Advertise Here

From Russia with love...and sand!

47 posts in this topic

This is the second Poljot 3133 Chronograph I received, from which I already took the balance wheel to temporarily fix the Sturmanskie on the other thread (when the new balance wheel arrives I will swap them again).

This one looks pretty sad, the case gold plating was badly worn of and the movement, without the stem, makes me think the watch took a plunge in the Baltic Sea, so much sand is inside!




Edited by GeorgeClarkson

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

And off de go...

The first step is to remove the hands and dial. The dial is held by 2 screws on the side of the movement, one opposite of the other. As you can see from the pics, sand is literally everywhere.






Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 small screws and the date mechanism protection plate is removed. The date ring simply sits on the plate, leaving visible the keyless works and gears.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very fine sand has covered the jewels of the chronograph runners bridge so much, I wonder if there are even jewels there...

I then remove the hammer and ist jumper spring




Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Removing all the other parts is pretty straightforward an I will not bother to write all down, sorry. I will just post the pics, for your viewing pleasure.












Vich likes this

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The order was inverted by the phone... But you get the idea. All the parts were cleaned and inspected. I found no broken jewel nor bent pivot, only a lot of sand and dirt.

The chronograph start/stop lever was damaged though, so that will need to be sourced. A pic I took before disassembling the movement shows the broken off tip of the lever, where the pusher should touch it.


Watchtime likes this

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


Where did they store that watch?

In the bottom of the dirty socks basket? :D

I'll look forward to the photos of it looking clean

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hadn't though of it like that, thank you!  Perhaps I should rummage through my scrap bin...
    • I suppose it's better the movements are used for something that gives pleasure rather than put in the bin.  At least folk are then appreciating the beauty of the movements that are otherwise hidden in cases when they were functional. Now where did I put my cuff links?
    • I also bought a small bottle to clean the hairsprings on Hamilton Electric watch balances . The balance also has a coil attached that i wouldn't want to submerge in any cleaning solution , so I use a glass eyedropper to place the solution only on the hairspring and use a delicate ladies cosmetic brush to clean the spring and my blower to dry it. I'll repeat a few times . Seems to work , just use a light touch .
    • The Wife and I are National Trust members and we love the freedom of "we're bored, the kids need air" impromptu trips to local sites.  The annual membership is a pittance when you consider the free parking and access to history (and some rather nice walks and tea-rooms). Whilst at Scotney Castle yesterday we found, in the gift shop, a jewellery maker who used old watch parts to make charms, pendants and brooches.  Now I've seen ladies watch mechanisms turned into cuff-links before but there was an old gents wristwatch movement here, (unmarked and faceless) turned into a necklace/pendant. What "upset" me more were the brooches.  Old, enameled dials, in sizes from Gent's wrist to various pocket watch.  On the back they had epoxy-ed(?) a brooch-pin.  Some of these dials were marked and there were several that I recognise from past eBay sales as being from makers active in the 19th and 20th centuries ("J. W. Benson" stood out). I realise that there must be a market, or they wouldn't stock them.  But it strikes me as "wrong"?
    • This is one of these threads that if discussed across a table would take a  different path.  It is not always easy to put across your exact feelings in a manner that you want, and as such it misconceptions and irritation can result. Ishima has asked me to lock this thread and I agree.  The last thing that he or any of us wanted, is this to turn into one of these runaway vociferous threads.   The tread is now locked!