements shown @ the balancestaffs site for the 430 to see if it is the one required. 

 

http://www.balancestaffs.com/fef.php

 

or

 

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/3-piece-vintage-FEF-6600-Swiss-made-Balance-Staff-For-Watchmaker-265-/262805841601?hash=item3d3072e6c1:g:~pgAAOSwaB5XjdWG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would certainly say that it was part of the same family of movements as the 6664 but there are a number of differences.

The 6664 has a push pin stem release and an adjustable stud carrier. The OP's watch has a screw stem release, a fixed stud carrier, and a completely different set lever bridge/spring. It also has a cut away around the outer edge of the train wheel bridge, although this may simply be cosmetic.

I'm not saying that it definitely isn't a 6664 as it is not uncommon for there to be slight variations within a particular calibre, however, this level of deviation is usually accompanied by a change in designation.

Of course it may make no difference at all in this case as it could well be that the same balance staff is used across the whole movement family, but then again if there are variations in (for instance) beat rate within the movement family, this may also mean variations in balance design and potentially different staffs.

It goes without saying that whatever it turns out to be it needs a non-shock protected staff and not the Incabloc illustrated on Ranfft.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 19/01/2017 at 9:49 PM, Danh said:

Hi All

hope you all well

i am stuck trying to find out who made this movement, I need a new balance staff for It

it measures approx 18mm x 15mm (6.75x7.75?)

21 jewels

thank you

dan 

IMG_7286.JPG

Hi Dan I've got one similar and it's marked eta 2487 if that's any use.

IMG_0150.PNG

regards 

Kaz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/01/2017 at 10:43 PM, oldhippy said:

BUSAKAZ, I know your trying to help, but your movement is nothing like the Accurist, apart from size and shape. Just look at the difference in the plates and wind up mechanism, do you see how different they are.

 

Oldhippy I can obviously see it is different but if it got him out of trouble he could of had the movement for free.:thumbsu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, BUSAKAZ said:

Oldhippy I can obviously see it is different but if it got him out of trouble he could of had the movement for free.:thumbsu:

Too small I am afraid my friend, but I very much appreciate the thought - very very kind of you

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have it, so until we get a lunch one day , nearly everyday is with my mum at the moment.
    • In the meantime whilst awaiting a better plan, please drop me a quick hello on my email. 
    • I looked at it like this, I've built a lot of stuff in my time, building structures and furniture,those are my creations and they will still be here way way after I'm gone. Traditional watchmakers felt the need to pass their knowledge on, ideas that they created . I assume with them as it is with me, leaving their mark on the earth, a way of being remembered. This creation of Mark's has brought thousands of people together to pass their knowledge around,  ideas that will continue to be used for lifetimes. Ideas that should continue to be procured. If for whatever reason the forum ceased to exist, not quite like Ranfft's, that didn't disappear but much less usable. Then that is sad, such a massive loss of communication between good people and a wealth of knowledge lost. There should be something in place for when that happens which could be next week, next year or in 10 years. Might not be a topical subject for a lot of folk or boardering on controversy, i did say i talk about stuff other people dont. But if you dont talk about it and something happens then you've lost it and you ain't gonna fix it .
    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...