Jump to content

Can I use D5 in place of 9501


Tmuir

Recommended Posts

I received another box of goodies from Cousins this week which included my oils and grease.

I already had 8200 for the main spring, but purchased D5, 9010 and 9415, but my budget could not stretch to include 9501 at the moment. For now I will only be working on simple manual wind movements, so bearing this in mind can I use D5 on the keyless work instead of 9501 until my budget can stretch to get myself some 9501?

 

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. I will get 9501  probably in the new year when I place my next order from Cousins I just dont want to wait until them before I can start practising servicing watches.

 

I can always strip them down again at a later date and clean and re-oil them again I just want to get started now

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, matabog said:

I heard 9504 is better then 9501 (for the cannon pinion)

For the keyless work I believe hp1300 is better then d5 (better marketed, anyway)

Not just marketing, 9104 (HP1300) is a synthetic oil and that makes a difference in lasting. D5 is still on many service sheets simply because these predates the introduction of more modern formulations, and will never be updated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9501 and 9504 are very similar greases and Moebius state that 9504 has 9501 as its base.

9504 differs from 9501 in that 9504 has a heavier base oil (synthetic), has a more stable soap structure (soap is the thickener which holds the oil) and has added EP (extreme pressure) and anti-wear additives.  On this basis it would perform better in high load areas, but in most cases the cheaper 9501 would suffice.

I would always go for synthetic oils and greases if you can afford them as they are more stable, will retain properties much longer, and generally have higher performance.  Most standard 'synthetic' oils are basically 'synthesised' from mineral crude oil and so are fully compatible and will not be detrimental to seals etc.  Some synthetics (eg 9415) have a different structure.  Care is needed when plastic parts are involved (the oil may not be wetable enough) but generally these are not a real problem if quality watch oils are used.

Edited by canthus
typos
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, canthus said:

9501 and 9504 are very similar greases and Moebius state that 9504 has 9501 as its base.

9504 differs from 9501 in that 9504 has a heavier base oil (synthetic), has a more stable soap structure (soap is the thickener which holds the oil) and has added EP (extreme pressure) and anti-wear additives.  On this basis it would perform better in high load areas, but in most cases the cheaper 9501 would suffice.

I would always go for synthetic oils and greases if you can afford them as they are more stable, will retain properties much longer, and generally have higher performance.  Most standard 'synthetic' oils are basically 'synthesised' from mineral crude oil and so are fully compatible and will not be detrimental to seals etc.  Some synthetics (eg 9415) have a different structure.  Care is needed when plastic parts are involved (the oil may not be wetable enough) but generally these are not a real problem if quality watch oils are used.

Thanks @canthus. I stopped short of suggesting the use of 9501, but I agree that it can be used, and is probably a better choice than D5.

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, noirrac1j said:

Is this the same as Lubeta V105? Not really for the keyless works.

J

No, nothing like Lubeta, it is not a liquid it's a grease. I originally used it (as recommended at the time by ETA) for chronograph parts that come in contact with each other.

I have been using it for some time on sliding pinions, cannon pinions etc and not had one watch come back or fail.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Molykote Dx is also a good grease but getting a bit long in the teeth now.  9504 has similar base oil viscosity but Dx is mineral oil so will not give the same life/performance as 9504 with synthetic oil.  The soap base is basic  lithium unlike 9504's complex soap which again will give better stability for longer (the oil does the lube the soap just holds the oil in place).  Dx has a solid lubricant like molybdenum and 9504 has Boron which more stable than moly.  9504 also has EP and antiwear additives.

Dx does have the advantage of being white in colour whereas 9504 is light blue.  This may be important for visible movements. Dx is also lower cost!

Edited by canthus
added text
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh nice. I have a similar wedge style stump for my staking tool, so I'll give that a shot. Thanks!
    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
×
×
  • Create New...